four assignments error (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

four assignments error in Louisiana

10 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1968–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Harold A. Asher, CPA, LLC v. Haikgreen
lactapp · 2013 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023App 4 Cir. 4/10/13), 116 So.3d 720, 723 (citing Sassone v. Doe, 11-1821, pp. 2-3 (La.

11
Martin v. Martingreen
lactapp · 2012 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015It was ordered that all three children were to have “no access or contact”, with Vernon O’Quinn, who was now Christina’s boyfriend. ■. .Christina and the children were ordered to. attend counseling, and the trial court determined child support awards. .Christina appealed., - On appeal, Christina asserts the following four assignments of error: ■ ■ |.,(1) The trial court erred by allowing an internal affairs report (IA Report} from the Lake Charles ‘Police Department (LCPD) regarding its former employee, Vernon, to be introduced into evidence and used when cross-examining • witnesses; (2) The t

11
State v. Hearoldgreen
la · 1992 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013See State v. Hearold, 603 So.2d 731 (La.1992).

11
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp.green
la · 1993 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
1 sentence

2004In Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257, 1261 (La.1993), the supreme court articulated the standard of appellate review of general damage awards: [ T]he discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.

11
Rosell v. Escogreen
la · 1989 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
1 sentence

2000DISCUSSION An appellate court may not disturb the conclusions reached by a jury regarding factual matters in the absence of "manifest error" or unless a particular finding of fact was "clearly wrong." Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840, 844 (La.1989).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Hebert v. Blanchard green
lactapp · 1997
1 sentence

2015Louisiana Civil Code Article 131 directs that “[i]h a proceeding for divorce or thereafter, the court shall award-custody of a child in accordance with the best interest of the child." As such, custody cases are to be decided upon their “own particular facts and circumstances,” keeping in mind that “the paramount goal is to do what is in the best interest of the minor children.” Hebert v. Blanchard, 97-550, p. 4 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/29/97), 702 So.2d 1102, 1105 .

12015–2015
McManus v. McManus green
lactapp · 2013
1 sentence

2015It was ordered that all three children were to have “no access or contact”, with Vernon O’Quinn, who was now Christina’s boyfriend. ■. .Christina and the children were ordered to. attend counseling, and the trial court determined child support awards. .Christina appealed., - On appeal, Christina asserts the following four assignments of error: ■ ■ |.,(1) The trial court erred by allowing an internal affairs report (IA Report} from the Lake Charles ‘Police Department (LCPD) regarding its former employee, Vernon, to be introduced into evidence and used when cross-examining • witnesses; (2) The t

12015–2015
Jackson v. Virginia red
scotus · 1979
2 sentences

2013ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR NUMBERS ONE AND TWO In his first assignment of error, Defendant contends that the evidence, when viewed under the Jackson v. Virgi nia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), standard, was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he manufactured methamphetamine on or about December 21, 2011.

2013ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR NUMBERS ONE AND TWO In his first assignment of error, Defendant contends that the evidence, when viewed under the Jackson v. Virgi nia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), standard, was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he manufactured methamphetamine on or about December 21, 2011.

12013–2013
Arceneaux v. Domingue green
la · 1978
1 sentence

1985Our standard of review is dictated by Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978), and its progeny.

11985–1985
Shaffett v. Vicks green
lactapp · 1980
1 sentence

1981In urging that LSA-R.S. 56:1478 is inapplicable to this case, appellant relies heavily on the recent case of Shaffett v. Vicks, 385 So.2d 419 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1980) where the court held that defendant was not liable for treble damages where defendant's loggers did not act willfully and intentionally in cutting and removing trees from plaintiff's property and the two properties were not divided by any visibly designated demarcation line.

11981–1981
State v. Thomas green
la · 1974
1 sentence

1977State v. Thomas, 290 So.2d 317 (La.1974). (2) We have previously rejected contentions similar to those now advanced of the unconstitutionality of provisions of the statute upon which the defendant was pros ecuted and convicted.

11977–1977
Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. Shipp green
lactapp · 1968
1 sentence

1968We granted a writ of certiorari on the application of the Executrix of the Succession of Carl Shipp, Jr., in order that we might review the judgment of the Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit, 205 So.2d 101 , limited, however, to two of the four assignments of error, i. e., number 3 and part 3 of number 4, 1 affirming the judgment of the district court in favor of plaintiff, Deposit Guaranty National Bank, against William Carl Shipp, and Mrs. Louise Stevens Shipp, as Executrix of the Succession of Carl Shipp, Jr., in solido, “In the full sum of $213,127.00 with interest thereon at the rate

11968–1968

Where else courts name it

OH 64 (1960–2025) LA 10 (1968–2023) OR 5 (1981–2026) OK 5 (1923–1977) VA 3 (2016–2024) PA 2 (1917–1926) NE 2 (1984–1991) NC 2 (1931–2009) ID 2 (1914–1924)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check