Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1971–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Wichita v. Eisenringgreen2 sentences2012See, e.g., City of Wichita v. Eisenring, 269 Kan. at 782 (“ ‘Information acquired from others, though generally not admissible as an independent fact, may be sufficient to qualify an expert and to supply a partial basis for his opinion.’ ”); Board of Sedgwick County Comm’rs v. Kiser Living Trust, 250 Kan. 84, 96 , 825 P.2d 130 (1992) (“[0]nce a witness has qualified as an expert, a court cannot regulate the factors used or the mental process by which the witness arrives at the conclusion. 2007See City of Wichita v. Eisenring, 269 Kan. 767, 778 , 7 P.3d 1248 (2000). | 2 | 2 |
Board of County Commissioners v. Willard J. Kiser Living Trustgreen2 sentences2012See, e.g., City of Wichita v. Eisenring, 269 Kan. at 782 (“ ‘Information acquired from others, though generally not admissible as an independent fact, may be sufficient to qualify an expert and to supply a partial basis for his opinion.’ ”); Board of Sedgwick County Comm’rs v. Kiser Living Trust, 250 Kan. 84, 96 , 825 P.2d 130 (1992) (“[0]nce a witness has qualified as an expert, a court cannot regulate the factors used or the mental process by which the witness arrives at the conclusion. 2012See, e.g., City of Wichita v. Eisenring, 269 Kan. at 782 (“ ‘Information acquired from others, though generally not admissible as an independent fact, may be sufficient to qualify an expert and to supply a partial basis for his opinion.’ ”); Board of Sedgwick County Comm’rs v. Kiser Living Trust, 250 Kan. 84, 96 , 825 P.2d 130 (1992) (“[0]nce a witness has qualified as an expert, a court cannot regulate the factors used or the mental process by which the witness arrives at the conclusion. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Bonner Springs v. Coleman
green
2 sentences1971In the recent case of City of Bonner Springs v. Coleman, 206 Kan. 689 , 481 P. 2d 950 , we state: “It must also be understood that once a witness has qualified as an expert, a court cannot regulate the factors he uses or the mental process by which he arrives at his conclusion. 1971In the recent case of City of Bonner Springs v. Coleman, 206 Kan. 689 , 481 P. 2d 950 , we state: “It must also be understood that once a witness has qualified as an expert, a court cannot regulate the factors he uses or the mental process by which he arrives at his conclusion. | 7 | 1971–2018 |
Pope v. Ransdell
green
2 sentences1993Further, our Supreme Court has stated that once the trial court has determined a witness is qualified to testify as an expert witness, “the court cannot regulate the factors or mental processes used by the expert in reaching his opinion or conclusion on the case.” Pope v. Ransdell, 251 Kan. 112, 123 , 833 P.2d 965 (1992). 1993Further, our Supreme Court has stated that once the trial court has determined a witness is qualified to testify as an expert witness, “the court cannot regulate the factors or mental processes used by the expert in reaching his opinion or conclusion on the case.” Pope v. Ransdell, 251 Kan. 112, 123 , 833 P.2d 965 (1992). | 2 | 1993–2018 |
State Highway Commission v. Lee
green
2 sentences1976Borrowing the rule as expressed in the opinions of State Highway Commission v. Lee, 207 Kan. 284 , 485 P. 2d 310 , and City of Bonner Springs v. Coleman, 206 Kan. 689 , 481 P. 2d 950 , the city claims these matters can only be challenged by cross-examination. 1976Borrowing the rule as expressed in the opinions of State Highway Commission v. Lee, 207 Kan. 284 , 485 P. 2d 310 , and City of Bonner Springs v. Coleman, 206 Kan. 689 , 481 P. 2d 950 , the city claims these matters can only be challenged by cross-examination. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Eisenring v. Kansas Turnpike Authority
green
2 sentences1971(See Eisenring v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 183 Kan. 774 , 332 P.2d 539 .) Recently this court has held in City of Bonner Springs v. Coleman, 206 Kan. 689 , 481 P.2d 950 , that once a witness has qualified as an expert, a court cannot regulate the factors he uses or the mental *298 process by which he arrives at his conclusion. 1971(See Eisenring v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 183 Kan. 774 , 332 P.2d 539 .) Recently this court has held in City of Bonner Springs v. Coleman, 206 Kan. 689 , 481 P.2d 950 , that once a witness has qualified as an expert, a court cannot regulate the factors he uses or the mental *298 process by which he arrives at his conclusion. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.