executor claim in Pennsylvania

2023The Executor’s objection, therefore, just as recognized in Wyinegar, supra, and Lutz, supra, in essence also advances the premise that private legatees should benefit at public expense. . . .. **** In the matter before the court, there is no question that counsel for the incapacitated surviving spouse was pursuing the surviving spouse’s rights diligently both before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. [Attorney McKenna] was in continuous communication with the Estate over the available assets, the need to transfer funds from the supplemental needs trust to a special needs trust, the need to obta

2023Accordingly, we affirm the orphans’ court’s denial of Appellants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings on the grounds that genuine issues of material fact are in dispute,22 we vacate its denial of Appellants’ petition for declaratory judgment as premature, and we remand this matter for the completion of any outstanding discovery and the scheduling of an evidentiary hearing.23 ____________________________________________ 22 See Grabowski, supra; In re Estate of Rood, supra. 23 In the event the orphans’ court determines that Walter was not subjected to undue influence, it must then consider whet

2023Accordingly, we affirm the orphans’ court’s denial of Appellants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings on the grounds that genuine issues of material fact are in dispute,22 we vacate its denial of Appellants’ petition for declaratory judgment as premature, and we remand this matter for the completion of any outstanding discovery and the scheduling of an evidentiary hearing.23 ____________________________________________ 22 See Grabowski, supra; In re Estate of Rood, supra. 23 In the event the orphans’ court determines that Walter was not subjected to undue influence, it must then consider whet

2023Accordingly, we affirm the orphans’ court’s denial of Appellants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings on the grounds that genuine issues of material fact are in dispute,22 we vacate its denial of Appellants’ petition for declaratory judgment as premature, and we remand this matter for the completion of any outstanding discovery and the scheduling of an evidentiary hearing.23 ____________________________________________ 22 See Grabowski, supra; In re Estate of Rood, supra. 23 In the event the orphans’ court determines that Walter was not subjected to undue influence, it must then consider whet

2023Accordingly, we affirm the orphans’ court’s denial of Appellants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings on the grounds that genuine issues of material fact are in dispute,22 we vacate its denial of Appellants’ petition for declaratory judgment as premature, and we remand this matter for the completion of any outstanding discovery and the scheduling of an evidentiary hearing.23 ____________________________________________ 22 See Grabowski, supra; In re Estate of Rood, supra. 23 In the event the orphans’ court determines that Walter was not subjected to undue influence, it must then consider whet

2022He maintains that the holdings of these cases are wrong because neither discussed § 1991 of the Statutory Construction Act or this Court’s decision Ambrosia v. Yerage, 572 A.2d 777 (Pa.Super. 1990).

2022He maintains that the holdings of these cases are wrong because neither discussed § 1991 of the Statutory Construction Act or this Court’s decision Ambrosia v. Yerage, 572 A.2d 777 (Pa.Super. 1990).

1974An executor can claim as a creditor for services rendered or claims owed to the executor-creditor incurred prior to the death of decedent: Davidson’s Est., 334 Pa. 389 , 6 A.2d 73 (1939); Perri v. Chiavaroli, 370 Pa. 495 , 88 A.2d 798 (1952).

1974An executor can claim as a creditor for services rendered or claims owed to the executor-creditor incurred prior to the death of decedent: Davidson’s Est., 334 Pa. 389 , 6 A.2d 73 (1939); Perri v. Chiavaroli, 370 Pa. 495 , 88 A.2d 798 (1952).

1974An executor can claim as a creditor for services rendered or claims owed to the executor-creditor incurred prior to the death of decedent: Davidson’s Est., 334 Pa. 389 , 6 A.2d 73 (1939); Perri v. Chiavaroli, 370 Pa. 495 , 88 A.2d 798 (1952).

1974An executor can claim as a creditor for services rendered or claims owed to the executor-creditor incurred prior to the death of decedent: Davidson’s Est., 334 Pa. 389 , 6 A.2d 73 (1939); Perri v. Chiavaroli, 370 Pa. 495 , 88 A.2d 798 (1952).

1959As to claims against decedents dying before that date, the law is as expressed in Keyser’s Appeal, 124 Pa. 80 , in which case, after stating that the statute of limitations may be set up in the orphans’ court precisely as in a court of law, the court said, on page 92: “Nor can the statute be tolled by anything short of a suit at law or what is its equivalent in the Orphans’ Court.

1955Chappell’s Estate, 264 Pa. 486 , decided that a widow had the right to rely on an executor to claim her exemption and allowance and his unfortunate absence in the armed services prevented his performing his duties.

1940A stakeholder, ordered to pay out of funds held by him, is not aggrieved by a distribution which he considers objectionable but which is satisfactory to the distributees: Craig’s Appeal, 38 Pa. 330 ; Crawford v. Shriver, 139 Pa. 239 , 21 A. 518 .

1940A stakeholder, ordered to pay out of funds held by him, is not aggrieved by a distribution which he considers objectionable but which is satisfactory to the distributees: Craig’s Appeal, 38 Pa. 330 ; Crawford v. Shriver, 139 Pa. 239 , 21 A. 518 .

1940A stakeholder, ordered to pay out of funds held by him, is not aggrieved by a distribution which he considers objectionable but which is satisfactory to the distributees: Craig’s Appeal, 38 Pa. 330 ; Crawford v. Shriver, 139 Pa. 239 , 21 A. 518 .

1940An executor may not challenge distribution to legatees merely because he thinks the court erred in ordering it when, in fact, the distributees do not object: Hand’s Estate, 288 Pa. 569 , 136 A. 864 ; Reese’s Estate, 317 Pa. 473 , 177 A. 792 .

1940An executor may not challenge distribution to legatees merely because he thinks the court erred in ordering it when, in fact, the distributees do not object: Hand’s Estate, 288 Pa. 569 , 136 A. 864 ; Reese’s Estate, 317 Pa. 473 , 177 A. 792 .

1940An executor may not challenge distribution to legatees merely because he thinks the court erred in ordering it when, in fact, the distributees do not object: Hand’s Estate, 288 Pa. 569 , 136 A. 864 ; Reese’s Estate, 317 Pa. 473 , 177 A. 792 .

1940An executor may not challenge distribution to legatees merely because he thinks the court erred in ordering it when, in fact, the distributees do not object: Hand’s Estate, 288 Pa. 569 , 136 A. 864 ; Reese’s Estate, 317 Pa. 473 , 177 A. 792 .

1936Of course, the executor has a claim against the bank for reimbursement for the taxes he has been compelled to pay: Pennsylvania Co., etc., Trustee, v. Bergson, 307 Pa. 44 (1932).