Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1980–1996 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Young v. City of Duluthgreen2 sentences1995Id. at 737 . 1987See Young v. City of Duluth, 386 N.W.2d 732, 739 (Minn.1986). | 1 | 2 |
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. Schradergreen2 sentences1995In re Schrader, 394 N.W.2d 796, 801 (Minn.1986). 1995Id. at 801-02 . | 1 | 2 |
Johnson v. Village of Cohassetgreen2 sentences1996See Johnson v. Village of Cohasset, 263 Minn. 425, 437 , 116 N.W.2d 692, 700 (1962) (holding that an honorably discharged military service veteran who has *606 been suspended without pay from public employment is entitled to an award of back wages and benefits from the date of his suspension until the date of the decision of the veterans preference hearing board, plus interest). 1996See Johnson v. Village of Cohasset, 263 Minn. 425, 437 , 116 N.W.2d 692, 700 (1962) (holding that an honorably discharged military service veteran who has *606 been suspended without pay from public employment is entitled to an award of back wages and benefits from the date of his suspension until the date of the decision of the veterans preference hearing board, plus interest). | 1 | 1 |
O'Bert v. Andersongreen1 sentence1990General Drivers, 320 N.W.2d at 700 ; O’Bert v. Anderson, 320 N.W.2d 712, 712 (Minn.1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
General Drivers, Local 346 v. Aitkin County Board
green
2 sentences1990General Drivers, 320 N.W.2d at 700 ; O’Bert v. Anderson, 320 N.W.2d 712, 712 (Minn.1982). 1982General Drivers, Local #346, for Itself and on Behalf of Dennis Murdock v. Aitkin County Board, et al., 320 N.W.2d 695 (Minn.1982), decided this day, holds that a veteran who is fired from his job as a deputy sheriff is entitled to a veterans preference hearing. | 2 | 1982–1990 |
Mahoney v. Minnesota Department of Highways
neutral
2 sentences1989Id. at 202 , 161 N.W.2d at 46 . 1989Id. at 202 , 161 N.W.2d at 46 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Leininger v. City of Bloomington
green
2 sentences1986This court first had an opportunity to address the question of the scope of power of a veterans preference hearing board in Leininger v. City of Bloomington, 299 N.W.2d 723 (Minn.1980). 1986This court first had an opportunity to address the question of the scope of power of a veterans preference hearing board in Leininger v. City of Bloomington, 299 N.W.2d 723 (Minn.1980). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS BY JOHNSON v. Singer
green
1 sentence1980In City of Minneapolis by Johnson v. Singer, 253 N.W.2d 150 (1977), we found that although the Minneapolis City Charter did not expressly authorize the fashioning of remedies by the Minneapolis Civil Service Commission, that authority was implied by other provisions of the Minneapolis City Charter. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.