10 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1928–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Appeal of AMP Inc.green2 sentences2001If the presumption did not attach, then every taxpayer would have unlimited freedom to challenge the valuation placed upon his property, regardless of the merit of such challenge.” In re Appeal of Amp, Inc., 287 N.C. at 563 , 215 S.E.2d at 762 . 2001If the presumption did not attach, then every taxpayer would have unlimited freedom to challenge the valuation placed upon his property, regardless of the merit of such challenge.” In re Appeal of Amp, Inc., 287 N.C. at 563 , 215 S.E.2d at 762 . | 1 | 2 |
In re L.E.M.green1 sentence2026Discussion A. Termination of Mother’s Parental Rights Mother submits a No Merit brief on appeal, in which her counsel concedes that “the record contains no issue of merit on which to base an argument for relief.” In accordance with Rule 3.1(e), her counsel has identified issues that “might arguably support the appeal” and stated that each “lacks merit or would not alter the ultimate result.” “[A]n independent review will be conducted of the issues identified therein.” In re L.E.M., 372 N.C. 396, 402 (2019). -8- IN RE C.Z.J.T., D.M.J.T., N.D.J.T. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Tunstallgreen2 sentences2009See Tunstall at 329 , 432 S.E.2d at 336 . 2009See Tunstall at 329 , 432 S.E.2d at 336 . | 1 | 1 |
In re the Will of Ridgegreen1 sentence1991See In re Will of Ridge, 47 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bartlett v. Strickland
green
2 sentences2022HALL 2022-NCSC-17 Opinion of the Court districts in which their votes can be effective,’ measured based on ‘the minority’s rough proportion of the relevant population[,]’ ” quoting Bartlett v. Strickland, 556 U.S. 1 , 28–29 (2009) (Souter, J., dissenting). 2022HALL 2022-NCSC-17 Opinion of the Court districts in which their votes can be effective,’ measured based on ‘the minority’s rough proportion of the relevant population[,]’ ” quoting Bartlett v. Strickland, 556 U.S. 1 , 28–29 (2009) (Souter, J., dissenting). | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Bell v. Mutual MacHine Co.
green
2 sentences1931As the defendant in that case defended the action upon the merit of the claim asserted; it was his duty to set up the malpractice complained of as a counterclaim by virtue of the fact that the malpractice grew out of the same contract or transaction which formed the basis of the claim of the plaintiffs. *Page 393 The trial judge was of the opinion that the principle announced in Bell v. Machine Co. , 150 N.C. 111 , 63 S.E. 680 , was determinative of the question of estoppel. 1931As the defendant in that case defended the action upon the merit of the claim asserted; it was his duty to set up the malpractice complained of as a counterclaim by virtue of the fact that the malpractice grew out of the same contract or transaction which formed the basis of the claim of the plaintiffs. *Page 393 The trial judge was of the opinion that the principle announced in Bell v. Machine Co. , 150 N.C. 111 , 63 S.E. 680 , was determinative of the question of estoppel. | 2 | 1931–1931 |
State v. . Butler
neutral
1 sentence1928In our opinion the principle announced in S. v. Butler, 177 N. C., 585 , is determinative of the merit of the exception. | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.