Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2025The State also notes that Savage did not object at sentencing to the fines imposed and that the record shows that the trial court properly considered Savage’s ability to pay the fines and costs. {¶ 53} “Ordinarily, a failure to bring an error to the attention of the trial court at a time when the court could correct that error constitutes a waiver of all but plain error.” State v. Johnson, 2005-Ohio-6826, ¶ 22 (2d Dist.), citing State v. Wickline, 50 Ohio St.3d 114 (1990). 2024Ross No. 19CA3698, 2021- Ohio-416, ¶ 50 (“the failure to request a curative instruction at trial forfeits all but plain error on appeal”); State v. Johnson, 164 Ohio App.3d 792 , 2005-Ohio-6826 , 844 N.E.2d 372, ¶ 22 (2d Dist.) (“[o]rdinarily, a failure to bring an error to the attention of the trial court at a time when the court could correct that error constitutes a waiver of all but plain error”), citing State v. Wickline, 50 Ohio St.3d 114 , 552 N.E.2d 913 (1990). {¶ 45} Crim.R. 52(B) provides appellate courts with discretion to correct “[p]lain errors or defects affecting substantial rig | 6 | 9 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wickline
green
2 sentences2025The State also notes that Savage did not object at sentencing to the fines imposed and that the record shows that the trial court properly considered Savage’s ability to pay the fines and costs. {¶ 53} “Ordinarily, a failure to bring an error to the attention of the trial court at a time when the court could correct that error constitutes a waiver of all but plain error.” State v. Johnson, 2005-Ohio-6826, ¶ 22 (2d Dist.), citing State v. Wickline, 50 Ohio St.3d 114 (1990). 2024Ross No. 19CA3698, 2021- Ohio-416, ¶ 50 (“the failure to request a curative instruction at trial forfeits all but plain error on appeal”); State v. Johnson, 164 Ohio App.3d 792 , 2005-Ohio-6826 , 844 N.E.2d 372, ¶ 22 (2d Dist.) (“[o]rdinarily, a failure to bring an error to the attention of the trial court at a time when the court could correct that error constitutes a waiver of all but plain error”), citing State v. Wickline, 50 Ohio St.3d 114 , 552 N.E.2d 913 (1990). {¶ 45} Crim.R. 52(B) provides appellate courts with discretion to correct “[p]lain errors or defects affecting substantial rig | 7 | 2005–2025 |
State v. Townsend
green
2 sentences2024Ross No. 19CA3698, 2021- Ohio-416, ¶ 50 (“the failure to request a curative instruction at trial forfeits all but plain error on appeal”); State v. Johnson, 164 Ohio App.3d 792 , 2005-Ohio-6826 , 844 N.E.2d 372, ¶ 22 (2d Dist.) (“[o]rdinarily, a failure to bring an error to the attention of the trial court at a time when the court could correct that error constitutes a waiver of all but plain error”), citing State v. Wickline, 50 Ohio St.3d 114 , 552 N.E.2d 913 (1990). {¶ 45} Crim.R. 52(B) provides appellate courts with discretion to correct “[p]lain errors or defects affecting substantial rig 2024The State also argues that the trial court did, in fact, consider Moore’s financial ability. {¶ 14} “Ordinarily, a failure to bring an error to the attention of the trial court at a time when the court could correct that error constitutes a waiver of all but plain error.” State v. Johnson, 164 Ohio App.3d 792 , 2005-Ohio-6826 , 844 N.E.2d 372, ¶ 22 (2d Dist.), quoting State v. Wickline, 50 Ohio St.3d 114 , 552 N.E.2d 913 (1990). | 6 | 2005–2024 |
State v. Long
green
2 sentences2025“Plain error does not exist unless it can be said that but for the error, the outcome of the trial would clearly have been different.” Id. at ¶ 23, citing State v. Long, -23- 53 Ohio St.2d 91 (1987) and Wickline. 2024“Notice of plain error under Crim.R. 52(B) is to be taken with the utmost caution, under exceptional circumstances and only to prevent a manifest miscarriage of justice.” State v. Long, 53 Ohio St.2d 91 , 372 N.E.2d 804 (1978), paragraph three of the syllabus. | 2 | 2024–2025 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.