Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Browngreen2 sentences2014However, “a trial court is not required to repeat verbatim a requested, specific instruction that is correct and supported by the evidence, but that it is sufficient if the court gives the instruction in substantial conformity with the request.” State v. Brown, 335 N.C. 477, 490 , 439 S.E.2d 589, 597 (1994) (citations omitted). 2014However, “a trial court is not required to repeat verbatim a requested, specific instruction that is correct and supported by the evidence, but that it is sufficient if the court gives the instruction in substantial conformity with the request.” State v. Brown, 335 N.C. 477, 490 , 439 S.E.2d 589, 597 (1994) (citations omitted). | 5 | 5 |
State v. McNeillgreen2 sentences2007A trial court is not required to give a verbatim instruction as requested, for "it is sufficient if the court gives the instruction in substantial conformity with the request." State v. McNeill, 346 N.C. 233, 239 , 485 S.E.2d 284, 288 (1997). 2007A trial court is not required to give a verbatim instruction as requested, for "it is sufficient if the court gives the instruction in substantial conformity with the request." State v. McNeill, 346 N.C. 233, 239 , 485 S.E.2d 284, 288 (1997). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Peekgreen2 sentences2010On appeal, in determining whether a court’s instructions forced a verdict or merely served as a catalyst for further deliberations, “an appellate court must consider the circumstances under which the instructions were made and the probable impact of the instructions on the jury.” State v. Peek, 313 N.C. 266, 271 , 328 S.E.2d 249, 253 (1985) (citation omitted). 2010On appeal, in determining whether a court’s instructions forced a verdict or merely served as a catalyst for further deliberations, “an appellate court must consider the circumstances under which the instructions were made and the probable impact of the instructions on the jury.” State v. Peek, 313 N.C. 266, 271 , 328 S.E.2d 249, 253 (1985) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. McQueengreen1 sentence2005State v. McQueen, 324 N.C. 118, 142-43 , 377 S.E.2d 38, 52 (1989). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Baileygreen2 sentences1994State v. Rhinehart, 324 N.C. 310, 315 , 377 S.E.2d 746, 749 (1989); State v. Davis, 291 N.C. 1, 14 , 229 S.E.2d 285, 294 (1976); State v. Bailey, 254 N.C. 380, 386 , 119 S.E.2d 165, 170 (1961). 1994State v. Rhinehart, 324 N.C. 310, 315 , 377 S.E.2d 746, 749 (1989); State v. Davis, 291 N.C. 1, 14 , 229 S.E.2d 285, 294 (1976); State v. Bailey, 254 N.C. 380, 386 , 119 S.E.2d 165, 170 (1961). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Davisgreen2 sentences1994State v. Rhinehart, 324 N.C. 310, 315 , 377 S.E.2d 746, 749 (1989); State v. Davis, 291 N.C. 1, 14 , 229 S.E.2d 285, 294 (1976); State v. Bailey, 254 N.C. 380, 386 , 119 S.E.2d 165, 170 (1961). 1994State v. Rhinehart, 324 N.C. 310, 315 , 377 S.E.2d 746, 749 (1989); State v. Davis, 291 N.C. 1, 14 , 229 S.E.2d 285, 294 (1976); State v. Bailey, 254 N.C. 380, 386 , 119 S.E.2d 165, 170 (1961). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rhinehartgreen2 sentences1994State v. Rhinehart, 324 N.C. 310, 315 , 377 S.E.2d 746, 749 (1989); State v. Davis, 291 N.C. 1, 14 , 229 S.E.2d 285, 294 (1976); State v. Bailey, 254 N.C. 380, 386 , 119 S.E.2d 165, 170 (1961). 1994State v. Rhinehart, 324 N.C. 310, 315 , 377 S.E.2d 746, 749 (1989); State v. Davis, 291 N.C. 1, 14 , 229 S.E.2d 285, 294 (1976); State v. Bailey, 254 N.C. 380, 386 , 119 S.E.2d 165, 170 (1961). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. United States
green
2 sentences2003However, “ ‘a trial court is not required to repeat verbatim a requested, specific instruction that is correct and supported by the evidence, ... if the court gives the instruction in substantial conformity with the request.’ ” State v. Lloyd, 354 N.C. 76, 92 , 552 S.E.2d 596, 610 (2001) (quoting State v. McNeill, 346 N.C. 233, 239 , 485 S.E.2d 284, 288 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1053 , 139 L. 2001We consistently have held that “ ‘a trial court is not required to repeat verbatim a requested, specific instruction that is correct and supported by the evidence, but that it is sufficient if the court gives the instruction in substantial conformity with the request.’ ” State v. McNeill, 346 N.C. 233, 239 , 485 S.E.2d 284, 288 (1997) (quoting State v. Brown, 335 N.C. 477, 490 , 439 S.E.2d 589, 597 (1994)), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1053 , 139 L. | 2 | 2001–2003 |
Maloney v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
green
2 sentences2003However, “ ‘a trial court is not required to repeat verbatim a requested, specific instruction that is correct and supported by the evidence, ... if the court gives the instruction in substantial conformity with the request.’ ” State v. Lloyd, 354 N.C. 76, 92 , 552 S.E.2d 596, 610 (2001) (quoting State v. McNeill, 346 N.C. 233, 239 , 485 S.E.2d 284, 288 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1053 , 139 L. 2001We consistently have held that “ ‘a trial court is not required to repeat verbatim a requested, specific instruction that is correct and supported by the evidence, but that it is sufficient if the court gives the instruction in substantial conformity with the request.’ ” State v. McNeill, 346 N.C. 233, 239 , 485 S.E.2d 284, 288 (1997) (quoting State v. Brown, 335 N.C. 477, 490 , 439 S.E.2d 589, 597 (1994)), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1053 , 139 L. | 2 | 2001–2003 |
State v. Barnes
green
1 sentence2005State v. McQueen, 324 N.C. 118, 142-43 , 377 S.E.2d 38, 52 (1989). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Lloyd
green
2 sentences2003However, “ ‘a trial court is not required to repeat verbatim a requested, specific instruction that is correct and supported by the evidence, ... if the court gives the instruction in substantial conformity with the request.’ ” State v. Lloyd, 354 N.C. 76, 92 , 552 S.E.2d 596, 610 (2001) (quoting State v. McNeill, 346 N.C. 233, 239 , 485 S.E.2d 284, 288 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1053 , 139 L. 2003However, “ ‘a trial court is not required to repeat verbatim a requested, specific instruction that is correct and supported by the evidence, ... if the court gives the instruction in substantial conformity with the request.’ ” State v. Lloyd, 354 N.C. 76, 92 , 552 S.E.2d 596, 610 (2001) (quoting State v. McNeill, 346 N.C. 233, 239 , 485 S.E.2d 284, 288 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1053 , 139 L. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.