10 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1927–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Swyden Construction Company v. Whitegreen2 sentences2014See also Swyden Const. Co. v. White, 1963 OK 162 , 383 P.2d 674, 675 (The existence of an employee-employer relationship constitutes a primary prerequisite to an award, and claimant has the burden to establish the status of an employee in relation to the person against whom a claim is asserted.). 2014See also Swyden Const. Co. v. White, 1963 OK 162 , 383 P.2d 674, 675 (The existence of an employee-employer relationship constitutes a primary prerequisite to an award, and claimant has the burden to establish the status of an employee in relation to the person against whom a claim is asserted.). | 2 | 2 |
Hadley v. Farmers Nat. Bank of Oklahoma Citygreen1 sentence2011Hadley v. Farmers' Nat'l Bank of Oklahoma City, 1927 OK 188 , 257 P. 1101, 11083 (quoting with approval Cye., vol. 30, at 1308). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts
green
2 sentences1990Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130, 143 , 87 S.Ct. 1975, 1985 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1094 [1967]. 1990Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130, 143 , 87 S.Ct. 1975, 1985 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1094 [1967]. | 2 | 1989–1990 |
Carter Oil Co. v. Independent Torpedo Co.
green
2 sentences1959Carter Oil Co. v. Independent Torpedo Co., 107 Okl. 209 , 232 P. 419 . 1959Carter Oil Co. v. Independent Torpedo Co., 107 Okl. 209 , 232 P. 419 . | 2 | 1958–1959 |
McLain v. Oklahoma Cotton Growers' Ass'n
neutral
1 sentence2011Hadley v. Farmers' Nat'l Bank of Oklahoma City, 1927 OK 188 , 257 P. 1101, 11083 (quoting with approval Cye., vol. 30, at 1308). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Mahl v. McMahan
neutral
1 sentence1963Mahl v. McMahan, Okl., 325 P.2d 78 ; Nichols v. State Industrial Commission, 207 Okl. 167 , 248 P.2d 616 . | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Nichols v. State Industrial Commission
green
2 sentences1963Mahl v. McMahan, Okl., 325 P.2d 78 ; Nichols v. State Industrial Commission, 207 Okl. 167 , 248 P.2d 616 . 1963Mahl v. McMahan, Okl., 325 P.2d 78 ; Nichols v. State Industrial Commission, 207 Okl. 167 , 248 P.2d 616 . | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Peoples Exchange Bank v. Miller
green
2 sentences1947Jur. p. 221 , sec. 18, as follows: “The modern and better rule is that an accord and satisfaction made with one who is a stranger to the transaction to which it relates is good, and will bar an action on the claim involved, if the person against whom the claim was made has either authorized or ratified the settlement.” An illustration of the application of the rule announced is to be found in People’s Exchange Bank of Elmdale v. Miller, 139 Kan. 3 , 29 P. 2d 1079 . 1947Jur. p. 221 , sec. 18, as follows: “The modern and better rule is that an accord and satisfaction made with one who is a stranger to the transaction to which it relates is good, and will bar an action on the claim involved, if the person against whom the claim was made has either authorized or ratified the settlement.” An illustration of the application of the rule announced is to be found in People’s Exchange Bank of Elmdale v. Miller, 139 Kan. 3 , 29 P. 2d 1079 . | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Schaff v. Hudgins
neutral
1 sentence1927In the case of Schaff v. Hudgins, 96 Okla, 173 221 Pac. 90 , the action was for damages to a shipment of cattle, where a portion of them were killed and others were injured as in this case. | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.