Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 2020–2025 9 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Daly
green
2 sentences2025Daly, 308 Or App at 79 . 2025Daly, 308 Or App at 79 . | 2 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Kinstler
green
2 sentences2025To assess defendant’s argument on appeal, our inquiry is “whether the testimony and evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to defendant, is legally sufficient to support a finding that at least one witness testified falsely and, if so, whether that false testimony concerned a material issue.” State v. Kinstler, 307 Or App 517, 521 , 478 P3d 595 (2020). 2025To assess defendant’s argument on appeal, our inquiry is “whether the testimony and evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to defendant, is legally sufficient to support a finding that at least one witness testified falsely and, if so, whether that false testimony concerned a material issue.” State v. Kinstler, 307 Or App 517, 521 , 478 P3d 595 (2020). | 2 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Davis
green
2 sentences2024In the seventh, defen- dant argues that the trial court erred when it overruled his objection to a statement that the prosecutor made in clos- ing arguments that he contends constituted burden shifting, and, finally, in the eighth assignment, defendant argues that the court plainly erred by permitting the prosecutor to make other statements in closing arguments that he contends mis- stated the jury’s function and the burden of proof.1 In light of our disposition on the sixth assignment of error, and the Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Davis, 372 Or 618 , ___ P3d ___ (2024), we do n 2024In the seventh, defen- dant argues that the trial court erred when it overruled his objection to a statement that the prosecutor made in clos- ing arguments that he contends constituted burden shifting, and, finally, in the eighth assignment, defendant argues that the court plainly erred by permitting the prosecutor to make other statements in closing arguments that he contends mis- stated the jury’s function and the burden of proof.1 In light of our disposition on the sixth assignment of error, and the Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Davis, 372 Or 618 , ___ P3d ___ (2024), we do n | 2 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Payne
green
2 sentences2023In addition, because the evidence at trial did not support an inference that the witness “consciously tes- tified falsely,” as required under State v. Payne, 366 Or 588, 607 , 468 P3d 445 (2020), the trial court did not err in declining to give the witness-false-in-part jury instruction. 2023In addition, because the evidence at trial did not support an inference that the witness “consciously tes- tified falsely,” as required under State v. Payne, 366 Or 588, 607 , 468 P3d 445 (2020), the trial court did not err in declining to give the witness-false-in-part jury instruction. | 2 | 2020–2023 |
State v. Chemxananou
green
1 sentence2022Multnomah County Circuit Court 19CR20299; A173966 510 P3d 954 Defendant appeals his conviction for four counts of criminal mistreatment in the first degree, ORS 163.205, challenging the court’s refusal to give a witness- false-in-part jury instruction and asserting that the court plainly erred by omitting a culpable mental state with respect to the element of causing physical injury. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Camirand
green
1 sentence2021Id. at 11-13 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.