Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 2022–2025 10 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Street
green
2 sentences2023We review the denial of an MJOA for legal error, including where the “challenge to the legal sufficiency of the state’s evidence depends upon the meaning of the statute defining the offense.” Street, 317 Or App at 4 . 2023We review the denial of an MJOA for legal error, including where the “challenge to the legal sufficiency of the state’s evidence depends upon the meaning of the statute defining the offense.” State v. Street, 317 Or App 1, 4 , 505 P3d 425 , rev den, 369 Or 705 (2022). | 4 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Newkirk
green
2 sentences2025State v. Newkirk, 319 Or App 131, 133 , 509 P3d 757 , rev den, 370 Or 214 (2022). 2025State v. Newkirk, 319 Or App 131, 133 , 509 P3d 757 , rev den, 370 Or 214 (2022). | 3 | 2023–2025 |
State v. Stevens
neutral
1 sentence2025State v. Stevens, 343 Or App 321, 322 , 577 P3d 1172 (2025). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Nagy
green
1 sentence2025Cite as 346 Or App 149 (2025) 153 As relevant to Count 6, ORS 163.205(1)(b)(A) pro- vides that a person commits first-degree criminal mistreat- ment if: “(b) The person, * * * having assumed the permanent or temporary care, custody or responsibility for the supervision of a dependent person or elderly person, intentionally or knowingly: “(A) Causes physical injury or injuries to the depen- dent person or elderly person[.]” (Emphasis added.) We review the denial of an MJOA for legal error, viewing the evidence, as well as reasonable inferences and credibility choices, in the light most favorabl | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. O'Hare
green
2 sentences2023Applying the “substantial step” standard articulated in State v. O’Hare, 309 Or App 357 , 481 P3d 953 (2021), we reverse the conviction for attempted escape in the third degree.1 We review the trial court’s denial of an MJOA for legal error, viewing all facts and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the state to determine whether there is sufficient evidence from which a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. 2023Applying the “substantial step” standard articulated in State v. O’Hare, 309 Or App 357 , 481 P3d 953 (2021), we reverse the conviction for attempted escape in the third degree.1 We review the trial court’s denial of an MJOA for legal error, viewing all facts and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the state to determine whether there is sufficient evidence from which a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Hedgpeth
green
2 sentences2023State v. Hedgpeth, 365 Or 724, 730 , 452 P3d 948 (2019). 2023State v. Hedgpeth, 365 Or 724, 730 , 452 P3d 948 (2019). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Townsend
green
1 sentence2022State v. Bordeaux, 220 Or App 165, 170 , 185 P3d 524 (2008). 1 ORS 165.800 provides, in relevant part: “(1) A person commits the crime of identity theft if the person, with the intent to deceive or to defraud, obtains, possesses, transfers, creates, utters or converts to the person’s own use the personal identification of another person. “* * * * * “(4) As used in this section: “(a) ‘Another person’ means an individual, whether living or deceased, an imaginary person * * *. “(b) ‘Personal identification’ includes * * * any written document or elec- tronic data that does, or purports to, provid | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Bordeaux
green
2 sentences2022State v. Bordeaux, 220 Or App 165, 170 , 185 P3d 524 (2008). 1 ORS 165.800 provides, in relevant part: “(1) A person commits the crime of identity theft if the person, with the intent to deceive or to defraud, obtains, possesses, transfers, creates, utters or converts to the person’s own use the personal identification of another person. “* * * * * “(4) As used in this section: “(a) ‘Another person’ means an individual, whether living or deceased, an imaginary person * * *. “(b) ‘Personal identification’ includes * * * any written document or elec- tronic data that does, or purports to, provid 2022State v. Bordeaux, 220 Or App 165, 170 , 185 P3d 524 (2008). 1 ORS 165.800 provides, in relevant part: “(1) A person commits the crime of identity theft if the person, with the intent to deceive or to defraud, obtains, possesses, transfers, creates, utters or converts to the person’s own use the personal identification of another person. “* * * * * “(4) As used in this section: “(a) ‘Another person’ means an individual, whether living or deceased, an imaginary person * * *. “(b) ‘Personal identification’ includes * * * any written document or elec- tronic data that does, or purports to, provid | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.