7 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1994–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Reyna v. Stategreen2 sentences2012Sena, ¶ 9, 233 P.3d at 996 , citing Reyna v. State, 2001 WY 105, ¶ 9 , 33 P.3d 1129, 1132 (Wyo.2001). 2012Sena, ¶ 9, 233 P.3d at 996 , citing Reyna v. State, 2001 WY 105, ¶ 9 , 33 P.3d 1129, 1132 (Wyo.2001). | 3 | 3 |
McCarty v. Stategreen2 sentences2010Reyna v. State, 2001 WY 105, ¶ 9 , 33 P.3d 1129, 1132 (Wyo.2001); McCarty v. State, 883 P.2d 367, 372 (Wyo.1994). 1998Rather, the goal is to make sure that the Defendant “is not misled into an unintentional waiver of substantial rights.” McCarty , at 372. | 3 | 3 |
Van Haele v. Stategreen1 sentence2010We examine the procedure utilized to accept a guilty plea as a whole to determine if the trial court "sufficiently described the nature of the charges, including the possible penalties; informed the defendant of the right to representation; informed the defendant of the rights waived by a guilty plea; and obtained a factual basis for the plea." Id.[, ¶ 11, 90 P.3d at 711 (emphasis omitted).] These procedural requirements are intended to assure that the defendant is not misled into an unintentional waiver of substantial rights. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. State
green
2 sentences2004Id. 2001Id. | 2 | 2001–2004 |
Sena v. State
green
1 sentence2012Sena, ¶ 9, 233 P.3d at 996 , citing Reyna v. State, 2001 WY 105, ¶ 9 , 33 P.3d 1129, 1132 (Wyo.2001). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Mehring v. State
green
1 sentence1994Id. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.