statute enumerates various factors (New Hampshire) · Go Syfert
← New Hampshire issues

statute enumerates various factors in New Hampshire

10 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 2003–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
In re Crowegreen
nh · 2002 · cited in 7 New Hampshire opinions naming this issue, 2003–2020
2 sentences

2020“The statute enumerates various factors for the court to consider, such as the length of the marriage, the ability of the parties to provide for their own needs, the needs of the custodial parent, the contribution of each party during the marriage and the value of property contributed by each party.” In the Matter of Crowe & Crowe, 148 N.H. 218, 221 (2002); see RSA 458:16-a, II.

2012“The statute enumerates various factors for the court to consider, such as the length of the marriage, the ability of the parties to provide for their own needs, the needs of the custodial parent, the contribution of each party during the marriage and the value of property contributed by each party.” In the Matter of Crowe & Crowe, 148 N.H. 218, 221 (2002); see RSA 458:16-a, II (2004).

57

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
In re Heinrich green
nh · 2012
2 sentences

2015“The statute enumerates various factors for the court to consider, such as the length of the marriage, the ability of the parties to provide for their own needs, . . . the contribution of each party during the marriage and the value of property contributed by each party.” Id. (quotation omitted).

2015RSA 458:16-a, IV (2004) requires the trial court to “specify written reasons for the division of property which it orders.” See id. at 364 . 4 In this case, the trial court, in rejecting both parties’ proposed final decrees, stated that it was concerned that neither party’s proposed order properly considered the length of the marriage, the parties’ contributions to the marital estate, each party’s services as a “homemaker/provider,” the assets brought into the marriage, and the steps each party took to maintain the marital estate during the marriage.

12015–2015
In Re Salesky green
nh · 2008
1 sentence

2015Id.

12015–2015
In re Henry green
nh · 2012
1 sentence

2012“The statute enumerates various factors for the court to consider, such as the length of the marriage, the ability of the parties to provide for their own needs, the needs of the custodial parent, the contribution of each party during the marriage and the value of property contributed by each party.” Id. (quotation omitted); see RSA 458:16-a, II.

12012–2012

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NH § N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 458:16-a (10) NH § N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 458:19 (5) NH § N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 458:7 (5) NH § N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 458-C:2 (3) NH § N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 458:16 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check