Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Nebraska opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Farnsworth v. Farnsworthgreen2 sentences2018In our de novo review of the evidence related to the quality of life factors, the evidence supports the district court's finding that Lily would "have a better quality of life" if she lived with Shaan in Arizona. *541 (iii) Impact on Noncustodial Parent's Visitation Consideration of the impact of removal of children to another jurisdiction on the noncustodial parent's visitation "focuses on the ability of the noncustodial parent to maintain a meaningful parent-child relationship." Farnsworth , 257 Neb. at 251 , 597 N.W.2d at 599 . 2018In our de novo review of the evidence related to the quality of life factors, the evidence supports the district court's finding that Lily would "have a better quality of life" if she lived with Shaan in Arizona. *541 (iii) Impact on Noncustodial Parent's Visitation Consideration of the impact of removal of children to another jurisdiction on the noncustodial parent's visitation "focuses on the ability of the noncustodial parent to maintain a meaningful parent-child relationship." Farnsworth , 257 Neb. at 251 , 597 N.W.2d at 599 . | 2 | 3 |
McLaughlin v. McLaughlingreen2 sentences2020See McLaughlin v. McLaughlin, 264 Neb. 232 , 647 N.W.2d 577 (2002). 2020See McLaughlin v. McLaughlin, 264 Neb. 232 , 647 N.W.2d 577 (2002). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Korth v. Korth
green
2 sentences2022Korth v. Korth, 309 Neb. 115 , 958 N.W.2d 683 (2021). 2022Korth v. Korth, 309 Neb. 115 , 958 N.W.2d 683 (2021). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Maranville v. Dworak
green
1 sentence2020Maranville v. Dworak, 17 Neb. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Speers v. Johns
green
1 sentence2020Speers v. John, 26 Neb. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Welch v. Peery
green
1 sentence2019Given the evidence presented at the modification hearing, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion in reaching its conclusion. - 985 - Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets 26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports WELCH v. PEERY Cite as 26 Neb. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Kashyap v. Kashyap
green
1 sentence2018In our de novo review of the evidence related to the quality of life factors, the evidence supports the district court’s find- ing that Lily would “have a better quality of life” if she lived with Shaan in Arizona. - 541 - Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets 26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports KASHYAP v. KASHYAP Cite as 26 Neb. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Dragon v. Dragon
green
1 sentence2013Upon our review, we find Kendra has relationships with individuals in both New Mexico and Nebraska, and this factor weighs only slightly against removal. (viii) Likelihood That Allowing or Denying Move Would Antagonize Hostilities Between Parties We find that either granting or denying removal has the potential to antagonize hostilities between the parties, so we do not find this factor weighs in favor of or against removal. (ix) Conclusion Regarding Quality of Life After considering all of the quality-of-life factors, we conclude upon our de novo review that Melanie established Decisions of t | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.