10 Pennsylvania opinions name it 4 courts 1969–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. DiClaudiogreen2 sentences2021On August 16, 2021, this Court entered an order informing the parties that the issue raised in the rule to show cause would be referred to the panel assigned to decide the merits of this appeal. “[T]he prisoner mailbox rule provides that a pro se prisoner’s document is deemed filed on the date he delivers it to prison authorities for mailing.” Commonwealth v. DiClaudio, 210 A.3d 1070 , 1074 (Pa. Super. 2019). 2021On August 16, 2021, this Court entered an order informing the parties that the issue raised in the rule to show cause would be referred to the panel assigned to decide the merits of this appeal. “[T]he prisoner mailbox rule provides that a pro se prisoner’s document is deemed filed on the date he delivers it to prison authorities for mailing.” Commonwealth v. DiClaudio, 210 A.3d 1070, 1074 (Pa. Super. 2019). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Capaldigreen1 sentence2019In his brief, Appellant presents two questions for our review; however, we must first address the apparent untimeliness of his notice of appeal, as we “lack jurisdiction to consider untimely appeals, and we may raise such jurisdictional issues sua sponte.” Commonwealth v. Capaldi, 112 A.3d 1242, 1244 (Pa. Super. 2015). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Fordgreen2 sentences2003Commonwealth v. Wallace, 555 Pa. 397 , 724 A.2d 916, 920-21 (1999) (refusing to apply relaxed waiver rule to capital case and concluding Court has no power to review claim that could have been raised on direct appeal under express terms of PCRA waiver provisions). ¶ 14 A "petitioner can avoid a finding of waiver under the PCRA by making a proper claim of ineffective assistance of counsel at his first available opportunity to do so." See Commonwealth v. Ford, 570 Pa. 378 , 809 A.2d 325, 344, n. 5 (2002) (indicating PCRA petitioner could overcome PCRA waiver rule by pleading and proving ineffect 2003Commonwealth v. Wallace, 555 Pa. 397 , 724 A.2d 916, 920-21 (1999) (refusing to apply relaxed waiver rule to capital case and concluding Court has no power to review claim that could have been raised on direct appeal under express terms of PCRA waiver provisions). ¶ 14 A "petitioner can avoid a finding of waiver under the PCRA by making a proper claim of ineffective assistance of counsel at his first available opportunity to do so." See Commonwealth v. Ford, 570 Pa. 378 , 809 A.2d 325, 344, n. 5 (2002) (indicating PCRA petitioner could overcome PCRA waiver rule by pleading and proving ineffect | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Wallacegreen2 sentences2003Commonwealth v. Wallace, 555 Pa. 397 , 724 A.2d 916, 920-21 (1999) (refusing to apply relaxed waiver rule to capital case and concluding Court has no power to review claim that could have been raised on direct appeal under express terms of PCRA waiver provisions). ¶ 14 A "petitioner can avoid a finding of waiver under the PCRA by making a proper claim of ineffective assistance of counsel at his first available opportunity to do so." See Commonwealth v. Ford, 570 Pa. 378 , 809 A.2d 325, 344, n. 5 (2002) (indicating PCRA petitioner could overcome PCRA waiver rule by pleading and proving ineffect 2003Commonwealth v. Wallace, 555 Pa. 397 , 724 A.2d 916, 920-21 (1999) (refusing to apply relaxed waiver rule to capital case and concluding Court has no power to review claim that could have been raised on direct appeal under express terms of PCRA waiver provisions). ¶ 14 A "petitioner can avoid a finding of waiver under the PCRA by making a proper claim of ineffective assistance of counsel at his first available opportunity to do so." See Commonwealth v. Ford, 570 Pa. 378 , 809 A.2d 325, 344, n. 5 (2002) (indicating PCRA petitioner could overcome PCRA waiver rule by pleading and proving ineffect | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Vaccone v. Syken
green
2 sentences2015Attorney Maher, through Father, contends that this Court’s decision in Vertical Resources, Inc., v. Bramlett, 887 A.2d. 1193 (Pa.Super.2003) and our Supreme Court’s decision in Vaccone v. Syken, 587 Pa. 380 , 899 A.2d 1103 (2006), support his claim that precluded counsel may continue to advocate on appeal. 2015Attorney Maher, through Father, contends that this Court’s decision in Vertical Resources, Inc., v. Bramlett, 887 A.2d. 1193 (Pa.Super.2003) and our Supreme Court’s decision in Vaccone v. Syken, 587 Pa. 380 , 899 A.2d 1103 (2006), support his claim that precluded counsel may continue to advocate on appeal. | 3 | 2015–2015 |
Vertical Resources, Inc. v. Bramlett
green
1 sentence2015Attorney Maher, through Father, contends that this Court’s decision in Vertical Resources Inc., v. Bramblett, 837 A.2d 1193 (Pa. Super. 2003) and our Supreme Court’s decision in Vaccone v. Syken, 899 A.2d 1103 (Pa. 2006), support his claim that precluded counsel may continue to advocate on appeal. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Com. v. Young
neutral
1 sentence2007See, generally: Commonwealth v. Young, 903 A.2d 56 , 1379 EDA 2005, unpublished memorandum at pp. 12-14 (Pa.Super. filed May 16, 2005). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
McRoberts Estate
neutral
2 sentences1987The Superior Court held in In re McRoberts Estate that where there was no appeal from an order dismissing an exception, the issue raised by the exception was conclusively adjudicated: 158 Pa.Super. 89 , 43 A.2d 910 (1945). 1987The Superior Court held in In re McRoberts Estate that where there was no appeal from an order dismissing an exception, the issue raised by the exception was conclusively adjudicated: 158 Pa.Super. 89 , 43 A.2d 910 (1945). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Moidel v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.
green
2 sentences1983Unlike Boudwin v. Yellow Cab Co., 410 Pa. 31 , 188 A.2d 259 (1963), Lobalzo v. Varoli, 409 Pa. 15 , 185 A.2d 557 (1962), and Moidel v. Peoples Natural Gas Company, 397 Pa. 212 , 154 A.2d 399 (1959), the three cases cited by appellants in their brief to support their argument that evidence of insurance coverage is inadmissible, the cause of action between the parties did not arise out of a bailment or some other contractual relationship. 1983Unlike Boudwin v. Yellow Cab Co., 410 Pa. 31 , 188 A.2d 259 (1963), Lobalzo v. Varoli, 409 Pa. 15 , 185 A.2d 557 (1962), and Moidel v. Peoples Natural Gas Company, 397 Pa. 212 , 154 A.2d 399 (1959), the three cases cited by appellants in their brief to support their argument that evidence of insurance coverage is inadmissible, the cause of action between the parties did not arise out of a bailment or some other contractual relationship. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Boudwin v. Yellow Cab Co.
green
2 sentences1983Unlike Boudwin v. Yellow Cab Co., 410 Pa. 31 , 188 A.2d 259 (1963), Lobalzo v. Varoli, 409 Pa. 15 , 185 A.2d 557 (1962), and Moidel v. Peoples Natural Gas Company, 397 Pa. 212 , 154 A.2d 399 (1959), the three cases cited by appellants in their brief to support their argument that evidence of insurance coverage is inadmissible, the cause of action between the parties did not arise out of a bailment or some other contractual relationship. 1983Unlike Boudwin v. Yellow Cab Co., 410 Pa. 31 , 188 A.2d 259 (1963), Lobalzo v. Varoli, 409 Pa. 15 , 185 A.2d 557 (1962), and Moidel v. Peoples Natural Gas Company, 397 Pa. 212 , 154 A.2d 399 (1959), the three cases cited by appellants in their brief to support their argument that evidence of insurance coverage is inadmissible, the cause of action between the parties did not arise out of a bailment or some other contractual relationship. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Lobalzo v. Varoli
green
2 sentences1983Unlike Boudwin v. Yellow Cab Co., 410 Pa. 31 , 188 A.2d 259 (1963), Lobalzo v. Varoli, 409 Pa. 15 , 185 A.2d 557 (1962), and Moidel v. Peoples Natural Gas Company, 397 Pa. 212 , 154 A.2d 399 (1959), the three cases cited by appellants in their brief to support their argument that evidence of insurance coverage is inadmissible, the cause of action between the parties did not arise out of a bailment or some other contractual relationship. 1983Unlike Boudwin v. Yellow Cab Co., 410 Pa. 31 , 188 A.2d 259 (1963), Lobalzo v. Varoli, 409 Pa. 15 , 185 A.2d 557 (1962), and Moidel v. Peoples Natural Gas Company, 397 Pa. 212 , 154 A.2d 399 (1959), the three cases cited by appellants in their brief to support their argument that evidence of insurance coverage is inadmissible, the cause of action between the parties did not arise out of a bailment or some other contractual relationship. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Commonwealth v. Davidson
neutral
1 sentence1969The issue raised in exception no. 5 has already been decided adversely to defendant in Commonwealth v. Ressler, supra, where we held, on the authority of Commonwealth v. Davidson, 412 Pa. 279 (1963), that the transcript need not affirmatively show that the magistrate is the nearest available one where, as here, the transcript shows that defendant was brought before a justice of the peace in the same township as the situs of the offense. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.