Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Alvarez, 4-08-02 (10-6-2008)green2 sentences2009Accord, [ State v. Alvarez , Defiance App. No. 4-08-02, 2008-Ohio-5189 ]." {¶ 40} We find the same analysis applies to the instant matter. 2008Accord, Alvarez , supra at ¶ 22, fn. 1 . | 2 | 2 |
State v. Montgomerygreen1 sentence2025See State v. Montgomery, 2022-Ohio-2211, ¶ 33 (A finding of structural error resulted in a reversal of the defendant’s conviction and a remand to the trial court for a new trial.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Martin
green
2 sentences2024State v. Martin, 103 Ohio St.3d 385 , 2004-Ohio-5471 , ¶ 53 (Moyer, J., concurring in judgment only). 2020State v. Martin, 103 Ohio St.3d 385 , 2004-Ohio-5471 , ¶ 53 (Moyer, J., concurring in judgment only), citing Perry at ¶ 18, citing Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461, 468 , 117 S.Ct. 1544 (1997). | 4 | 2016–2024 |
Johnson v. United States
green
2 sentences2020State v. Martin, 103 Ohio St.3d 385 , 2004-Ohio-5471 , ¶ 53 (Moyer, J., concurring in judgment only), citing Perry at ¶ 18, citing Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461, 468 , 117 S.Ct. 1544 (1997). 2020State v. Martin, 103 Ohio St.3d 385 , 2004-Ohio-5471 , ¶ 53 (Moyer, J., concurring in judgment only), citing Perry at ¶ 18, citing Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461, 468 , 117 S.Ct. 1544 (1997). | 4 | 2004–2020 |
People v. Gibson
green
1 sentence2026In People v. Gibson, 90 Mich. App. 792 (1979) (see Appellant’s Reply Brief at 8), the trial court judge explicitly stated during the bench trial of one defendant that his yet-to-be-tried co-defendant had committed the charged crime; this was found to constitute prejudgment warranting sua sponte recusal from the co-defendant’s trial. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Joseph
green
2 sentences2008State v. Joseph (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 450 , 455 , 653 N.E.2d 285 . 2008State v. Joseph (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 450 , 455 , 653 N.E.2d 285 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Perry
green
2 sentences2004Perry, 101 Ohio St.3d 118 , 2004-Ohio-297 , 802 N.E.2d 643, ¶ 18 , citing Johnson v. United States (1997), 520 U.S. 461, 468 , 117 S.Ct. 1544 , 137 L.Ed.2d 718 . 2004Perry, 101 Ohio St.3d 118 , 2004-Ohio-297 , 802 N.E.2d 643, ¶ 18 , citing Johnson v. United States (1997), 520 U.S. 461, 468 , 117 S.Ct. 1544 , 137 L.Ed.2d 718 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.