10 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Silberstein v. Pro-Golf of America, Incgreen2 sentences2022See Silberstein v Pro-Golf of America, Inc, 278 Mich App 446, 457 ; 750 NW2d 615 (2008) (“Where a motion for summary disposition is brought under both MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (C)(10), but the parties and the trial court relied on matters outside the pleadings, . . . 2022See Silberstein v Pro-Golf of America, Inc, 278 Mich App 446, 457 ; 750 NW2d 615 (2008) (“Where a motion for summary disposition is brought under both MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (C)(10), but the parties and the trial court relied on matters outside the pleadings, . . . | 1 | 1 |
Bird Finance Corp. v. Lamersongreen2 sentences1986See Bird Finance Corp v Lamerson, 303 Mich 422 ; 6 NW2d 732 (1942) (discussing the notice provision under pre-Uniform Commercial Code Law). 1986See Bird Finance Corp v Lamerson, 303 Mich 422 ; 6 NW2d 732 (1942) (discussing the notice provision under pre-Uniform Commercial Code Law). | 1 | 1 |
Schmidt v. Gauklergreen2 sentences1986See Schmidt v Gaukler, 156 Mich 243 ; 120 NW 746 (1909); Barney v Tontine Surety Co, 131 Mich 192 ; 91 NW 140 (1902). 1986See Schmidt v Gaukler, 156 Mich 243 ; 120 NW 746 (1909); Barney v Tontine Surety Co, 131 Mich 192 ; 91 NW 140 (1902). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stanke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
green
2 sentences2018However, the Oehmkes could cure their failure to properly assert the usury defense by seeking leave to amend the answer, and the trial court had the general obligation to grant leave: “It is a fundamental rule of civil procedure in this state that leave to amend pleadings should be given freely.” Stanke, 200 Mich App at 321 , citing MCR 2.118(A)(2) and Ben Fyke & Sons, 390 Mich at 656 . 2018However, the Oehmkes could cure their failure to properly assert the usury defense by seeking leave to amend the answer, and the trial court had the general obligation to grant leave: “It is a fundamental rule of civil procedure in this state that leave to amend pleadings should be given freely.” Stanke, 200 Mich App at 321 , citing MCR 2.118(A)(2) and Ben Fyke & Sons, 390 Mich at 656 . | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Weymers v. Khera
green
2 sentences2018A trial court should deny a motion for leave to amend only for particularized reasons, such as “[1] undue delay, [2] bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, [3] repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, [4] undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, [and 5] futility.” Weymers v Khera, 454 Mich 639, 658 ; 563 NW2d 647 (1997) (quotation marks and citation omitted; brackets in original). 2018A trial court should deny a motion for leave to amend only for particularized reasons, such as “[1] undue delay, [2] bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, [3] repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, [4] undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, [and 5] futility.” Weymers v Khera, 454 Mich 639, 658 ; 563 NW2d 647 (1997) (quotation marks and citation omitted; brackets in original). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Ben P. Fyke & Sons v. Gunter Co.
green
2 sentences2018However, the Oehmkes could cure their failure to properly assert the usury defense by seeking leave to amend the answer, and the trial court had the general obligation to grant leave: “It is a fundamental rule of civil procedure in this state that leave to amend pleadings should be given freely.” Stanke, 200 Mich App at 321 , citing MCR 2.118(A)(2) and Ben Fyke & Sons, 390 Mich at 656 . 2018However, the Oehmkes could cure their failure to properly assert the usury defense by seeking leave to amend the answer, and the trial court had the general obligation to grant leave: “It is a fundamental rule of civil procedure in this state that leave to amend pleadings should be given freely.” Stanke, 200 Mich App at 321 , citing MCR 2.118(A)(2) and Ben Fyke & Sons, 390 Mich at 656 . | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Union Guardian Trust Co. v. Crawford
green
2 sentences1987Union Guardian Trust Co v Crawford, 270 Mich 207, 211 ; 258 NW 248 (1935); Waldorf v Zinberg, 106 Mich App 159, 163-165 ; 307 NW2d 749 (1981). 1987Union Guardian Trust Co v Crawford, 270 Mich 207, 211 ; 258 NW 248 (1935); Waldorf v Zinberg, 106 Mich App 159, 163-165 ; 307 NW2d 749 (1981). | 2 | 1987–1987 |
Waldorf v. Zinberg
green
2 sentences1987Union Guardian Trust Co v Crawford, 270 Mich 207, 211 ; 258 NW 248 (1935); Waldorf v Zinberg, 106 Mich App 159, 163-165 ; 307 NW2d 749 (1981). 1987Union Guardian Trust Co v Crawford, 270 Mich 207, 211 ; 258 NW 248 (1935); Waldorf v Zinberg, 106 Mich App 159, 163-165 ; 307 NW2d 749 (1981). | 2 | 1987–1987 |
Wright v. First National Bank
green
1 sentence2023Either the borrower repays the lender at the illegal rate (and likely is precluded from recovering those payments, see, e.g., Wright, 297 Mich at 328 ) or the borrower declines to pay and raises a usury defense to the lender’s collection action. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Fretz v. Murray
green
1 sentence2023Id., quoting 1843 PA 47 (“ ‘The [lender] shall have judgment for the principal and legal interest only.’ ”). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Biberstine v. Woodworth
green
2 sentences1987This conclusion is supported by Biberstine v Wood-worth, 406 Mich 275 ; 278 NW2d 41 (1979). 1987This conclusion is supported by Biberstine v Wood-worth, 406 Mich 275 ; 278 NW2d 41 (1979). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Osinski v. Yowell
green
2 sentences1986Osinski v Yowell, 135 Mich App 279, 287-288 ; 354 NW2d 318 (1984). 1986Osinski v Yowell, 135 Mich App 279, 287-288 ; 354 NW2d 318 (1984). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Barney v. Tontine Surety Co.
neutral
2 sentences1986See Schmidt v Gaukler, 156 Mich 243 ; 120 NW 746 (1909); Barney v Tontine Surety Co, 131 Mich 192 ; 91 NW 140 (1902). 1986See Schmidt v Gaukler, 156 Mich 243 ; 120 NW 746 (1909); Barney v Tontine Surety Co, 131 Mich 192 ; 91 NW 140 (1902). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.