Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New York opinions name it 3 courts 1910–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
TNS Holdings, Inc. v. MKI Securities Corp.green2 sentences2015Corp., 92 NY2d 335, 339 [1998] [citations omitted]). “[A] party will not be compelled to arbitrate . . . absent evidence which affirmatively establishes that the parties expressly *566 agreed to arbitrate their disputes. 2015Corp., 92 NY2d 335, 339 [1998] [citation omitted]). | 2 | 2 |
Nichols v. VanAmerongengreen1 sentence2011The Hearing Officer, however, rejected her explanation, and such credibility determinations fall within the province of the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Nichols v VanAmerongen, 72 AD3d 1499, 1500 [2010]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith Barney Shearson Inc. v. Sacharow
green
1 sentence1998The Appellate Division granted defendants leave to appeal to this Court, and we now reverse. *339 IL Although arbitration is favored as a matter of public policy (see, Matter of Smith Barney Shearson v Sacharow, 91 NY2d 39, 49 ), equally important is the policy that seeks to avoid the unintentional waiver of the benefits and safeguards which a court of law may provide in resolving disputes. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Renda v. Frazer
green
1 sentence1986(Renda v Frazer, 75 AD2d 490 .) In this regard this case is unlike the situation in Simcuski v Saeli (supra), in which the two causes of action, the malpractice and the concealment of the malpractice were consistent. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Cheatham v. Westchester County Publishers, Inc.
green
1 sentence1960The word “mistake” has been defined as ‘ ‘ An apprehending wrongly; a misconception; a misunderstanding * * * A fault in opinion or judgment; an unintentional error.” (Webster’s New International Dictionary of the English Language [2d ed.], [unabridged].) It clearly does not connote a meaning of dishonesty (Cheatham v. Westchester County Publishers, 20 Misc 2d 770 ). | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Mahley v. . German Bank
neutral
1 sentence1910The Lien Law is “ to be construed liberally to secure the beneficial interests and purposes thereof,” and “ A substantial compliance with- its several provisions shall be sufficient for the validity of a -lion and to give jurisdiction to the courts to enforce the same.” (Id. § 22.) If the notice had contained no statement as to the date when the last material was furnished or the last labor performed, it would have been invalid. ’ (Mahley v. German Bank, 174 N. Y. 499 .) But when it purports to state the date of furnishing the last item of work and material, if an unintentional error in statin | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.