Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2009–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mitchell v. Forsythgreen2 sentences2017Bd. of Educ. , 363 N.C. 334 , 337, 678 S.E.2d 351 , 354 (2009) (noting that governmental "immunity is more than a mere affirmative defense, as it shields a defendant entirely from having to answer for its conduct at all in a civil suit for damages" (citing Mitchell v. Forsyth , 472 U.S. 511 , 525, 105 S.Ct. 2806 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985) ). 2017Bd. of Educ. , 363 N.C. 334 , 337, 678 S.E.2d 351 , 354 (2009) (noting that governmental "immunity is more than a mere affirmative defense, as it shields a defendant entirely from having to answer for its conduct at all in a civil suit for damages" (citing Mitchell v. Forsyth , 472 U.S. 511 , 525, 105 S.Ct. 2806 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985) ). | 4 | 5 |
Craig Ex Rel. Craig v. New Hanover County Board of Educationgreen2 sentences2024As this Court has explained, immunity is “more than a mere affirmative defense” to liability—it “shields a defendant entirely from having to answer for” its conduct “in a civil suit for damages.” See id. (discussing governmental immunity); see also Dawes v. Nash County, 357 N.C. 442 , 444–45 (2003) (sovereign immunity); Bartley, 381 N.C. at 294 (public officer immunity). 2017Bd. of Educ. , 363 N.C. 334 , 337, 678 S.E.2d 351 , 354 (2009) (noting that governmental "immunity is more than a mere affirmative defense, as it shields a defendant entirely from having to answer for its conduct at all in a civil suit for damages" (citing Mitchell v. Forsyth , 472 U.S. 511 , 525, 105 S.Ct. 2806 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985) ). | 2 | 7 |
Dawes v. Nash Countygreen1 sentence2024As this Court has explained, immunity is “more than a mere affirmative defense” to liability—it “shields a defendant entirely from having to answer for” its conduct “in a civil suit for damages.” See id. (discussing governmental immunity); see also Dawes v. Nash County, 357 N.C. 442 , 444–45 (2003) (sovereign immunity); Bartley, 381 N.C. at 294 (public officer immunity). | 1 | 1 |
Thompson v. Town of Dallasgreen1 sentence2022See Thompson v. Town of Dallas, 142 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wray v. City of Greensboro
green
1 sentence2024Wray v. City of Greensboro, 247 N.C. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.