Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Discipline of Lernergreen2 sentences2021A reprimand is appropriate In determining the appropriate discipline, this court weighs four factors: "the duty violated, the lawyer's mental state, the potential or actual injury caused by the lawyer's misconduct, and the existence of aggravating or mitigating factors." In re Discipline of Lerner, 124 Nev. 1232, 1246 , 197 P.3d 1067, 1077 (2008). 2021A reprimand is appropriate In determining the appropriate discipline, this court weighs four factors: "the duty violated, the lawyer's mental state, the potential or actual injury caused by the lawyer's misconduct, and the existence of aggravating or mitigating factors." In re Discipline of Lerner, 124 Nev. 1232, 1246 , 197 P.3d 1067, 1077 (2008). | 8 | 9 |
In Re Discipline of Schaefergreen2 sentences2021Although this court determines the appropriate discipline de novo, SCR 105(3)(b), the hearing panel's recommendation is persuasive, Discipline of Schaefer, 117 Nev. at 515 , 25 P.3d at 204 .9 8If the hearing had been improper as Arabia alleged, that would have been determined in due course, instead of the hearing being canceled on the advice of someone who had a personal interest in the hearing never occurring. 2021Although this court determines the appropriate discipline de novo, SCR 105(3)(b), the hearing panel's recommendation is persuasive, Discipline of Schaefer, 117 Nev. at 515 , 25 P.3d at 204 .9 8If the hearing had been improper as Arabia alleged, that would have been determined in due course, instead of the hearing being canceled on the advice of someone who had a personal interest in the hearing never occurring. | 3 | 3 |
State Bar of Nevada v. Claibornegreen2 sentences2016See SCR 105(3)(b) (providing that this court's review of recommended discipline is de novo); State Bar of Nev. v. Claiborne, 104 Nev. 115, 213 , 756 P.2d 464, 527-28 (1988) (noting purpose SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 10) 1947A e of attorney discipline); In re Discipline of Lerner, 124 Nev. 1232, 1246 , 197 P.3d 1067, 1077 (2008) (explaining that this court weighs four factors in determining discipline: "the duty violated, the lawyer's mental state, the potential or actual injury caused by the lawyer's misconduct, and the existence of aggravating or mitigating factors"). 2016See SCR 105(3)(b) (providing that this court's review of recommended discipline is de novo); State Bar of Nev. v. Claiborne, 104 Nev. 115, 213 , 756 P.2d 464, 527-28 (1988) (noting purpose SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 10) 1947A e of attorney discipline); In re Discipline of Lerner, 124 Nev. 1232, 1246 , 197 P.3d 1067, 1077 (2008) (explaining that this court weighs four factors in determining discipline: "the duty violated, the lawyer's mental state, the potential or actual injury caused by the lawyer's misconduct, and the existence of aggravating or mitigating factors"). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Village Builders 96, L. P. v. U.S. Laboratories, Inc.
green
2 sentences2018In order to determine whether a party has established a prima facie case for de facto merger, this court weighs four factors equally: "(1) whether there is a continuation of the enterprise, (2) whether there is a continuity of shareholders, (3) whether the seller corporation ceased its ordinary business operations, and (4) whether the purchasing corporation assumed the seller's obligations." Id. at 269-70 , 112 P.3d at 1087-88 . 2018In order to determine whether a party has established a prima facie case for de facto merger, this court weighs four factors equally: "(1) whether there is a continuation of the enterprise, (2) whether there is a continuity of shareholders, (3) whether the seller corporation ceased its ordinary business operations, and (4) whether the purchasing corporation assumed the seller's obligations." Id. at 269-70 , 112 P.3d at 1087-88 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.