federal case-or-controversy requirement (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

federal case-or-controversy requirement in Washington

10 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2026 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
To-Ro Trade Shows v. Collinsgreen
wash · 2001 · cited in 7 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2004–2026
2 sentences

2026Justiciability incorporates “ ‘ the traditional limiting doctrines of standing, mootness, and ripeness, as well as the federal case-or- controversy requirement.’ ” Wash. State Council of County & City Emps. v. City of Spokane, 200 Wn.2d 678 , 685, 520 P.3d 991 (2022) (quoting To-Ro Trade Shows, 144 Wn.2d at 411 ).

2023Lakehaven Water and Sewer Dist. v. City of Federal Way, 195 Wn.2d 742 , 769, 466 P.3d 213 (2020); Wash. State Council of County and City Emps. v. City of Spokane, 200 Wn.2d 678 , 685, 520 P.3d 991 (2022) (“ ‘Inherent in these four requirements are the traditional limiting doctrines of standing, mootness, and 11 The first two arbitrations resulted in two opposing views of the definition of “units sold.” 20 No. 84265-0-I/21 ripeness, as well as the federal case-or-controversy requirement.’ ” (quoting To- Ro Trade Shows, 144 Wn.2d at 411 )); To-Ro Trade Shows, 144 Wn.2d at 414 (the third justicia

17

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
To-Ro Trade Shows v. Collins green
wash · 2001
2 sentences

2018Claims for declaratory relief must meet "the traditional limiting doctrines of standing, mootness, and ripeness, as well as the federal case-or-controversy requirement." To-Ro Trade Shows v. Collins, 144 Wn.2d 403, 411 , 27 P.3d 1149 (2001).

2004"Inherent in these four requirements are the traditional limiting doctrines of standing, mootness, and ripeness, as well as the federal case-or-controversy requirement." Id.

22004–2018
City of Longview v. Wallin green
washctapp · 2013
1 sentence

2018City of Longview v. Wallin, 174 Wn.

12018–2018
Diversified Industries Development Corp. v. Ripley green
wash · 1973
1 sentence

2015“Inherent in these four requirements are the traditional limiting doctrines of standing, mootness, and ripeness, as well as the federal case-or-controversy requirement.” Id.

12015–2015
American Legion Post No. 149 v. Department of Health green
wash · 2008
1 sentence

2013Legion Post No. 149 v. Dep’t of Health, 164 Wn.2d 570, 593 , 192 P.3d 306 (2008).

12013–2013
American Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTH green
wash · 2008
1 sentence

2013Legion Post No. 149 v. Dep’t of Health, 164 Wn.2d 570, 593 , 192 P.3d 306 (2008).

12013–2013

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 7.24.010 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 7.24.020 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 7.24.120 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

WA 10 (2004–2026) MI 3 (2010–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check