Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 2021–2022 10 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ciraulogreen2 sentences2022See, e.g., State v. Ciraulo, 367 Or 350, 354 , 478 P3d 502 (2020), cert den, 594 US ___ , 141 S Ct 2836 , 210 L Ed 2d 950 (2021) (concluding that an erroneous nonunanimous jury instruction was “harmless beyond a reasonable doubt” when the verdicts were unani- mous). 2022See, e.g., State v. Ciraulo, 367 Or 350, 354 , 478 P3d 502 (2020), cert den, 594 US ___ , 141 S Ct 2836 , 210 L Ed 2d 950 (2021) (concluding that an erroneous nonunanimous jury instruction was “harmless beyond a reasonable doubt” when the verdicts were unani- mous). | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Flores Ramos
green
2 sentences2021We reject that argument for the reasons set forth in State v. Flores Ramos, 367 Or 292 , 478 P3d 515 (2020), in which the court concluded that the erroneous nonunanimous jury instruction was harmless with respect to unanimous verdicts. 2021We reject that argument for the reasons set forth in State v. Flores Ramos, 367 Or 292 , 478 P3d 515 (2020), in which the court concluded that the erroneous nonunanimous jury instruction was harmless with respect to unanimous verdicts. | 9 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Kincheloe
green
2 sentences2021We reject that argument for the reasons set forth in State v. Flores Ramos, 367 Or 292 , 478 P3d 515 (2020), and State v. Kincheloe, 367 Or 335 , 478 P3d 507 (2020), in which the court concluded that the erroneous nonunanimous jury instruction was harmless with respect to unanimous verdicts. 2021We reject that argument for the reasons set forth in State v. Flores Ramos, 367 Or 292 , 478 P3d 515 (2020), and State v. Kincheloe, 367 Or 335 , 478 P3d 507 (2020), in which the court concluded that the erroneous nonunanimous jury instruction was harmless with respect to unanimous verdicts. | 2 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Dilallo
green
2 sentences2021The Oregon Supreme Court addressed that question with respect to unpreserved claims of error in State v. Dilallo, 367 Or 340 , 478 P3d 509 (2020). 2021The Oregon Supreme Court addressed that question with respect to unpreserved claims of error in State v. Dilallo, 367 Or 340 , 478 P3d 509 (2020). | 1 | 2021–2021 |