10 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1880–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Goldblum v. Hardengreen1 sentence2014It is also uncertain when it is not determinable, in which case the obligation must be performed within a reasonable time.”); see also Goldblum v. Harden, 188 So.2d 630, 632 (La.App. 4th Cir.1966) (where lease left blank the period of time for the lessee to cure a violation of the lease after written notice from the lessor, the court held that "after being notified of a lease violation the tenant should be given a Reasonable delay within which to correct the same before the landlord would have the right to terminate the lease.”) . | 1 | 1 |
Houston v. Chargoisgreen1 sentence2013See Houston v. Chargois, 98-1979, p. 1 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/24/99), 732 So.2d 71, 73 (The record, virtually absent of testimony or documentary evidence, did not support the conclusion that an oral lease existed between plaintiff and her stepfather with respect to plaintiffs rule for possession to evict plaintiffs stepfather.) The relevant federal regulation mandates that no tenant, member of the tenant’s household, or guest engage in “[a]ny criminal activity that threatens the ^health, safety, or right to peaceful enjoyment of the premises by other residents.” See 24 C.F.R. § 966.4 (f)(12)(i)(A). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Canal Realty & Improvement Co. v. Pailet
green
2 sentences2014The court cited the Louisiana Supreme Court case of Canal Realty and Improvement Co. v. Pallet, 217 La. 376 , 46 So.2d 303 (1950), which held that the acceptance of rent after notice of eviction by the landlord, “constituted a waiver of that notice and a forgiveness as to any and all previously committed infractions, and it served to reinstate the lease as of that time.” A & J, Inc., 02-259, p. 7, 831 So.2d at 316 . 2014The court cited the Louisiana Supreme Court case of Canal Realty and Improvement Co. v. Pallet, 217 La. 376 , 46 So.2d 303 (1950), which held that the acceptance of rent after notice of eviction by the landlord, “constituted a waiver of that notice and a forgiveness as to any and all previously committed infractions, and it served to reinstate the lease as of that time.” A & J, Inc., 02-259, p. 7, 831 So.2d at 316 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
A & J, INC. v. Ackel Real Estate, LLC
neutral
1 sentence2014The court cited the Louisiana Supreme Court case of Canal Realty and Improvement Co. v. Pallet, 217 La. 376 , 46 So.2d 303 (1950), which held that the acceptance of rent after notice of eviction by the landlord, “constituted a waiver of that notice and a forgiveness as to any and all previously committed infractions, and it served to reinstate the lease as of that time.” A & J, Inc., 02-259, p. 7, 831 So.2d at 316 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Versailles Arms Apartments v. Wheeler
green
1 sentence1990Further, this matter is distinguishable from Versailles Arms Apartments v. Wheeler, 452 So.2d 326 (La.App. 4th Cir. *579 1984). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Piggly Wiggly of Mansfield, Inc. v. Wolpert Associates
neutral
1 sentence1988We note that in Piggly Wiggly of Mansfield, Inc. v. Wolpert Associates, 519 So.2d 371 (La.App. 2d Cir.1988), writ denied 522 So.2d 1098 (La.1988), the execution of an estoppel certificate by the tenant, Piggly Wiggly, was found to constitute an express waiver of its rights to enforce a lease clause by which its lessor was to prohibit any other tenant in the shopping center from selling grocery items. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Ensminger v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co.
green
1 sentence1988In Ensminger v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 134 So.2d 686 (La.App.2d Cir.1961) this court found that the following clause in a lease constituted an assumption of liability by the lessee: “It is agreed that lessee will hold lessor harmless from all claims of bodily injury or other liability by lessee’s employees or agents or others growing out of the use and occupancy of the premises.” Since the lease clause under consideration contains similar language, we find that it was an assumption of liability by the tenant for accidents in the affected area. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Piggly Wiggly of Mansfield, Inc. v. Wolpert Associates
neutral
1 sentence1988We note that in Piggly Wiggly of Mansfield, Inc. v. Wolpert Associates, 519 So.2d 371 (La.App. 2d Cir.1988), writ denied 522 So.2d 1098 (La.1988), the execution of an estoppel certificate by the tenant, Piggly Wiggly, was found to constitute an express waiver of its rights to enforce a lease clause by which its lessor was to prohibit any other tenant in the shopping center from selling grocery items. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Lee Lbr. Co., Ltd. v. INTERN. PAPER CO.
neutral
1 sentence1980App. 3 Cir. 1977), certiorari denied, 347 So.2d 503 (La.1977), as supporting his theory that plaintiff is estopped from enforcing a provision of a lease where the violation of that provision was sought to be strictly enforced when the lessor had acquiesced in said violation. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Arata v. Louisiana Stadium and Exposition District
green
1 sentence1970Under the terms of paragraph (D) the District is authorized ‘to execute leases to the State’.” 225 So.2d at 365 . | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Henry Rose Mercantile & Mfg. Co. v. Stearns
green
2 sentences1964Co. v. Stearns, 154 La. 946 , 98 So. 429 , the court held: "By the terms of article 2692 of the Civil Code it is the duty of the lessor to maintain the lessee in the peaceable possession of the property let, during the continuance of the lease. 1964Co. v. Stearns, 154 La. 946 , 98 So. 429 , the court held: "By the terms of article 2692 of the Civil Code it is the duty of the lessor to maintain the lessee in the peaceable possession of the property let, during the continuance of the lease. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Cunningham v. Middleton
neutral
1 sentence1948Cunningham v. Middleton, 4 La. | 1 | 1948–1948 |
Miller v. Michoud
neutral
1 sentence1880In the case of Miller v. Michaud, 11 Rob. 225 , the court say we think, under our laws, a similar doctrine can safely be adopted; again, “If the lessee of a naked lot erect houses upon it with his own materials, the buildings, presumed to belong to the owner of the soil, would only give the lessee the right at the expiration of the lease to claim from the lessor the value of the materials and price of workmanship” (or as we have seen under Art. 2726, a fair value). | 1 | 1880–1880 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.