Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kolbe v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPgreen2 sentences2014Kolbe v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, 695 F.3d 111, 123 (1st Cir. 2012) (quoting Brunswick Hills Racquet Club, Inc. v. Route 18 Shopping Ctr. 2013Kolbe v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, 695 F.3d 111, 123 (1st Cir.2012) (quoting Brunswick Hills Racquet Club, Inc. v. Route 18 Shopping Ctr. | 3 | 3 |
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrettgreen2 sentences2002Citing Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208 (Tenn.1993), and Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986), Defendants contend that summary judgment is appropriate where the moving party shows the plaintiff has no proof to establish a necessary element of her claim. 2002Citing Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208 (Tenn.1993), and Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986), Defendants contend that summary judgment is appropriate where the moving party shows the plaintiff has no proof to establish a necessary element of her claim. | 1 | 2 |
Green v. Greengreen1 sentence2014Green v. Green, 293 S.W.3d 493, 497 (Tenn. 2009). | 1 | 1 |
Tennessee Department of Human Services v. Hintongreen1 sentence1997Tennessee Dept. of Human Services v. Hinton, 660 S.W.2d 506, 510 (Tenn. App. 1983). | 1 | 1 |
Califano v. Bolesgreen2 sentences1983See Califano v. Boles, 443 U.S. 282, 295 , 99 S.Ct. 2767, 2774 , 61 L.Ed.2d 541 (1979). 1983See Califano v. Boles, 443 U.S. 282, 295 , 99 S.Ct. 2767, 2774 , 61 L.Ed.2d 541 (1979). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Toste
green
2 sentences2014A necessary element to waiver is the requisite knowledge of the right and a waiver presupposes a full knowledge of an existing right or privilege and something done designedly or knowingly to relinquish it.” Id. at 629-30 , 424 A.2d 293 . 2014A necessary element to waiver is the requisite knowledge of the right and a waiver presupposes a full knowledge of an existing right or privilege and something done designedly or knowingly to relinquish it.” Id. at 629-30 , 424 A.2d 293 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Byrd v. Hall
green
2 sentences2002Citing Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208 (Tenn.1993), and Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986), Defendants contend that summary judgment is appropriate where the moving party shows the plaintiff has no proof to establish a necessary element of her claim. 2002Citing Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208 (Tenn.1993), and Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986), Defendants contend that summary judgment is appropriate where the moving party shows the plaintiff has no proof to establish a necessary element of her claim. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Waste Management, Inc. v. South Central Bell Telephone Co.
green
1 sentence2001White v. Lawrence, 975 S.W.2d at 529 ; Waste M anage ment, Inc ., 15 S.W.3d at 429-30 . 8 Thus, foreseeability is a necessary element of the analysis of both proximate cause and intervening cause.4 The test of liability under the law of intervening cause requires a person to anticipate or foresee what usually will happen. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
White Ex Rel. Estate of White v. Lawrence
green
1 sentence2001White v. Lawrence, 975 S.W.2d at 529 ; Waste M anage ment, Inc ., 15 S.W.3d at 429-30 . 8 Thus, foreseeability is a necessary element of the analysis of both proximate cause and intervening cause.4 The test of liability under the law of intervening cause requires a person to anticipate or foresee what usually will happen. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.