Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Pennsylvania opinions name it 5 courts 1933–1997 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Deppellergreen2 sentences1997See also Commonwealth v. Sanders, 339 Pa.Super. 373, 382-84 , 489 A.2d 207, 212 (1985), Commonwealth v. Deppeller, 314 Pa.Super. 368, 373-74 , 460 A.2d 1184, 1187 (1983)). *185 While this court in Commonwealth v. McDonald, 399 Pa.Super. 250 , 582 A.2d 328 (1990), held that a “reviewing court may presume that the certification judge considered the evidence presented” in reaching his conclusion to certify the juvenile as an adult, and is thus “not required to make a formalized, conventional adjudication of findings of fact,” Id. at 256-58 , 582 A.2d at 331 , the facts in McDonald, supra, clearly 1997See also Commonwealth v. Sanders, 339 Pa.Super. 373, 382-84 , 489 A.2d 207, 212 (1985), Commonwealth v. Deppeller, 314 Pa.Super. 368, 373-74 , 460 A.2d 1184, 1187 (1983)). *185 While this court in Commonwealth v. McDonald, 399 Pa.Super. 250 , 582 A.2d 328 (1990), held that a “reviewing court may presume that the certification judge considered the evidence presented” in reaching his conclusion to certify the juvenile as an adult, and is thus “not required to make a formalized, conventional adjudication of findings of fact,” Id. at 256-58 , 582 A.2d at 331 , the facts in McDonald, supra, clearly | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Sandersgreen2 sentences1997See also Commonwealth v. Sanders, 339 Pa.Super. 373, 382-84 , 489 A.2d 207, 212 (1985), Commonwealth v. Deppeller, 314 Pa.Super. 368, 373-74 , 460 A.2d 1184, 1187 (1983)). *185 While this court in Commonwealth v. McDonald, 399 Pa.Super. 250 , 582 A.2d 328 (1990), held that a “reviewing court may presume that the certification judge considered the evidence presented” in reaching his conclusion to certify the juvenile as an adult, and is thus “not required to make a formalized, conventional adjudication of findings of fact,” Id. at 256-58 , 582 A.2d at 331 , the facts in McDonald, supra, clearly 1997See also Commonwealth v. Sanders, 339 Pa.Super. 373, 382-84 , 489 A.2d 207, 212 (1985), Commonwealth v. Deppeller, 314 Pa.Super. 368, 373-74 , 460 A.2d 1184, 1187 (1983)). *185 While this court in Commonwealth v. McDonald, 399 Pa.Super. 250 , 582 A.2d 328 (1990), held that a “reviewing court may presume that the certification judge considered the evidence presented” in reaching his conclusion to certify the juvenile as an adult, and is thus “not required to make a formalized, conventional adjudication of findings of fact,” Id. at 256-58 , 582 A.2d at 331 , the facts in McDonald, supra, clearly | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. McDonaldgreen2 sentences1997See also Commonwealth v. Sanders, 339 Pa.Super. 373, 382-84 , 489 A.2d 207, 212 (1985), Commonwealth v. Deppeller, 314 Pa.Super. 368, 373-74 , 460 A.2d 1184, 1187 (1983)). *185 While this court in Commonwealth v. McDonald, 399 Pa.Super. 250 , 582 A.2d 328 (1990), held that a “reviewing court may presume that the certification judge considered the evidence presented” in reaching his conclusion to certify the juvenile as an adult, and is thus “not required to make a formalized, conventional adjudication of findings of fact,” Id. at 256-58 , 582 A.2d at 331 , the facts in McDonald, supra, clearly 1997See also Commonwealth v. Sanders, 339 Pa.Super. 373, 382-84 , 489 A.2d 207, 212 (1985), Commonwealth v. Deppeller, 314 Pa.Super. 368, 373-74 , 460 A.2d 1184, 1187 (1983)). *185 While this court in Commonwealth v. McDonald, 399 Pa.Super. 250 , 582 A.2d 328 (1990), held that a “reviewing court may presume that the certification judge considered the evidence presented” in reaching his conclusion to certify the juvenile as an adult, and is thus “not required to make a formalized, conventional adjudication of findings of fact,” Id. at 256-58 , 582 A.2d at 331 , the facts in McDonald, supra, clearly | 1 | 1 |
Trestrail v. Johnsongreen1 sentence1940What was said in this regard in Trestrail v. Johnson, supra, 395, was not an ill-considered dictum, but was the enunciation of a principle which is firmly embedded in our law. | 1 | 1 |
Kramph's Estategreen1 sentence1939Illustrations in our own state are: Avery v. Home for Orphans of Odd Fellows of Pennsylvania, 228 Pa. 58 ; Kramph’s Estate, 228 Pa. 455, 461-463; Mears’s Estate, 299 Pa. 217 ; Curran’s Estate, 310 Pa. 434 , *134 In the present case the Orphans’ Court, after considering the provisions of the will and weighing the oral evidence in regard to the expressed sentiments of testatrix, her church affiliations, her family pride, and her attachment to the old homestead, found as a fact that her paramount purpose was to build and endow a Wilkey Memorial Presbyterian Church. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Philadelphia v. Heirs of Girard
green
2 sentences1974Perhaps the best enunciation of the doctrine is that contained in Restatement, Trusts, section 399: £If property is given in trust to be applied to a particular charitable purpose, and it is or becomes impossible or impracticable or illegal to carry out the particular purpose, and if the settler manifested a more general intention to devote the property to charitable purposes, the trust will not fail but the court will direct the application of the property to some charitable purpose which falls within the general charitable intention of the settler.’ Or, as tersely stated in City of Philadelp 1941Perhaps the best enunciation of the doctrine is that contained in Restatement, Trusts, Section 399: ‘If property is given in trust to be applied to a particular charitable purpose, and it is or becomes impossible or impracticable or illegal to carry out the particular purpose, and if the settlor manifested a more general intention to devote the property to charitable purposes, the trust will not fail but the court will direct the application of the property to some charitable purpose which falls within the general charitable intention of the settlor.’ Or, as tersely stated in City of Philadelp | 3 | 1939–1974 |
Commonwealth v. Riggins
green
2 sentences1981The sentence was imposed on April 21, 1976, prior to the enunciation of that requirement: Com. v. Riggins, 474 Pa. 115 , 377 A. 2d 140 (1977). 1981The sentence was imposed on April 21, 1976, prior to the enunciation of that requirement: Com. v. Riggins, 474 Pa. 115 , 377 A. 2d 140 (1977). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Lyman Estate
green
2 sentences1967See: Hays Estate, 358 Pa. 38 , 55 A. 2d 763 (1947) and Lyman Estate, 366 Pa. 164 , 76 A. 2d 633 (1950). 1967See: Hays Estate, 358 Pa. 38 , 55 A. 2d 763 (1947) and Lyman Estate, 366 Pa. 164 , 76 A. 2d 633 (1950). | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Hays Estate
green
2 sentences1967See: Hays Estate, 358 Pa. 38 , 55 A. 2d 763 (1947) and Lyman Estate, 366 Pa. 164 , 76 A. 2d 633 (1950). 1967See: Hays Estate, 358 Pa. 38 , 55 A. 2d 763 (1947) and Lyman Estate, 366 Pa. 164 , 76 A. 2d 633 (1950). | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Commonwealth v. Comber
green
2 sentences1966Such verdict was consonant with our law: Commonwealth v. Comber, 374 Pa. 570, 573 , 97 A. 2d 343 . 1966Such verdict was consonant with our law: Commonwealth v. Comber, 374 Pa. 570, 573 , 97 A. 2d 343 . | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Western Live Stock v. Bureau of Revenue
green
1 sentence1955The question has been raised whether the so-called multiple burden test discussed in Western Live Stock v. Bureau of Revenue, 303 U. S. 250 , has been discarded *546 or modified by decisions of the United States Supreme Court since the original enunciation of that principle. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Potter County v. Page
green
1 sentence1940To mention but a few illustrations: Despite the existence of the same personal accountability, the interest paid by the bank on a fund thus deposited has been held not to belong to the officer, but to the beneficiary: County of Lackawanna v. Duffy, 248 Pa. 575 ; Potter County v. Page, 53 Pa. Superior Ct. 268 . | 1 | 1940–1940 |
County of Lackawanna v. Duffy
neutral
1 sentence1940To mention but a few illustrations: Despite the existence of the same personal accountability, the interest paid by the bank on a fund thus deposited has been held not to belong to the officer, but to the beneficiary: County of Lackawanna v. Duffy, 248 Pa. 575 ; Potter County v. Page, 53 Pa. Superior Ct. 268 . | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Avery v. Home for Orphans of Odd Fellows
neutral
1 sentence1939Illustrations in our own state are: Avery v. Home for Orphans of Odd Fellows of Pennsylvania, 228 Pa. 58 ; Kramph’s Estate, 228 Pa. 455, 461-463; Mears’s Estate, 299 Pa. 217 ; Curran’s Estate, 310 Pa. 434 , *134 In the present case the Orphans’ Court, after considering the provisions of the will and weighing the oral evidence in regard to the expressed sentiments of testatrix, her church affiliations, her family pride, and her attachment to the old homestead, found as a fact that her paramount purpose was to build and endow a Wilkey Memorial Presbyterian Church. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Curran's Estate
green
1 sentence1939Illustrations in our own state are: Avery v. Home for Orphans of Odd Fellows of Pennsylvania, 228 Pa. 58 ; Kramph’s Estate, 228 Pa. 455, 461-463; Mears’s Estate, 299 Pa. 217 ; Curran’s Estate, 310 Pa. 434 , *134 In the present case the Orphans’ Court, after considering the provisions of the will and weighing the oral evidence in regard to the expressed sentiments of testatrix, her church affiliations, her family pride, and her attachment to the old homestead, found as a fact that her paramount purpose was to build and endow a Wilkey Memorial Presbyterian Church. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Mears's Estate
neutral
1 sentence1939Illustrations in our own state are: Avery v. Home for Orphans of Odd Fellows of Pennsylvania, 228 Pa. 58 ; Kramph’s Estate, 228 Pa. 455, 461-463; Mears’s Estate, 299 Pa. 217 ; Curran’s Estate, 310 Pa. 434 , *134 In the present case the Orphans’ Court, after considering the provisions of the will and weighing the oral evidence in regard to the expressed sentiments of testatrix, her church affiliations, her family pride, and her attachment to the old homestead, found as a fact that her paramount purpose was to build and endow a Wilkey Memorial Presbyterian Church. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Maul v. Rider
green
1 sentence1933Recording is constructive notice only to those who are bound to search for it: subsequent purchasers and mortgagees, and, perhaps, all others who deal with or on the credit of the title, in the line of which the recorded deed [or mortgage] belongs: Maul v. Rider, 59 Pa. 167, 171 ; Bank v. Carr, 15 Pa. Superior Ct. 346, 349 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Bank v. Carr
neutral
1 sentence1933Recording is constructive notice only to those who are bound to search for it: subsequent purchasers and mortgagees, and, perhaps, all others who deal with or on the credit of the title, in the line of which the recorded deed [or mortgage] belongs: Maul v. Rider, 59 Pa. 167, 171 ; Bank v. Carr, 15 Pa. Superior Ct. 346, 349 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.