10 Oregon opinions name it 3 courts 1993–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Field v. Courseygreen2 sentences2023See Field v. Coursey, 264 Or App 724, 730-31 , 333 P3d 340 (2014) (finding arguments on appeal were not pre- served where they were qualitatively different than those made to the post-conviction court). 2023See Field v. Coursey, 264 Or App 724, 730-31 , 333 P3d 340 (2014) (finding arguments on appeal were not pre- served where they were qualitatively different than those made to the post-conviction court). | 1 | 1 |
Delgado-Juarez v. Caingreen1 sentence2020Nonetheless, the major- ity opinion goes on to posit several “other plausible reasons for an attorney exercising reasonable professional skill and judgment to opt against requesting a limiting instruction in a case such as petitioner’s.” 307 Or App at 95. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ramirezgreen1 sentence2010See Ramirez, 343 Or at 512 (discussing those considerations). 5 Defendant raises several other issues in his brief on the merits, some of which present constitutional challenges to aspects of Oregon’s sentencing guidelines. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Endsleygreen2 sentences2003In that respect, however, a motion to correct a judgment pursuant to ORS 138.083 is no different from a motion in the nature of coram nobis, which the court held in State v. Endsley, 214 Or 537, 541-42 , 331 P2d 338 (1958), is not a special statutory proceeding. 5 Both motions arise after judgment and seek to correct a perceived error in the earlier criminal judgment. 2003In that respect, however, a motion to correct a judgment pursuant to ORS 138.083 is no different from a motion in the nature of coram nobis, which the court held in State v. Endsley, 214 Or 537, 541-42 , 331 P2d 338 (1958), is not a special statutory proceeding. 5 Both motions arise after judgment and seek to correct a perceived error in the earlier criminal judgment. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Moore v. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurancegreen1 sentence2001See Moore, 317 Or at 241 (in context of fire insurance policies, common-law rule that written contract may be orally modified did not apply because superseded by statute). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Long
green
2 sentences2025Id. 2017The court could then hear the parties’ arguments on the issue and thereafter make a finding— which is what the constitutional provision actually contemplates—as to what had occurred, in order to alleviate any doubt.” Long, 320 Or at 370 n 14 (citing State v. Woodson, 315 Or 314, 316-17 , 845 P2d 203 (1993)). | 2 | 2017–2025 |
Bachman v. Bachman
green
2 sentences2023B. v. Bachman, 171 Or App 665, 673 , 16 P.3d 1185 (2000), rev den, 332 Or 305 774 Mouktabis v. Clackamas County Assessor (2001) (internal quotation marks omitted). 2023B. v. Bachman, 171 Or App 665, 673 , 16 P.3d 1185 (2000), rev den, 332 Or 305 774 Mouktabis v. Clackamas County Assessor (2001) (internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Woodson
green
2 sentences2017The court could then hear the parties’ arguments on the issue and thereafter make a finding— which is what the constitutional provision actually contemplates—as to what had occurred, in order to alleviate any doubt.” Long, 320 Or at 370 n 14 (citing State v. Woodson, 315 Or 314, 316-17 , 845 P2d 203 (1993)). 2017The court could then hear the parties’ arguments on the issue and thereafter make a finding— which is what the constitutional provision actually contemplates—as to what had occurred, in order to alleviate any doubt.” Long, 320 Or at 370 n 14 (citing State v. Woodson, 315 Or 314, 316-17 , 845 P2d 203 (1993)). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Wynne v. Department of Revenue
neutral
1 sentence2012The assessor attempted to appeal the Board of Equalization‟s decision to the Department and the court simply noted that “[i]t would thwart clear legislative intent * * * if the assessor could correct a perceived error in his judgment by appealing that higher value3 to the Department of Revenue.” Id. at 379-380 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.
green
1 sentence1993The dispositive issue before this court is whether the Court of Appeals properly *520 considered whether it should reach the perceived error.” 312 Or at 380 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.