trustee violation (Tennessee) · Go Syfert
← Tennessee issues

trustee violation in Tennessee

6 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1904–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of Tennesseegreen
tenn · 2009 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014See Waters v. Farr, 291 S.W.3d 873, 918 (Tenn. 2009) (“One cardinal principle of appellate practice is that a party who fails to raise an issue in the trial court waives its right to raise that issue on appeal.”); see also Tenn. R.

11
Certain Underwriter's at Lloyd's of London v. Transcarriers Inc.green
tennctapp · 2002 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
1 sentence

2010Accordingly, we find that Fortune’s cause of action for breach of contract accrued at the very latest in October 2001 when Unum terminated his benefits by letter. 7 See Transcarriers, 107 S.W.3d at 499-500 (finding that a “contractual statute of limitations begins to run upon denial of liability or upon expiration of the immunity period, whichever comes first”).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
First American Bank of Nashville, N.A. v. Woods green
tennctapp · 1987
2 sentences

1989Bank of Nashville v. Woods, 734 S.W.2d 622 (Tenn.App.1987).

1989Id. at 632 .

11989–1989
Freeman v. Citizens' Nat. Bank green
tenn · 1934
2 sentences

1937Bank, 167 Tenn., 399 , at page 410, 70 S. W. (2d), 25, 29 , “the bank received the bond company’s ‘guardianship check’ ” and was held liable.

1937Bank, 167 Tenn., 399 , at page 410, 70 S. W. (2d), 25, 29 , “the bank received the bond company’s ‘guardianship check’ ” and was held liable.

11937–1937
Steele v. Frierson neutral
tenn · 1887
2 sentences

1909Beginning with Fitzgerald v. Vestal, 4 Sneed, 258 , and extending down through the successive cases of Steele v. Frierson, 85 Tenn., 430 , 3 S. W., 649 , and Read v. Mosby, 87 Tenn., 759 , 11 S. W., 940 , 5 L.

1909Beginning with Fitzgerald v. Vestal, 4 Sneed, 258 , and extending down through the successive cases of Steele v. Frierson, 85 Tenn., 430 , 3 S. W., 649 , and Read v. Mosby, 87 Tenn., 759 , 11 S. W., 940 , 5 L.

11909–1909
Read v. Mosby neutral
tenn · 1889
1 sentence

1909Beginning with Fitzgerald v. Vestal, 4 Sneed, 258 , and extending down through the successive cases of Steele v. Frierson, 85 Tenn., 430 , 3 S. W., 649 , and Read v. Mosby, 87 Tenn., 759 , 11 S. W., 940 , 5 L.

11909–1909
Bank v. Looney neutral
· 1897
1 sentence

1904In the case of Bank v. Looney, 99 Tenn., 278 , this question was considered by this court, and it was said by the chief justice, who delivered the opinion, that in a controversy between a beneficiary of a trust fund and the holder of a paper disposed of by a trustee in violation of his trust, the word “trustee,” appearing upon the face of the paper, is sufficient to put any taker upon notice.

11904–1904

Where else courts name it

NY 33 (1886–2026) CA 18 (1933–2024) TX 17 (1893–2025) IL 10 (1917–2021) OH 9 (1933–2017) UT 7 (1957–2022) IA 7 (1885–2017) IN 6 (1897–2019) PA 6 (1938–2025) TN 6 (1904–2014) GA 6 (1947–2013) ND 4 (1898–2000) MA 3 (1895–2021) NE 3 (1925–1972) AL 3 (1880–1909) MO 3 (1938–2021) NC 2 (1938–1999) DC 2 (1997–2024) OK 2 (1982–2007) FL 2 (1983–2008) AZ 2 (2023–2024) DE 2 (1973–2021) WA 2 (2014–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check