Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Alaska opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Keating v. Traynorgreen2 sentences1996See Waggoner, 904 P.2d at 1235 (remanding for specific findings after trial court denied motion to.modify divorce decree); Keating v. Traynor, 833 P.2d 695, 696-97 (Alaska 1992) (remanding for specific findings after trial court modified support order as requested by CSED motion). 6 . 1995Compare Keating v. Traynor, 833 P.2d 695 , 696 & n. 2 (Alaska 1992) (allowing custodial mother who had assigned right to support to CSED to intervene in CSED’s motion to modify prior support order because her interest was “inadequately represented” by agency). | 2 | 2 |
State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. Allsopgreen1 sentence2010See State, Dep't of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Div. v. Allsop, 902 P.2d 790, 795-96 (Alaska 1995) (assessing viability of CSED's defense de novo and reviewing factual findings for clear error in reversing decision to award presumed father Rule 82 full fees in child support collection case). 12 . | 1 | 1 |
Crb v. Ccgreen1 sentence2000NOTES [1] 882 P.2d 1252, 1257 (Alaska 1994) (requiring both parents to pay support to third-party custodian). [2] C.R.B. v. C.C., 959 P.2d 375, 378 (Alaska 1998) (internal punctuation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Gallant v. Gallantgreen1 sentence2000NOTES [1] 882 P.2d 1252, 1257 (Alaska 1994) (requiring both parents to pay support to third-party custodian). [2] C.R.B. v. C.C., 959 P.2d 375, 378 (Alaska 1998) (internal punctuation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
American Jewish Congress v. City Of Beverly Hillsgreen2 sentences1999By the same token Boone directly answers CSED’s claim that applying the “good cause exception would amount to an impermissible ‘retroactive variance.’” See supra notes 11-12 and accompanying text. .Compare, e.g., American Jewish Congress v. City of Beverly Hills, 90 F.3d 379 , 386 (9th Cir.1996) (noting that formal standards discourage "post hoc rationalizations ... and the use of shifting or illegitimate criteria” and enable appellate review) with Amerada Hess Pipeline Corp. v. Alaska Pub. 1999The prevailing party bears no burden to justify such awards, and no findings by the court are necessary."); accord Babinec v. Yabuki, 799 P.2d 1325, 1337 (Alaska 1990). [10] 931 P.2d 371, 382-83 (Alaska 1996). [11] 960 P.2d 579, 581-82, 584 (Alaska 1998). [12] Id. at 584 . [13] By the same token Boone directly answers CSED's claim that applying the "good cause exception would amount to an impermissible `retroactive variance.'" See supra notes 11-12 and accompanying text. [14] Compare, e.g., American Jewish Congress v. City of Beverly Hills, 90 F.3d 379 , 386 (9th Cir.1996) (noting that formal | 1 | 1 |
Vachon v. Pugliesegreen1 sentence1999The prevailing party bears no burden to justify such awards, and no findings by the court are necessary."); accord Babinec v. Yabuki, 799 P.2d 1325, 1337 (Alaska 1990). [10] 931 P.2d 371, 382-83 (Alaska 1996). [11] 960 P.2d 579, 581-82, 584 (Alaska 1998). [12] Id. at 584 . [13] By the same token Boone directly answers CSED's claim that applying the "good cause exception would amount to an impermissible `retroactive variance.'" See supra notes 11-12 and accompanying text. [14] Compare, e.g., American Jewish Congress v. City of Beverly Hills, 90 F.3d 379 , 386 (9th Cir.1996) (noting that formal | 1 | 1 |
Dodson v. Dodsongreen1 sentence1999P. 90.3(h)(2); Boone v. Gipson, 920 P.2d 746, 749-51 (Alaska 1996). [6] See Gipson, 920 P.2d at 748 (citing M.R.S. v. State, 897 P.2d 63, 66 (Alaska 1995)). [7] See Monette v. Hoff, 958 P.2d 434, 436 (Alaska 1998). [8] See Dodson v. Dodson, 955 P.2d 902, 905 (Alaska 1998). [9] Marine v. Marine, 957 P.2d 314, 316 (Alaska 1998) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). [10] CSED also argues that the superior court should not have held a hearing on CSED's motion to reduce David's arrears to judgment because David did not file an affidavit conforming to AS 25.27.226. | 1 | 1 |
Guin v. Hagreen1 sentence1999See State, CSED v. Gerke, 942 P.2d 423, 425 (Alaska 1997) (quoting Guin v. Ha, 591 P.2d 1281, 1284 (Alaska 1979)). 2 . 938 P.2d 1013 (Alaska 1997). 3 . | 1 | 1 |
Monette v. Hoffgreen1 sentence1999P. 90.3(h)(2); Boone v. Gipson, 920 P.2d 746, 749-51 (Alaska 1996). [6] See Gipson, 920 P.2d at 748 (citing M.R.S. v. State, 897 P.2d 63, 66 (Alaska 1995)). [7] See Monette v. Hoff, 958 P.2d 434, 436 (Alaska 1998). [8] See Dodson v. Dodson, 955 P.2d 902, 905 (Alaska 1998). [9] Marine v. Marine, 957 P.2d 314, 316 (Alaska 1998) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). [10] CSED also argues that the superior court should not have held a hearing on CSED's motion to reduce David's arrears to judgment because David did not file an affidavit conforming to AS 25.27.226. | 1 | 1 |
Boone v. Boonegreen2 sentences1999The prevailing party bears no burden to justify such awards, and no findings by the court are necessary."); accord Babinec v. Yabuki, 799 P.2d 1325, 1337 (Alaska 1990). [10] 931 P.2d 371, 382-83 (Alaska 1996). [11] 960 P.2d 579, 581-82, 584 (Alaska 1998). [12] Id. at 584 . [13] By the same token Boone directly answers CSED's claim that applying the "good cause exception would amount to an impermissible `retroactive variance.'" See supra notes 11-12 and accompanying text. [14] Compare, e.g., American Jewish Congress v. City of Beverly Hills, 90 F.3d 379 , 386 (9th Cir.1996) (noting that formal 1999The prevailing party bears no burden to justify such awards, and no findings by the court are necessary."); accord Babinec v. Yabuki, 799 P.2d 1325, 1337 (Alaska 1990). [10] 931 P.2d 371, 382-83 (Alaska 1996). [11] 960 P.2d 579, 581-82, 584 (Alaska 1998). [12] Id. at 584 . [13] By the same token Boone directly answers CSED's claim that applying the "good cause exception would amount to an impermissible `retroactive variance.'" See supra notes 11-12 and accompanying text. [14] Compare, e.g., American Jewish Congress v. City of Beverly Hills, 90 F.3d 379 , 386 (9th Cir.1996) (noting that formal | 1 | 1 |
State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. Hawthorne v. Riosgreen1 sentence1999See State, CSED v. Gerke, 942 P.2d 423, 425 (Alaska 1997) (quoting Guin v. Ha, 591 P.2d 1281, 1284 (Alaska 1979)). 2 . 938 P.2d 1013 (Alaska 1997). 3 . | 1 | 1 |
State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division, Ex Rel. Gerke v. Gerkegreen1 sentence1999See State, CSED v. Gerke, 942 P.2d 423, 425 (Alaska 1997) (quoting Guin v. Ha, 591 P.2d 1281, 1284 (Alaska 1979)). 2 . 938 P.2d 1013 (Alaska 1997). 3 . | 1 | 1 |
Babinec v. Yabukigreen1 sentence1999The prevailing party bears no burden to justify such awards, and no findings by the court are necessary."); accord Babinec v. Yabuki, 799 P.2d 1325, 1337 (Alaska 1990). [10] 931 P.2d 371, 382-83 (Alaska 1996). [11] 960 P.2d 579, 581-82, 584 (Alaska 1998). [12] Id. at 584 . [13] By the same token Boone directly answers CSED's claim that applying the "good cause exception would amount to an impermissible `retroactive variance.'" See supra notes 11-12 and accompanying text. [14] Compare, e.g., American Jewish Congress v. City of Beverly Hills, 90 F.3d 379 , 386 (9th Cir.1996) (noting that formal | 1 | 1 |
Boone v. Gipsongreen2 sentences1999P. 90.3(h)(2); Boone v. Gipson, 920 P.2d 746, 749-51 (Alaska 1996). [6] See Gipson, 920 P.2d at 748 (citing M.R.S. v. State, 897 P.2d 63, 66 (Alaska 1995)). [7] See Monette v. Hoff, 958 P.2d 434, 436 (Alaska 1998). [8] See Dodson v. Dodson, 955 P.2d 902, 905 (Alaska 1998). [9] Marine v. Marine, 957 P.2d 314, 316 (Alaska 1998) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). [10] CSED also argues that the superior court should not have held a hearing on CSED's motion to reduce David's arrears to judgment because David did not file an affidavit conforming to AS 25.27.226. 1999P. 90.3(h)(2); Boone v. Gipson, 920 P.2d 746, 749-51 (Alaska 1996). [6] See Gipson, 920 P.2d at 748 (citing M.R.S. v. State, 897 P.2d 63, 66 (Alaska 1995)). [7] See Monette v. Hoff, 958 P.2d 434, 436 (Alaska 1998). [8] See Dodson v. Dodson, 955 P.2d 902, 905 (Alaska 1998). [9] Marine v. Marine, 957 P.2d 314, 316 (Alaska 1998) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). [10] CSED also argues that the superior court should not have held a hearing on CSED's motion to reduce David's arrears to judgment because David did not file an affidavit conforming to AS 25.27.226. | 1 | 1 |
State of Alaska, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. Constance L. Gause, v. Thomas Gausegreen1 sentence1999See Gause, 967 P.2d at 603 . | 1 | 1 |
Marine v. Marinegreen1 sentence1999P. 90.3(h)(2); Boone v. Gipson, 920 P.2d 746, 749-51 (Alaska 1996). [6] See Gipson, 920 P.2d at 748 (citing M.R.S. v. State, 897 P.2d 63, 66 (Alaska 1995)). [7] See Monette v. Hoff, 958 P.2d 434, 436 (Alaska 1998). [8] See Dodson v. Dodson, 955 P.2d 902, 905 (Alaska 1998). [9] Marine v. Marine, 957 P.2d 314, 316 (Alaska 1998) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). [10] CSED also argues that the superior court should not have held a hearing on CSED's motion to reduce David's arrears to judgment because David did not file an affidavit conforming to AS 25.27.226. | 1 | 1 |
MRS v. Stategreen1 sentence1999P. 90.3(h)(2); Boone v. Gipson, 920 P.2d 746, 749-51 (Alaska 1996). [6] See Gipson, 920 P.2d at 748 (citing M.R.S. v. State, 897 P.2d 63, 66 (Alaska 1995)). [7] See Monette v. Hoff, 958 P.2d 434, 436 (Alaska 1998). [8] See Dodson v. Dodson, 955 P.2d 902, 905 (Alaska 1998). [9] Marine v. Marine, 957 P.2d 314, 316 (Alaska 1998) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). [10] CSED also argues that the superior court should not have held a hearing on CSED's motion to reduce David's arrears to judgment because David did not file an affidavit conforming to AS 25.27.226. | 1 | 1 |
Weaver v. Chestergreen2 sentences1997See Weaver v. Chester, 195 Ga.App. 471 , 393 S.E.2d 715, 717 (1990) (‘‘[I]t is not the father’s obligation to support the child which is made contingent upon an adjudication of paternity but simply the right to enforce that legal obligation through legal process.”) (superseded by statute in other respects); Commonwealth v. Chase, 385 Mass. 461 , 432 N.E.2d 510, 517 (1982); Tidwell v. Booker, 290 N.C. 98 , 225 S.E.2d 816, 827 (1976). 6 . 1997See Weaver v. Chester, 195 Ga.App. 471 , 393 S.E.2d 715, 717 (1990) (‘‘[I]t is not the father’s obligation to support the child which is made contingent upon an adjudication of paternity but simply the right to enforce that legal obligation through legal process.”) (superseded by statute in other respects); Commonwealth v. Chase, 385 Mass. 461 , 432 N.E.2d 510, 517 (1982); Tidwell v. Booker, 290 N.C. 98 , 225 S.E.2d 816, 827 (1976). 6 . | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Chasegreen2 sentences1997See Weaver v. Chester, 195 Ga.App. 471 , 393 S.E.2d 715, 717 (1990) (‘‘[I]t is not the father’s obligation to support the child which is made contingent upon an adjudication of paternity but simply the right to enforce that legal obligation through legal process.”) (superseded by statute in other respects); Commonwealth v. Chase, 385 Mass. 461 , 432 N.E.2d 510, 517 (1982); Tidwell v. Booker, 290 N.C. 98 , 225 S.E.2d 816, 827 (1976). 6 . 1997See Weaver v. Chester, 195 Ga.App. 471 , 393 S.E.2d 715, 717 (1990) (‘‘[I]t is not the father’s obligation to support the child which is made contingent upon an adjudication of paternity but simply the right to enforce that legal obligation through legal process.”) (superseded by statute in other respects); Commonwealth v. Chase, 385 Mass. 461 , 432 N.E.2d 510, 517 (1982); Tidwell v. Booker, 290 N.C. 98 , 225 S.E.2d 816, 827 (1976). 6 . | 1 | 1 |
Tidwell v. Bookergreen2 sentences1997See Weaver v. Chester, 195 Ga.App. 471 , 393 S.E.2d 715, 717 (1990) (‘‘[I]t is not the father’s obligation to support the child which is made contingent upon an adjudication of paternity but simply the right to enforce that legal obligation through legal process.”) (superseded by statute in other respects); Commonwealth v. Chase, 385 Mass. 461 , 432 N.E.2d 510, 517 (1982); Tidwell v. Booker, 290 N.C. 98 , 225 S.E.2d 816, 827 (1976). 6 . 1997See Weaver v. Chester, 195 Ga.App. 471 , 393 S.E.2d 715, 717 (1990) (‘‘[I]t is not the father’s obligation to support the child which is made contingent upon an adjudication of paternity but simply the right to enforce that legal obligation through legal process.”) (superseded by statute in other respects); Commonwealth v. Chase, 385 Mass. 461 , 432 N.E.2d 510, 517 (1982); Tidwell v. Booker, 290 N.C. 98 , 225 S.E.2d 816, 827 (1976). 6 . | 1 | 1 |
Waggoner v. Fostergreen1 sentence1996See Waggoner, 904 P.2d at 1235 (remanding for specific findings after trial court denied motion to.modify divorce decree); Keating v. Traynor, 833 P.2d 695, 696-97 (Alaska 1992) (remanding for specific findings after trial court modified support order as requested by CSED motion). 6 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.