10 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1933–1985 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. . Copegreen2 sentences1985“But an unintentional violation of a prohibitory statute or ordinance, unaccompanied by recklessness or probable consequences of a dangerous nature, when tested by the rule of reasonable prevision, is not such negligence as imports criminal responsibility.” State v. Cope, 204 N.C. 28, 31 , 167 S.E. 456, 458 (1933). 1985“But an unintentional violation of a prohibitory statute or ordinance, unaccompanied by recklessness or probable consequences of a dangerous nature, when tested by the rule of reasonable prevision, is not such negligence as imports criminal responsibility.” State v. Cope, 204 N.C. 28, 31 , 167 S.E. 456, 458 (1933). | 1 | 2 |
State v. . Lowerygreen2 sentences1985See State v. Lowery, 223 N.C. 598, 603 , 27 S.E. 2d 638, 641 (1943). 1985See State v. Lowery, 223 N.C. 598, 603 , 27 S.E. 2d 638, 641 (1943). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Tingengreen2 sentences1967But an unintentional violation of a prohibitory statute or ordinance, unaccompanied by recklessness or probable consequences of a dangerous nature, when tested by the rule of reasonable prevision, is not such negligence as imports criminal responsibility.” Id. at 31 , 167 S.E. at 458 ; accord, State v. Tingen, 247 N.C. 384 , 100 S.E. 2d 874 . 1967But an unintentional violation of a prohibitory statute or ordinance, unaccompanied by recklessness or probable consequences of a dangerous nature, when tested by the rule of reasonable prevision, is not such negligence as imports criminal responsibility.” Id. at 31 , 167 S.E. at 458 ; accord, State v. Tingen, 247 N.C. 384 , 100 S.E. 2d 874 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. . Agnew
neutral
2 sentences1943S. v. SLansell, supra; S. v. Agnew, 202 N. C., 755 , 164 S. E., 578 ; S. v. Satterfield, 198 N. C., 682 , 153 S. E., 155 ; S. v. Tanhersley, 172 N. C., 955 , 90 S. E., 781 ; S. v. Horton, 139 N. C., 588 , 51 S. E., 945 .” We think tbe evidence as to tbe failure of tbe defendant to give a signal as required by tbe statute, when considered in its most favorable light for tbe State, is insufficient to show culpable negligence. 1943S. v. SLansell, supra; S. v. Agnew, 202 N. C., 755 , 164 S. E., 578 ; S. v. Satterfield, 198 N. C., 682 , 153 S. E., 155 ; S. v. Tanhersley, 172 N. C., 955 , 90 S. E., 781 ; S. v. Horton, 139 N. C., 588 , 51 S. E., 945 .” We think tbe evidence as to tbe failure of tbe defendant to give a signal as required by tbe statute, when considered in its most favorable light for tbe State, is insufficient to show culpable negligence. | 2 | 1933–1943 |
State v. . Satterfield
green
2 sentences1943S. v. SLansell, supra; S. v. Agnew, 202 N. C., 755 , 164 S. E., 578 ; S. v. Satterfield, 198 N. C., 682 , 153 S. E., 155 ; S. v. Tanhersley, 172 N. C., 955 , 90 S. E., 781 ; S. v. Horton, 139 N. C., 588 , 51 S. E., 945 .” We think tbe evidence as to tbe failure of tbe defendant to give a signal as required by tbe statute, when considered in its most favorable light for tbe State, is insufficient to show culpable negligence. 1943S. v. SLansell, supra; S. v. Agnew, 202 N. C., 755 , 164 S. E., 578 ; S. v. Satterfield, 198 N. C., 682 , 153 S. E., 155 ; S. v. Tanhersley, 172 N. C., 955 , 90 S. E., 781 ; S. v. Horton, 139 N. C., 588 , 51 S. E., 945 .” We think tbe evidence as to tbe failure of tbe defendant to give a signal as required by tbe statute, when considered in its most favorable light for tbe State, is insufficient to show culpable negligence. | 2 | 1933–1943 |
State v. . Tankersley
neutral
2 sentences1943S. v. SLansell, supra; S. v. Agnew, 202 N. C., 755 , 164 S. E., 578 ; S. v. Satterfield, 198 N. C., 682 , 153 S. E., 155 ; S. v. Tanhersley, 172 N. C., 955 , 90 S. E., 781 ; S. v. Horton, 139 N. C., 588 , 51 S. E., 945 .” We think tbe evidence as to tbe failure of tbe defendant to give a signal as required by tbe statute, when considered in its most favorable light for tbe State, is insufficient to show culpable negligence. 1943S. v. SLansell, supra; S. v. Agnew, 202 N. C., 755 , 164 S. E., 578 ; S. v. Satterfield, 198 N. C., 682 , 153 S. E., 155 ; S. v. Tanhersley, 172 N. C., 955 , 90 S. E., 781 ; S. v. Horton, 139 N. C., 588 , 51 S. E., 945 .” We think tbe evidence as to tbe failure of tbe defendant to give a signal as required by tbe statute, when considered in its most favorable light for tbe State, is insufficient to show culpable negligence. | 2 | 1933–1943 |
State v. Horton.
green
2 sentences1943S. v. SLansell, supra; S. v. Agnew, 202 N. C., 755 , 164 S. E., 578 ; S. v. Satterfield, 198 N. C., 682 , 153 S. E., 155 ; S. v. Tanhersley, 172 N. C., 955 , 90 S. E., 781 ; S. v. Horton, 139 N. C., 588 , 51 S. E., 945 .” We think tbe evidence as to tbe failure of tbe defendant to give a signal as required by tbe statute, when considered in its most favorable light for tbe State, is insufficient to show culpable negligence. 1943S. v. SLansell, supra; S. v. Agnew, 202 N. C., 755 , 164 S. E., 578 ; S. v. Satterfield, 198 N. C., 682 , 153 S. E., 155 ; S. v. Tanhersley, 172 N. C., 955 , 90 S. E., 781 ; S. v. Horton, 139 N. C., 588 , 51 S. E., 945 .” We think tbe evidence as to tbe failure of tbe defendant to give a signal as required by tbe statute, when considered in its most favorable light for tbe State, is insufficient to show culpable negligence. | 2 | 1933–1943 |
State v. Witherspoon
green
2 sentences1984When the evidence is considered in the light most favorable to the state, as we must do, State v. Witherspoon, 293 N.C. 321 , 237 S.E. 2d 822 (1977), it was sufficient to deny defendant’s motion to dismiss. 1984When the evidence is considered in the light most favorable to the state, as we must do, State v. Witherspoon, 293 N.C. 321 , 237 S.E. 2d 822 (1977), it was sufficient to deny defendant’s motion to dismiss. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
State v. Miday
green
2 sentences1978We find that State v. Miday, 263 N.C. 747 , 140 S.E. 2d 325 (1965), is not controlling, as that case involved an unintentional violation of G.S. 115-166 in which defendant was asserting what he perceived his rights to be under another statute. 1978We find that State v. Miday, 263 N.C. 747 , 140 S.E. 2d 325 (1965), is not controlling, as that case involved an unintentional violation of G.S. 115-166 in which defendant was asserting what he perceived his rights to be under another statute. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Williams v. Boulerice
neutral
2 sentences1972See the following cases in which the court held the evidence failed to support jury instructions on reckless driving: Roberts v. Freight Carriers, 273 N.C. 600 , 160 S.E. 2d 712 (1968); Williams v. Boulerice, 269 N.C. 499 , 153 S.E. 2d 95 (1967); Wilder v. Edwards, 7 N.C. 1972See the following cases in which the court held the evidence failed to support jury instructions on reckless driving: Roberts v. Freight Carriers, 273 N.C. 600 , 160 S.E. 2d 712 (1968); Williams v. Boulerice, 269 N.C. 499 , 153 S.E. 2d 95 (1967); Wilder v. Edwards, 7 N.C. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Wilder v. Edwards
neutral
1 sentence1972See the following cases in which the court held the evidence failed to support jury instructions on reckless driving: Roberts v. Freight Carriers, 273 N.C. 600 , 160 S.E. 2d 712 (1968); Williams v. Boulerice, 269 N.C. 499 , 153 S.E. 2d 95 (1967); Wilder v. Edwards, 7 N.C. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Roberts v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.
green
2 sentences1972See the following cases in which the court held the evidence failed to support jury instructions on reckless driving: Roberts v. Freight Carriers, 273 N.C. 600 , 160 S.E. 2d 712 (1968); Williams v. Boulerice, 269 N.C. 499 , 153 S.E. 2d 95 (1967); Wilder v. Edwards, 7 N.C. 1972See the following cases in which the court held the evidence failed to support jury instructions on reckless driving: Roberts v. Freight Carriers, 273 N.C. 600 , 160 S.E. 2d 712 (1968); Williams v. Boulerice, 269 N.C. 499 , 153 S.E. 2d 95 (1967); Wilder v. Edwards, 7 N.C. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
State v. Hancock
green
2 sentences1962S. v. Hancock, 248 N.C. 432 , 103 S.E. 2d 491 ; S. v. Roof, 255 N.C. 607 , 122 S.E. 2d 363 . 1962S. v. Hancock, 248 N.C. 432 , 103 S.E. 2d 491 ; S. v. Roof, 255 N.C. 607 , 122 S.E. 2d 363 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
State v. Roop
green
2 sentences1962S. v. Hancock, 248 N.C. 432 , 103 S.E. 2d 491 ; S. v. Roof, 255 N.C. 607 , 122 S.E. 2d 363 . 1962S. v. Hancock, 248 N.C. 432 , 103 S.E. 2d 491 ; S. v. Roof, 255 N.C. 607 , 122 S.E. 2d 363 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
State v. Spivey
neutral
2 sentences1958In the case of S. v. Spivey, 230 N.C. 375 , 53 S.E. 2d 259 , the evidence tended to show that the defendant was intoxicated and that the collision between his automobile and that of a motorcycle, resulting in the death of the cyclist, occurred on the defendant’s left side of the highway. 1958In the case of S. v. Spivey, 230 N.C. 375 , 53 S.E. 2d 259 , the evidence tended to show that the defendant was intoxicated and that the collision between his automobile and that of a motorcycle, resulting in the death of the cyclist, occurred on the defendant’s left side of the highway. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
State v. . Stansell
green
2 sentences1958J., speaking for the Court, said: “The violation of a statute or ordinance, intended and designed to prevent injury to persons or property, whether done intentionally or otherwise, is negligence per se, and renders one civilly liable in damages, if its violation proximately result in injury to another; for, in such case, the statute or ordinance becomes the standard of conduct or the rule of the prudent man. * * * “An intentional, wilful or wanton violation of a statute or ordinance, designed for the protection of human life or limb, which proximately results in injury or death, is culpable ne 1958J., speaking for the Court, said: “The violation of a statute or ordinance, intended and designed to prevent injury to persons or property, whether done intentionally or otherwise, is negligence per se, and renders one civilly liable in damages, if its violation proximately result in injury to another; for, in such case, the statute or ordinance becomes the standard of conduct or the rule of the prudent man. * * * “An intentional, wilful or wanton violation of a statute or ordinance, designed for the protection of human life or limb, which proximately results in injury or death, is culpable ne | 1 | 1958–1958 |
State v. . Smith
green
2 sentences1954S. v. Davis, 225 N.C. 117 , 33 S.E. 2d 623 ; S. v. Hunt, 223 N.C. 173 , 25 S.E. 2d 598 ; S. v. Smith, 221 N.C. 400 , 20 S.E. 2d 360 ; S. v. Elmore, 212 N.C. 531 , 193 S.E. 713 . 1954S. v. Davis, 225 N.C. 117 , 33 S.E. 2d 623 ; S. v. Hunt, 223 N.C. 173 , 25 S.E. 2d 598 ; S. v. Smith, 221 N.C. 400 , 20 S.E. 2d 360 ; S. v. Elmore, 212 N.C. 531 , 193 S.E. 713 . | 1 | 1954–1954 |
State v. . Elmore
neutral
2 sentences1954S. v. Davis, 225 N.C. 117 , 33 S.E. 2d 623 ; S. v. Hunt, 223 N.C. 173 , 25 S.E. 2d 598 ; S. v. Smith, 221 N.C. 400 , 20 S.E. 2d 360 ; S. v. Elmore, 212 N.C. 531 , 193 S.E. 713 . 1954S. v. Davis, 225 N.C. 117 , 33 S.E. 2d 623 ; S. v. Hunt, 223 N.C. 173 , 25 S.E. 2d 598 ; S. v. Smith, 221 N.C. 400 , 20 S.E. 2d 360 ; S. v. Elmore, 212 N.C. 531 , 193 S.E. 713 . | 1 | 1954–1954 |
State v. . Hunt
green
2 sentences1954S. v. Davis, 225 N.C. 117 , 33 S.E. 2d 623 ; S. v. Hunt, 223 N.C. 173 , 25 S.E. 2d 598 ; S. v. Smith, 221 N.C. 400 , 20 S.E. 2d 360 ; S. v. Elmore, 212 N.C. 531 , 193 S.E. 713 . 1954S. v. Davis, 225 N.C. 117 , 33 S.E. 2d 623 ; S. v. Hunt, 223 N.C. 173 , 25 S.E. 2d 598 ; S. v. Smith, 221 N.C. 400 , 20 S.E. 2d 360 ; S. v. Elmore, 212 N.C. 531 , 193 S.E. 713 . | 1 | 1954–1954 |
State v. . Davis
neutral
2 sentences1954S. v. Davis, 225 N.C. 117 , 33 S.E. 2d 623 ; S. v. Hunt, 223 N.C. 173 , 25 S.E. 2d 598 ; S. v. Smith, 221 N.C. 400 , 20 S.E. 2d 360 ; S. v. Elmore, 212 N.C. 531 , 193 S.E. 713 . 1954S. v. Davis, 225 N.C. 117 , 33 S.E. 2d 623 ; S. v. Hunt, 223 N.C. 173 , 25 S.E. 2d 598 ; S. v. Smith, 221 N.C. 400 , 20 S.E. 2d 360 ; S. v. Elmore, 212 N.C. 531 , 193 S.E. 713 . | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.