Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 New York opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kuci v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authoritygreen2 sentences2017Operating Auth., 88 NY2d 923, 924 [1996]; see Rivera v New York City Tr. 2017Operating Auth., 88 NY2d 923, 924 [1996]; Caristo v Sanzone, 96 NY2d 172, 175 [2001]; Rivera v New York City Tr. | 4 | 6 |
Caristo v. Sanzonegreen2 sentences2017Operating Auth., 88 NY2d 923, 924 [1996]; Caristo v Sanzone, 96 NY2d 172, 175 [2001]; Rivera v New York City Tr. 2013Operating Auth., 88 NY2d 923, 924 [1996]), based upon Brittany’s testimony, there is a reasonable view of the evidence that her conduct was the product of a “ ‘sudden and unexpected circumstance’ ” (Lifson v City of Syracuse, 17 NY3d at 497 , quoting Caristo v Sanzone, 96 NY2d at 174 ). | 1 | 4 |
Mas v. Two Bridges Associatesgreen1 sentence1991Viewing the evidence, as we must, in the light most favorably towards giving the requested emergency doctrine instruction to the jury, we conclude that it was reversible error for the trial court to deny the TA’s request (Ferrer v Harris, 55 NY2d 285, 293 , remittitur amended 56 NY2d 737 ; see also, Mas v Two Bridges Assocs., 75 NY2d 680, 686-687 ; PJI 2:14). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rivera v. New York City Transit Authority
green
2 sentences2019Auth. , 77 NY2d 322, 326 ), we agree with Yousuf that the Supreme Court should not have denied his request. 2002Auth., 77 NY2d 322, 326 , rearg denied 77 NY2d 990 ), we conclude that “there is [a] reasonable view of the evidence supporting the occurrence of a ‘qualifying emergency ” (Caristo v Sanzone, 96 NY2d 172, 175 ). | 3 | 1996–2019 |
Lifson v. City of Syracuse
green
2 sentences2013Operating Auth., 88 NY2d 923, 924 [1996]), based upon Brittany’s testimony, there is a reasonable view of the evidence that her conduct was the product of a “ ‘sudden and unexpected circumstance’ ” (Lifson v City of Syracuse, 17 NY3d at 497 , quoting Caristo v Sanzone, 96 NY2d at 174 ). 2013Operating Auth., 88 NY2d 923, 924 [1996]), based upon Brittany’s testimony, there is a reasonable view of the evidence that her conduct was the product of a “ ‘sudden and unexpected circumstance’ ” (Lifson v City of Syracuse, 17 NY3d at 497 , quoting Caristo v Sanzone, 96 NY2d at 174 ). | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Rowlands v. Parks
green
1 sentence1991This doctrine recognizes that when an actor is faced with a sudden and unexpected circumstance which leaves little or no time for thought, deliberation or consideration, or causes the actor to be reasonably so disturbed that the actor must make a speedy decision without weighing alternative courses of conduct, the actor may not be negligent if the actions taken are reasonable and prudent in the emergency context (Amaro v City of New York, 40 NY2d 30, 36 ; Rowlands v Parks, 2 NY2d 64, 67 ; see also, PJI 2:14). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Amaro v. City of New York
green
1 sentence1991This doctrine recognizes that when an actor is faced with a sudden and unexpected circumstance which leaves little or no time for thought, deliberation or consideration, or causes the actor to be reasonably so disturbed that the actor must make a speedy decision without weighing alternative courses of conduct, the actor may not be negligent if the actions taken are reasonable and prudent in the emergency context (Amaro v City of New York, 40 NY2d 30, 36 ; Rowlands v Parks, 2 NY2d 64, 67 ; see also, PJI 2:14). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
People v. Jenkins
green
1 sentence1991Viewing the evidence, as we must, in the light most favorably towards giving the requested emergency doctrine instruction to the jury, we conclude that it was reversible error for the trial court to deny the TA’s request (Ferrer v Harris, 55 NY2d 285, 293 , remittitur amended 56 NY2d 737 ; see also, Mas v Two Bridges Assocs., 75 NY2d 680, 686-687 ; PJI 2:14). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Ferrer v. Harris
green
1 sentence1991Viewing the evidence, as we must, in the light most favorably towards giving the requested emergency doctrine instruction to the jury, we conclude that it was reversible error for the trial court to deny the TA’s request (Ferrer v Harris, 55 NY2d 285, 293 , remittitur amended 56 NY2d 737 ; see also, Mas v Two Bridges Assocs., 75 NY2d 680, 686-687 ; PJI 2:14). | 1 | 1991–1991 |