Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Tennessee opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Shaffergreen2 sentences2015See State v. Shaffer, 45 S.W.3d 553 (Tenn. 2001). 2014See State v. Shaffer, 45 S.W.3d 553, 555 (Tenn. 2001). | 5 | 5 |
State v. Anthonygreen2 sentences2012State v. Anthony, 109 S.W.3d 377, 381-82 (Tenn. Crim. 2012State v. Anthony, 109 S.W.3d 377, 381 (Tenn. Crim. | 3 | 3 |
McGuire v. Stategreen2 sentences2010State v. Shaffer, 45 S.W.3d 553, 555 (Tenn. 2001) (“If the probation revocation warrant is issued within the term of the sentence, the issuance of the warrant commences the revocation proceedings and thereby interrupts the running of the probationary period ‘until such time as the trial court [may] hear and determine the issue raised by the [warrant].’” (quoting McGuire v. State, 292 S.W.2d 190, 193 (Tenn. 1956) (alteration in Shaffer)). 2 The habeas corpus court also determined that the Petitioner had failed to include copies of the judgment forms in the record. 2010See State v. Shaffer, 45 S.W.3d 553, 555 (Tenn. 2001) (“If the probation revocation warrant is issued within the term of the sentence, the issuance of the warrant commences the revocation proceedings and thereby interrupts the running of the probationary period ‘until such time as the trial court [may] hear and determine the issue raised by the [warrant].’” (quoting McGuire v. State, 292 S.W.2d 190, 193 (Tenn. 1956) (alteration in Shaffer)). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Chloe Clarkgreen1 sentence2004State v. Clark, 970 S.W.2d 516, 518 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lewisgreen1 sentence2001State v. Lewis, 917 S.W.2d 251, 256 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.