7 New York opinions name it 2 courts 1913–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Andersongreen1 sentence2020Further, the prosecutor's comments during summation "were either a fair response to defense counsel's summation or fair comment on the evidence" ( People v Anderson , 52 AD3d 1320, 1321 [4th Dept 2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 733 [2008]). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Denisongreen1 sentence2020The prosecutor's questions during cross-examination and direct examination were permissible inasmuch as they related to an issue raised by defense counsel on direct examination ( see People v Denison , 300 AD2d 1060, 1061 [4th Dept 2002]) and to the "competency or credibility or the validity of [the expert witness's] diagnosis or opinion" (CPL 60.55 [1]). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Cainesgreen1 sentence2003As a result, not only is defendant’s argument belied by the record, but the issue raised does not challenge the legality of the sentence and is, therefore, precluded by his waiver (see People v Caines, 268 AD2d 790, 791 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 833 [2000]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Yadid, LLC v. Gcw Bell Corp.
green
1 sentence2020Further, the prosecutor's comments during summation "were either a fair response to defense counsel's summation or fair comment on the evidence" ( People v Anderson , 52 AD3d 1320, 1321 [4th Dept 2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 733 [2008]). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Fewell
green
1 sentence2003As defendant was adequately advised concerning the maximum sentence that could be imposed, we decline to review his claim that his sentence was harsh and excessive (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733 [1998]; People v Fewell [Sawyer], 284 AD2d 563 [2001], lvs denied 97 NY2d 681 , 687 [2001]). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
People v. Hidalgo
green
1 sentence2003As defendant was adequately advised concerning the maximum sentence that could be imposed, we decline to review his claim that his sentence was harsh and excessive (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733 [1998]; People v Fewell [Sawyer], 284 AD2d 563 [2001], lvs denied 97 NY2d 681 , 687 [2001]). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Goldstein v. Kelleher
green
1 sentence1991In any event, and particularly in light of the fact that the People have given no indication that any of the three detectives involved were unavailable or that to produce any one of them would somehow jeopardize an investigation, the issue raised at the hearing regarding the propriety of the police conduct was sufficiently substantial to require the appearance of one of those detectives (see, People v Petralia, 62 NY2d 47, 52 , cert denied 469 US 852 ). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
People v. Petralia
green
1 sentence1991In any event, and particularly in light of the fact that the People have given no indication that any of the three detectives involved were unavailable or that to produce any one of them would somehow jeopardize an investigation, the issue raised at the hearing regarding the propriety of the police conduct was sufficiently substantial to require the appearance of one of those detectives (see, People v Petralia, 62 NY2d 47, 52 , cert denied 469 US 852 ). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Yager v. Rubymar Corp.
green
1 sentence1962If the defendant had been able to establish such to be the fact upon the trial, he would have been entitled to have the market value of the premises in question credited upon the indebtedness (New Jersey Stat. Ann., § 2A:50-22; Yager v. Rubymar Corp., 34 Misc 2d 704, 711 ). | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Woolley v. . Stewart
green
1 sentence1958(Woolley v. Stewart, 222 N. Y. 347, 352-353 ; Rosenzweig v. Salkind, 5 A D 2d 58, 60-61; Linden Trans-Mix Corp. v. Griffin, 5 Misc 2d 188 .) It may be that after trial of the issue raised by this defense the court will find that defendant’s acts were not so referable; but this court cannot at this time strike the pleading as sham and frivolous. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Linden Trans-Mix Corp. v. Griffin
neutral
1 sentence1958(Woolley v. Stewart, 222 N. Y. 347, 352-353 ; Rosenzweig v. Salkind, 5 A D 2d 58, 60-61; Linden Trans-Mix Corp. v. Griffin, 5 Misc 2d 188 .) It may be that after trial of the issue raised by this defense the court will find that defendant’s acts were not so referable; but this court cannot at this time strike the pleading as sham and frivolous. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Adams v. . Massey
green
1 sentence1955(Adams v. Massey, 184 N. Y. 62, 70 ; Overheiser v. Lackey, 207 N. Y. 229, 233 ; Matter of MacDowell, 217 N. Y. 454 ; Matter of Durbrow, 245 N. Y. 469 ; Matter of Watson, 262 N. Y. 284 ; Matter of Catlin, 97 Misc. 223, 227 .) Words may not be capriciously rejected as meaningless but interpreted according to the perspective and context in which they are found (Matter of Pepper, 307 N. Y. 242, 251 ), and especially cogent on the issue raised is the rule that where a general benevolent purpose is manifested by a testator, the terms of the will shall be liberally construed to the end that his purpo | 1 | 1955–1955 |
In Re the Accounting of the United States Trust Co.
green
1 sentence1955(Adams v. Massey, 184 N. Y. 62, 70 ; Overheiser v. Lackey, 207 N. Y. 229, 233 ; Matter of MacDowell, 217 N. Y. 454 ; Matter of Durbrow, 245 N. Y. 469 ; Matter of Watson, 262 N. Y. 284 ; Matter of Catlin, 97 Misc. 223, 227 .) Words may not be capriciously rejected as meaningless but interpreted according to the perspective and context in which they are found (Matter of Pepper, 307 N. Y. 242, 251 ), and especially cogent on the issue raised is the rule that where a general benevolent purpose is manifested by a testator, the terms of the will shall be liberally construed to the end that his purpo | 1 | 1955–1955 |
In Re the Will of Neher
green
1 sentence1955(Matter of Neher, 279 N. Y. 370, 373-374 ; Matter of Potter, 307 N. Y. 504, 517 ; Matter of Pattberg, 282 App. Div. 770 , affd. 306 N. Y. 835 ; Matter of Robinson, 203 N. Y. 380, 388 .) Although it may approach the realm of speculation to infer that the testator envisioned the possible future separation of the Medical College from Syracuse University, nevertheless, the right to withhold income, indubitably reserved to the trustees of Syracuse University, signifies the delegation of a degree of control by which the testamentary purpose could be effectuated upon the happening of such a contingen | 1 | 1955–1955 |
In Re the Probate of the Will of MacDowell
green
1 sentence1955(Adams v. Massey, 184 N. Y. 62, 70 ; Overheiser v. Lackey, 207 N. Y. 229, 233 ; Matter of MacDowell, 217 N. Y. 454 ; Matter of Durbrow, 245 N. Y. 469 ; Matter of Watson, 262 N. Y. 284 ; Matter of Catlin, 97 Misc. 223, 227 .) Words may not be capriciously rejected as meaningless but interpreted according to the perspective and context in which they are found (Matter of Pepper, 307 N. Y. 242, 251 ), and especially cogent on the issue raised is the rule that where a general benevolent purpose is manifested by a testator, the terms of the will shall be liberally construed to the end that his purpo | 1 | 1955–1955 |
In Re the Accounting of Clayton
green
1 sentence1955(Adams v. Massey, 184 N. Y. 62, 70 ; Overheiser v. Lackey, 207 N. Y. 229, 233 ; Matter of MacDowell, 217 N. Y. 454 ; Matter of Durbrow, 245 N. Y. 469 ; Matter of Watson, 262 N. Y. 284 ; Matter of Catlin, 97 Misc. 223, 227 .) Words may not be capriciously rejected as meaningless but interpreted according to the perspective and context in which they are found (Matter of Pepper, 307 N. Y. 242, 251 ), and especially cogent on the issue raised is the rule that where a general benevolent purpose is manifested by a testator, the terms of the will shall be liberally construed to the end that his purpo | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Overheiser v. . Lackey
green
1 sentence1955(Adams v. Massey, 184 N. Y. 62, 70 ; Overheiser v. Lackey, 207 N. Y. 229, 233 ; Matter of MacDowell, 217 N. Y. 454 ; Matter of Durbrow, 245 N. Y. 469 ; Matter of Watson, 262 N. Y. 284 ; Matter of Catlin, 97 Misc. 223, 227 .) Words may not be capriciously rejected as meaningless but interpreted according to the perspective and context in which they are found (Matter of Pepper, 307 N. Y. 242, 251 ), and especially cogent on the issue raised is the rule that where a general benevolent purpose is manifested by a testator, the terms of the will shall be liberally construed to the end that his purpo | 1 | 1955–1955 |
In Re the Probate of the Will of Robinson
green
1 sentence1955(Matter of Neher, 279 N. Y. 370, 373-374 ; Matter of Potter, 307 N. Y. 504, 517 ; Matter of Pattberg, 282 App. Div. 770 , affd. 306 N. Y. 835 ; Matter of Robinson, 203 N. Y. 380, 388 .) Although it may approach the realm of speculation to infer that the testator envisioned the possible future separation of the Medical College from Syracuse University, nevertheless, the right to withhold income, indubitably reserved to the trustees of Syracuse University, signifies the delegation of a degree of control by which the testamentary purpose could be effectuated upon the happening of such a contingen | 1 | 1955–1955 |
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account & Proceedings of Catlin
green
1 sentence1955(Adams v. Massey, 184 N. Y. 62, 70 ; Overheiser v. Lackey, 207 N. Y. 229, 233 ; Matter of MacDowell, 217 N. Y. 454 ; Matter of Durbrow, 245 N. Y. 469 ; Matter of Watson, 262 N. Y. 284 ; Matter of Catlin, 97 Misc. 223, 227 .) Words may not be capriciously rejected as meaningless but interpreted according to the perspective and context in which they are found (Matter of Pepper, 307 N. Y. 242, 251 ), and especially cogent on the issue raised is the rule that where a general benevolent purpose is manifested by a testator, the terms of the will shall be liberally construed to the end that his purpo | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Huberman v. O'Connell
green
1 sentence1955(Matter of Neher, 279 N. Y. 370, 373-374 ; Matter of Potter, 307 N. Y. 504, 517 ; Matter of Pattberg, 282 App. Div. 770 , affd. 306 N. Y. 835 ; Matter of Robinson, 203 N. Y. 380, 388 .) Although it may approach the realm of speculation to infer that the testator envisioned the possible future separation of the Medical College from Syracuse University, nevertheless, the right to withhold income, indubitably reserved to the trustees of Syracuse University, signifies the delegation of a degree of control by which the testamentary purpose could be effectuated upon the happening of such a contingen | 1 | 1955–1955 |
In re the Accounting of Ward
green
1 sentence1955(Matter of Neher, 279 N. Y. 370, 373-374 ; Matter of Potter, 307 N. Y. 504, 517 ; Matter of Pattberg, 282 App. Div. 770 , affd. 306 N. Y. 835 ; Matter of Robinson, 203 N. Y. 380, 388 .) Although it may approach the realm of speculation to infer that the testator envisioned the possible future separation of the Medical College from Syracuse University, nevertheless, the right to withhold income, indubitably reserved to the trustees of Syracuse University, signifies the delegation of a degree of control by which the testamentary purpose could be effectuated upon the happening of such a contingen | 1 | 1955–1955 |
In re the Construction of the Will of Potter
green
1 sentence1955(Matter of Neher, 279 N. Y. 370, 373-374 ; Matter of Potter, 307 N. Y. 504, 517 ; Matter of Pattberg, 282 App. Div. 770 , affd. 306 N. Y. 835 ; Matter of Robinson, 203 N. Y. 380, 388 .) Although it may approach the realm of speculation to infer that the testator envisioned the possible future separation of the Medical College from Syracuse University, nevertheless, the right to withhold income, indubitably reserved to the trustees of Syracuse University, signifies the delegation of a degree of control by which the testamentary purpose could be effectuated upon the happening of such a contingen | 1 | 1955–1955 |
In re the Estate of Pepper
green
1 sentence1955(Adams v. Massey, 184 N. Y. 62, 70 ; Overheiser v. Lackey, 207 N. Y. 229, 233 ; Matter of MacDowell, 217 N. Y. 454 ; Matter of Durbrow, 245 N. Y. 469 ; Matter of Watson, 262 N. Y. 284 ; Matter of Catlin, 97 Misc. 223, 227 .) Words may not be capriciously rejected as meaningless but interpreted according to the perspective and context in which they are found (Matter of Pepper, 307 N. Y. 242, 251 ), and especially cogent on the issue raised is the rule that where a general benevolent purpose is manifested by a testator, the terms of the will shall be liberally construed to the end that his purpo | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Gardiner v. People
neutral
1 sentence1913The method of raising and trying the issues of law and fact which arise by the interposition of a challenge to the panel is stated in Cox v. People, 80 N. Y. 500 ; Gardner v. Turner, 9 Johns. 260 ; Gardiner v. People, 6 Park. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Cox v. . the People
green
1 sentence1913The method of raising and trying the issues of law and fact which arise by the interposition of a challenge to the panel is stated in Cox v. People, 80 N. Y. 500 ; Gardner v. Turner, 9 Johns. 260 ; Gardiner v. People, 6 Park. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Gardner v. Turner
neutral
1 sentence1913The method of raising and trying the issues of law and fact which arise by the interposition of a challenge to the panel is stated in Cox v. People, 80 N. Y. 500 ; Gardner v. Turner, 9 Johns. 260 ; Gardiner v. People, 6 Park. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.