Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1913–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wright v. Cleburne Cnty. Hosp. Bd., Inc.green1 sentence2022Bd., Inc., 255 So. 3d 186, 192 (Ala. 2017) (stating that, "of course, it is the plaintiff who is 'the master of his complaint.' … It is for the court to address the merit of the claim as framed by the plaintiff, not 31 1210353 to reframe it."). | 1 | 1 |
Copeland v. Williamsongreen1 sentence1992See Copeland v. Williamson, 402 So.2d 932 (Ala.1981). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Anniston v. Rosser
green
2 sentences1995With respect to (1) above, the cases of City of Bessemer v. Barnett , 212 Ala. 202 , 102 So. 23 ; Smith v. City of Birmingham , 243 Ala. 124 , 9 So.2d 299 ; City of Birmingham v. Young , 246 Ala. 650 , 22 So.2d 169 ; and City of Anniston v. Rosser , 275 Ala. 659 , 158 So.2d 99 , are authority that the purpose of § 504 is to apprise the city of the accident so it may investigate and determine the merit of the claim, and to adjust the same without the expense of litigation if the circumstances warrant. 1995With respect to (1) above, the cases of City of Bessemer v. Barnett , 212 Ala. 202 , 102 So. 23 ; Smith v. City of Birmingham , 243 Ala. 124 , 9 So.2d 299 ; City of Birmingham v. Young , 246 Ala. 650 , 22 So.2d 169 ; and City of Anniston v. Rosser , 275 Ala. 659 , 158 So.2d 99 , are authority that the purpose of § 504 is to apprise the city of the accident so it may investigate and determine the merit of the claim, and to adjust the same without the expense of litigation if the circumstances warrant. | 2 | 1967–1995 |
Smith v. City of Birmingham
neutral
2 sentences1995With respect to (1) above, the cases of City of Bessemer v. Barnett , 212 Ala. 202 , 102 So. 23 ; Smith v. City of Birmingham , 243 Ala. 124 , 9 So.2d 299 ; City of Birmingham v. Young , 246 Ala. 650 , 22 So.2d 169 ; and City of Anniston v. Rosser , 275 Ala. 659 , 158 So.2d 99 , are authority that the purpose of § 504 is to apprise the city of the accident so it may investigate and determine the merit of the claim, and to adjust the same without the expense of litigation if the circumstances warrant. 1995With respect to (1) above, the cases of City of Bessemer v. Barnett , 212 Ala. 202 , 102 So. 23 ; Smith v. City of Birmingham , 243 Ala. 124 , 9 So.2d 299 ; City of Birmingham v. Young , 246 Ala. 650 , 22 So.2d 169 ; and City of Anniston v. Rosser , 275 Ala. 659 , 158 So.2d 99 , are authority that the purpose of § 504 is to apprise the city of the accident so it may investigate and determine the merit of the claim, and to adjust the same without the expense of litigation if the circumstances warrant. | 2 | 1967–1995 |
City of Birmingham v. Young
neutral
2 sentences1995With respect to (1) above, the cases of City of Bessemer v. Barnett , 212 Ala. 202 , 102 So. 23 ; Smith v. City of Birmingham , 243 Ala. 124 , 9 So.2d 299 ; City of Birmingham v. Young , 246 Ala. 650 , 22 So.2d 169 ; and City of Anniston v. Rosser , 275 Ala. 659 , 158 So.2d 99 , are authority that the purpose of § 504 is to apprise the city of the accident so it may investigate and determine the merit of the claim, and to adjust the same without the expense of litigation if the circumstances warrant. 1995With respect to (1) above, the cases of City of Bessemer v. Barnett , 212 Ala. 202 , 102 So. 23 ; Smith v. City of Birmingham , 243 Ala. 124 , 9 So.2d 299 ; City of Birmingham v. Young , 246 Ala. 650 , 22 So.2d 169 ; and City of Anniston v. Rosser , 275 Ala. 659 , 158 So.2d 99 , are authority that the purpose of § 504 is to apprise the city of the accident so it may investigate and determine the merit of the claim, and to adjust the same without the expense of litigation if the circumstances warrant. | 2 | 1967–1995 |
City of Bessemer v. Barnett
neutral
2 sentences1995With respect to (1) above, the cases of City of Bessemer v. Barnett , 212 Ala. 202 , 102 So. 23 ; Smith v. City of Birmingham , 243 Ala. 124 , 9 So.2d 299 ; City of Birmingham v. Young , 246 Ala. 650 , 22 So.2d 169 ; and City of Anniston v. Rosser , 275 Ala. 659 , 158 So.2d 99 , are authority that the purpose of § 504 is to apprise the city of the accident so it may investigate and determine the merit of the claim, and to adjust the same without the expense of litigation if the circumstances warrant. 1995With respect to (1) above, the cases of City of Bessemer v. Barnett , 212 Ala. 202 , 102 So. 23 ; Smith v. City of Birmingham , 243 Ala. 124 , 9 So.2d 299 ; City of Birmingham v. Young , 246 Ala. 650 , 22 So.2d 169 ; and City of Anniston v. Rosser , 275 Ala. 659 , 158 So.2d 99 , are authority that the purpose of § 504 is to apprise the city of the accident so it may investigate and determine the merit of the claim, and to adjust the same without the expense of litigation if the circumstances warrant. | 2 | 1967–1995 |
Ravi v. Coates
green
1 sentence2017We first acknowledge the holding of Ravi v. Coates , 662 So.2d 218 (Ala. 1995), to which the trial court refers in question 1. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Moore v. Williamson
green
2 sentences1952Moore v. Williamson, 210 Ala. 427 , 98 So. 201 . 1952Moore v. Williamson, 210 Ala. 427 , 98 So. 201 . | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Ex parte Sullivan
neutral
1 sentence1913On the principle above stated it is settled by- precedent in this state that the erroneous refusal of the trial court to allow an amendmant to the complaint may be corrected by mandamus. —Ex parte Sullivan, 106 Ala. 80 , 17 South. 387 . | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.