Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1970–1996 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kennedy v. Dixongreen2 sentences1996Although neither party questions the procedure resulting in dismissal here, we initially note that attempting to apply the most significant contacts rule, as initially set forth in Missouri in Kennedy v. Dixon, 439 S.W.2d 173 (Mo. banc 1969) is difficult at best, but more so when an action is dismissed on a motion to dismiss. 1970Respondent also cites Kennedy v. Dixon, Mo., 439 S.W.2d 173 , and maintains that the facts in the instant case bring it within the principal contacts rule followed in that case. | 2 | 6 |
Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson v. Crawfordgreen1 sentence1995Thompson v. Crawford, 833 S.W.2d 868, 870 (Mo. banc 1992). | 1 | 1 |
Burgess v. Perduegreen2 sentences1987See Burgess v. Perdue, 239 Kan. 473 , 721 P.2d 239 (1986). 1987See Burgess v. Perdue, 239 Kan. 473 , 721 P.2d 239 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
First National Bank of Kansas City v. Wardgreen1 sentence1980See, First National Bank of Kansas City v. Ward, 380 F.Supp. 782 (W.D.Mo.1974); J. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Trzecki v. Gruenewald
green
1 sentence1988The Missouri Supreme Court decided in Trzecki v. Gruenewald, 532 S.W.2d 209 (Mo. banc 1976), not cited by appellant under his point, and Dorris v. McClanahan, 725 S.W.2d 870 (Mo. banc 1987), cited by appellant, that § 516.190 is applicable to personal injury actions arising from vehicular collisions occurring in another state because the cause of action “originated” there. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Dorris v. McClanahan
green
1 sentence1988The Missouri Supreme Court decided in Trzecki v. Gruenewald, 532 S.W.2d 209 (Mo. banc 1976), not cited by appellant under his point, and Dorris v. McClanahan, 725 S.W.2d 870 (Mo. banc 1987), cited by appellant, that § 516.190 is applicable to personal injury actions arising from vehicular collisions occurring in another state because the cause of action “originated” there. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.