Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Pennsylvania opinions name it 4 courts 1976–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Flaxman v. Burnettgreen1 sentence2023See also Flaxman v. Burnett, 574 A.2d 1061, 1065 (Pa. Super. 1990) (concluding that the Authority is a local agency). | 1 | 1 |
Finn v. City of Philadelphiagreen2 sentences2017The local agency exception for real property language of “care, custody or control” is different from the language in the sovereign immunity exception that waives immunity for “dangerous conditions of real property.” Notwithstanding the difference in language, under both exceptions, the test originally employed to determine whether an action was maintainable was dependent on “a legal determination that an injury was caused by a condition of government realty itself, deriving, originating from, or having the realty as its source, and, only then, the factual determination that the condition was 2017The local agency exception for real property language of “care, custody or control” is different from the language in the sovereign immunity exception that waives immunity for “dangerous conditions of real property.” Notwithstanding the difference in language, under both exceptions, the test originally employed to determine whether an action was maintainable was dependent on “a legal determination that an injury was caused by a condition of government realty itself, deriving, originating from, or having the realty as its source, and, only then, the factual determination that the condition was | 1 | 1 |
Gloffke v. Robinsongreen1 sentence2003See Gloffke v. Robinson, 812 A.2d 728, 732 (Pa. Commw. 2002). | 1 | 1 |
Murphy v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportationgreen1 sentence2000See also Murphy v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, 733 A.2d 688 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999) (“on”/”of ’ distinction continues to apply to claims under Section 8522(b)(4)); Tallada v. East Stroudsburg University of Pennsylvania, 724 A.2d 427 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999) (state university immune from liability under Section 8522(b)(4) where plaintiff alleged she fell while working in dining facility due to contents of kettle that leaked onto floor). | 1 | 1 |
Modern Shoppers World-Mt. Airy Corp. v. Philadelphia Gas Worksgreen2 sentences1998The Sanchez court reviewed numerous definitions, federal cases and Pennsylvania cases, in particular Modern Shoppers World v. Philadelphia Gas Works, 164 Pa.Cmwlth. 257 , 643 A.2d 136, 138 (1994), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 539 Pa. 683 , 652 A.2d 1327 (1994), wherein the court stated that “[f]or purposes of tort immunity, an ‘agency of a local government’ is one that has no independent legal existence, but is merely part of the organizational structure of that government or authority.” In both Modem Shoppers and Sanchez, the courts held that despite being subject to various gover 1998The Sanchez court reviewed numerous definitions, federal cases and Pennsylvania cases, in particular Modern Shoppers World v. Philadelphia Gas Works, 164 Pa.Cmwlth. 257 , 643 A.2d 136, 138 (1994), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 539 Pa. 683 , 652 A.2d 1327 (1994), wherein the court stated that “[f]or purposes of tort immunity, an ‘agency of a local government’ is one that has no independent legal existence, but is merely part of the organizational structure of that government or authority.” In both Modem Shoppers and Sanchez, the courts held that despite being subject to various gover | 1 | 1 |
Mench v. Lower Saucon Townshipgreen1 sentence1994See Mench, 159 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. at 122 n. 7, 632 A.2d at 1014 n. 7. | 1 | 1 |
Gough v. Borough of Norristowngreen2 sentences1987See Gough v. Norristown, 66 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 401 , 444 A.2d 839 (1982). 1987See Gough v. Norristown, 66 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 401 , 444 A.2d 839 (1982). | 1 | 1 |
Middle Bucks Area Vocational-Technical School v. Navarrogreen2 sentences1980It is clear that a professional employe suspended by a school district is entitled to a local agency hearing: Middle Bucks Area Vocational-Technical School v. Navarro, 37 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 278, 283 , 390 A. 2d 325, 328 (1978). 1980It is clear that a professional employe suspended by a school district is entitled to a local agency hearing: Middle Bucks Area Vocational-Technical School v. Navarro, 37 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 278, 283 , 390 A. 2d 325, 328 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Philadelphia District Attorney's Office v. Stover
green
1 sentence2019Sections 102 and 1302 of the RTKL, 65 P.S. §§ 67.102, 67.1302 ; Philadelphia District Attorney's Office v. Stover , 176 A.3d 1024 , 1027 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2017) (local agency's appeal of an OOR decision must first be filed in court of common pleas before eventually progressing to Commonwealth Court); Grine v. County of Centre , 138 A.3d 88 , 94 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2016) ( en banc ) (a county qualifies as a local agency under the RTKL). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
J.D. Grine v. County of Centre, The McShane Firm, LLC and T.C. Tanski Appeal of: County of Centre K. Gillette-Walker v. County of Centre, Shubin Law Office, P.C., and S.P. McGraw Appeal of: County of Centre
green
1 sentence2019Sections 102 and 1302 of the RTKL, 65 P.S. §§ 67.102, 67.1302 ; Philadelphia District Attorney's Office v. Stover , 176 A.3d 1024 , 1027 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2017) (local agency's appeal of an OOR decision must first be filed in court of common pleas before eventually progressing to Commonwealth Court); Grine v. County of Centre , 138 A.3d 88 , 94 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2016) ( en banc ) (a county qualifies as a local agency under the RTKL). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Tallada v. EAST STROUDSBERG UNIV. OF PA
green
1 sentence2000See also Murphy v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, 733 A.2d 688 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999) (“on”/”of ’ distinction continues to apply to claims under Section 8522(b)(4)); Tallada v. East Stroudsburg University of Pennsylvania, 724 A.2d 427 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999) (state university immune from liability under Section 8522(b)(4) where plaintiff alleged she fell while working in dining facility due to contents of kettle that leaked onto floor). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Zimmerman v. City of Johnstown
green
2 sentences1976In Zimmerman v., City of Johnstown, 27 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 42 , 365 A. 2d 696 (1976), the court declined to hold that a local agency hearing must precede the ten-day suspension of a police officer under The Third Class City Code of June 23, 1931, P.L. 932, as amended, 53 P.S. §35101. 1976In Zimmerman v., City of Johnstown, 27 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 42 , 365 A. 2d 696 (1976), the court declined to hold that a local agency hearing must precede the ten-day suspension of a police officer under The Third Class City Code of June 23, 1931, P.L. 932, as amended, 53 P.S. §35101. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.