10 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1917–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Burditt v. Brown (In Re Barone)green2 sentences2002In re Barone , 184 B.R. 747, 749 (N.D. 2002In re Barone, 184 B.R. 747, 749 (N.D. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Progressive Land Developers, Inc. v. Exchange National Bank of Chicago
green
2 sentences2020“Specifically, a trustee in violation of the trust is chargeable with (1) any loss or depreciation in value of the trust estate as a result of the breach; or (2) any profit made by him as a result of the breach; or (3) any profit which would have accrued to the trust estate had there been no breach of trust.” Progressive Land Developers, 266 Ill. 1997Progressive, 266 Ill. | 2 | 1997–2020 |
Wilson v. Edward Hospital
green
1 sentence2021Wilson v. Edward Hospital, 2012 IL 112898, ¶ 9 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Curtis v. Fisher
neutral
2 sentences2001Curtis v. Fisher, 406 Ill. 102 , 92 N.E.2d 327 (1950). •5 Here, the jury was instructed of Trustee’s claim that the estate was damaged by Bank’s use of estate assets to settle the federal lawsuit and that Bank benefitted through the use of those assets. 2001Curtis v. Fisher, 406 Ill. 102 , 92 N.E.2d 327 (1950). •5 Here, the jury was instructed of Trustee’s claim that the estate was damaged by Bank’s use of estate assets to settle the federal lawsuit and that Bank benefitted through the use of those assets. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
In Re Guardianship of Connor
green
1 sentence1994App. 3d 759 , 525 N.E.2d 214 .) Specifically, a trustee in violation of the trust is chargeable with (1) any loss or depreciation in value of the trust estate as a result of the breach; or (2) any profit made by him as a result of the breach; or (3) any profit which would have accrued to the trust estate had there been no breach of trust. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Parish v. Parish
green
1 sentence1994(Parish, 29 Ill. 2d at 149 ; Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 205 (1959).) "Where a trustee makes a negligent transfer of trust property, the beneficiary may elect to collect the present value of the property plus any income he could have received from the property after the breach. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Gorin v. McFarland
green
1 sentence1989Gorin v. McFarland (1967), 80 Ill. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Johnson v. Leman
green
1 sentence1943(Wahl v. Schmidt, 307 Ill. 331, 339 ; Johnson v. Leman, 131 Ill. 609 .) There is no such authority in this case. | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Wahl v. Schmidt
green
1 sentence1943(Wahl v. Schmidt, 307 Ill. 331, 339 ; Johnson v. Leman, 131 Ill. 609 .) There is no such authority in this case. | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Wisconsin Universalist Convention v. Union Unitarian & Universalist Society of Prairie du Sac
neutral
1 sentence1917(Wisconsin Universalist Convention v. Unitarian and Universalist Society, 152 Wis. 147 .) The court will not always remove a trustee for error or misjudgment in some special transaction. | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.