5 Colorado opinions name it 1 courts 1990–1999 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Bergmanngreen2 sentences1991People v. Sullivan, 802 P.2d 1091, 1094 (Colo.1990); People v. Bergmann, 790 P.2d 840, 842 (Colo.1990). 1990People v. Bergmann, 790 P.2d 840, 842 (Colo.1990). | 3 | 3 |
People v. Reynoldsgreen1 sentence1999We review questions of law de novo as we would in any appeal.” People v. Reynolds, 933 P.2d 1295, 1303 (Colo.1997). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Gibbonsgreen1 sentence1997For example, this court is bound by the factual findings of the hearing board unless those findings are clearly erroneous and not supported by substantial evidence in the record: "[W]e hold that the factual findings of the Grievance Committee are binding upon this court unless, after considering the record as a whole, we conclude that they are clearly erroneous and unsupported by substantial evidence." People v. Gibbons, 685 P.2d 168, 173 (Colo.1984). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Sullivangreen1 sentence1991People v. Sullivan, 802 P.2d 1091, 1094 (Colo.1990); People v. Bergmann, 790 P.2d 840, 842 (Colo.1990). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.