Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Evansgreen2 sentences2004However, in People v. Evans, 174 Ill.2d 320, 332 , 220 Ill.Dec. 332 , 673 N.E.2d 244 (1996), this court held that the motion-to-reconsider-sentence clause of Rule 605(b) applied only to open guilty pleas. 2004However, in People v. Evans, 174 Ill.2d 320, 332 , 220 Ill.Dec. 332 , 673 N.E.2d 244 (1996), this court held that the motion-to-reconsider-sentence clause of Rule 605(b) applied only to open guilty pleas. | 1 | 8 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Brasseaux
green
1 sentence2022Brasseaux, 254 Ill. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Thomas
green
1 sentence2009Similar to the facts in Thomas, 313 Ill. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.