lease violation (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

lease violation in Louisiana

10 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1880–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Goldblum v. Hardengreen
lactapp · 1966 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014It is also uncertain when it is not determinable, in which case the obligation must be performed within a reasonable time.”); see also Goldblum v. Harden, 188 So.2d 630, 632 (La.App. 4th Cir.1966) (where lease left blank the period of time for the lessee to cure a violation of the lease after written notice from the lessor, the court held that "after being notified of a lease violation the tenant should be given a Reasonable delay within which to correct the same before the landlord would have the right to terminate the lease.”) .

11
Houston v. Chargoisgreen
lactapp · 1999 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013See Houston v. Chargois, 98-1979, p. 1 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/24/99), 732 So.2d 71, 73 (The record, virtually absent of testimony or documentary evidence, did not support the conclusion that an oral lease existed between plaintiff and her stepfather with respect to plaintiffs rule for possession to evict plaintiffs stepfather.) The relevant federal regulation mandates that no tenant, member of the tenant’s household, or guest engage in “[a]ny criminal activity that threatens the ^health, safety, or right to peaceful enjoyment of the premises by other residents.” See 24 C.F.R. § 966.4 (f)(12)(i)(A).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

CaseCitedYears
Canal Realty & Improvement Co. v. Pailet green
la · 1950
2 sentences

2014The court cited the Louisiana Supreme Court case of Canal Realty and Improvement Co. v. Pallet, 217 La. 376 , 46 So.2d 303 (1950), which held that the acceptance of rent after notice of eviction by the landlord, “constituted a waiver of that notice and a forgiveness as to any and all previously committed infractions, and it served to reinstate the lease as of that time.” A & J, Inc., 02-259, p. 7, 831 So.2d at 316 .

2014The court cited the Louisiana Supreme Court case of Canal Realty and Improvement Co. v. Pallet, 217 La. 376 , 46 So.2d 303 (1950), which held that the acceptance of rent after notice of eviction by the landlord, “constituted a waiver of that notice and a forgiveness as to any and all previously committed infractions, and it served to reinstate the lease as of that time.” A & J, Inc., 02-259, p. 7, 831 So.2d at 316 .

12014–2014
A & J, INC. v. Ackel Real Estate, LLC neutral
lactapp · 2002
1 sentence

2014The court cited the Louisiana Supreme Court case of Canal Realty and Improvement Co. v. Pallet, 217 La. 376 , 46 So.2d 303 (1950), which held that the acceptance of rent after notice of eviction by the landlord, “constituted a waiver of that notice and a forgiveness as to any and all previously committed infractions, and it served to reinstate the lease as of that time.” A & J, Inc., 02-259, p. 7, 831 So.2d at 316 .

12014–2014
Versailles Arms Apartments v. Wheeler green
lactapp · 1984
1 sentence

1990Further, this matter is distinguishable from Versailles Arms Apartments v. Wheeler, 452 So.2d 326 (La.App. 4th Cir. *579 1984).

11990–1990
Piggly Wiggly of Mansfield, Inc. v. Wolpert Associates neutral
lactapp · 1988
1 sentence

1988We note that in Piggly Wiggly of Mansfield, Inc. v. Wolpert Associates, 519 So.2d 371 (La.App. 2d Cir.1988), writ denied 522 So.2d 1098 (La.1988), the execution of an estoppel certificate by the tenant, Piggly Wiggly, was found to constitute an express waiver of its rights to enforce a lease clause by which its lessor was to prohibit any other tenant in the shopping center from selling grocery items.

11988–1988
Ensminger v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. green
lactapp · 1961
1 sentence

1988In Ensminger v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 134 So.2d 686 (La.App.2d Cir.1961) this court found that the following clause in a lease constituted an assumption of liability by the lessee: “It is agreed that lessee will hold lessor harmless from all claims of bodily injury or other liability by lessee’s employees or agents or others growing out of the use and occupancy of the premises.” Since the lease clause under consideration contains similar language, we find that it was an assumption of liability by the tenant for accidents in the affected area.

11988–1988
Piggly Wiggly of Mansfield, Inc. v. Wolpert Associates neutral
la · 1988
1 sentence

1988We note that in Piggly Wiggly of Mansfield, Inc. v. Wolpert Associates, 519 So.2d 371 (La.App. 2d Cir.1988), writ denied 522 So.2d 1098 (La.1988), the execution of an estoppel certificate by the tenant, Piggly Wiggly, was found to constitute an express waiver of its rights to enforce a lease clause by which its lessor was to prohibit any other tenant in the shopping center from selling grocery items.

11988–1988
Lee Lbr. Co., Ltd. v. INTERN. PAPER CO. neutral
la · 1977
1 sentence

1980App. 3 Cir. 1977), certiorari denied, 347 So.2d 503 (La.1977), as supporting his theory that plaintiff is estopped from enforcing a provision of a lease where the violation of that provision was sought to be strictly enforced when the lessor had acquiesced in said violation.

11980–1980
Arata v. Louisiana Stadium and Exposition District green
la · 1969
1 sentence

1970Under the terms of paragraph (D) the District is authorized ‘to execute leases to the State’.” 225 So.2d at 365 .

11970–1970
Henry Rose Mercantile & Mfg. Co. v. Stearns green
la · 1923
2 sentences

1964Co. v. Stearns, 154 La. 946 , 98 So. 429 , the court held: "By the terms of article 2692 of the Civil Code it is the duty of the lessor to maintain the lessee in the peaceable possession of the property let, during the continuance of the lease.

1964Co. v. Stearns, 154 La. 946 , 98 So. 429 , the court held: "By the terms of article 2692 of the Civil Code it is the duty of the lessor to maintain the lessee in the peaceable possession of the property let, during the continuance of the lease.

11964–1964
Cunningham v. Middleton neutral
lactapp · 1926
1 sentence

1948Cunningham v. Middleton, 4 La.

11948–1948
Miller v. Michoud neutral
la · 1845
1 sentence

1880In the case of Miller v. Michaud, 11 Rob. 225 , the court say we think, under our laws, a similar doctrine can safely be adopted; again, “If the lessee of a naked lot erect houses upon it with his own materials, the buildings, presumed to belong to the owner of the soil, would only give the lessee the right at the expiration of the lease to claim from the lessor the value of the materials and price of workmanship” (or as we have seen under Art. 2726, a fair value).

11880–1880

Where else courts name it

NY 128 (1881–2025) TX 39 (1939–2025) CA 29 (1895–2025) IL 25 (1914–2025) DC 17 (1944–2021) MA 15 (1926–2026) NJ 13 (1944–2025) LA 10 (1880–2014) GA 10 (1937–1995) OH 10 (1949–2021) FL 10 (1944–2022) WI 9 (1939–2024) PA 8 (1897–2021) MO 7 (1919–2025) AL 7 (1955–2010) KS 7 (1937–2013) CO 7 (1956–2001) MD 6 (1920–2016) CT 6 (1943–2009) AZ 6 (1970–2023) HI 5 (1980–2017) AK 5 (1972–2022) MN 5 (1887–2003) UT 4 (1983–2026) IN 4 (1930–2007) OK 4 (1913–2001) KY 4 (1931–2023) MI 4 (1903–2002) IA 4 (1970–2015) MT 4 (1887–1957) NE 3 (1909–1990) NC 3 (1992–2015) WA 3 (1892–1996) WV 3 (1915–1987) DE 2 (2004–2016) TN 2 (1992–2016) NH 2 (2004–2019) WY 2 (1924–1981) SD 2 (1998–1998) NM 2 (1949–2012) NV 2 (1942–1956) SC 2 (2013–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check