Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Mose Franklin Pearsongreen2 sentences2016United States v. Pearson, 667 F.2d 12, 15 (5th Cir.1982).’ “Smith v. State, 551 So.2d 1161, 1168-69 (Ala.Crim.App.1989),” Hall, 203 So.3d at 1281 . 2016United States v. Pearson , 667 F.2d 12 , 15 (5th Cir. 1982).' " Smith v. State , 551 So.2d 1161 , 1168-69 (Ala. Crim. | 6 | 9 |
Smith v. Stategreen2 sentences2016United States v. Pearson, 667 F.2d 12, 15 (5th Cir.1982).’ “Smith v. State, 551 So.2d 1161, 1168-69 (Ala.Crim.App.1989),” Hall, 203 So.3d at 1281 . 2016United States v. Pearson , 667 F.2d 12 , 15 (5th Cir. 1982).' " Smith v. State , 551 So.2d 1161 , 1168-69 (Ala. Crim. | 6 | 8 |
Johnson v. Stategreen1 sentence2001United States v. Pearson, 667 F.2d 12, 15 (5th Cir.1982)." Smith v. State, 551 So.2d 1161, 1168-69 (Ala.Crim.App.1989); Hunt v. State, 659 So.2d 933, 950 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), aff'd, 659 So.2d 960 (Ala.1995)(classification of offense as a felony, while erroneous, was mere surplusage); Pardue v. State, 571 So.2d 320, 328 (Ala.Crim.App.1989)(value of stolen pistol, though alleged in the indictment, was surplusage and did not have to be proven), rev'd on other grounds, 571 So.2d 333 (Ala.1990); Lunceford v. City of Northport, 555 So.2d 246 (Ala.Crim.App. 1988) (because the location of alleged DUI | 1 | 1 |
Cauley v. Stategreen2 sentences2001United States v. Pearson, 667 F.2d 12, 15 (5th Cir.1982)." Smith v. State, 551 So.2d 1161, 1168-69 (Ala.Crim.App.1989); Hunt v. State, 659 So.2d 933, 950 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), aff'd, 659 So.2d 960 (Ala.1995)(classification of offense as a felony, while erroneous, was mere surplusage); Pardue v. State, 571 So.2d 320, 328 (Ala.Crim.App.1989)(value of stolen pistol, though alleged in the indictment, was surplusage and did not have to be proven), rev'd on other grounds, 571 So.2d 333 (Ala.1990); Lunceford v. City of Northport, 555 So.2d 246 (Ala.Crim.App. 1988) (because the location of alleged DUI 2001United States v. Pearson, 667 F.2d 12, 15 (5th Cir.1982)." Smith v. State, 551 So.2d 1161, 1168-69 (Ala.Crim.App.1989); Hunt v. State, 659 So.2d 933, 950 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), aff'd, 659 So.2d 960 (Ala.1995)(classification of offense as a felony, while erroneous, was mere surplusage); Pardue v. State, 571 So.2d 320, 328 (Ala.Crim.App.1989)(value of stolen pistol, though alleged in the indictment, was surplusage and did not have to be proven), rev'd on other grounds, 571 So.2d 333 (Ala.1990); Lunceford v. City of Northport, 555 So.2d 246 (Ala.Crim.App. 1988) (because the location of alleged DUI | 1 | 1 |
Pardue v. Stategreen1 sentence2001United States v. Pearson, 667 F.2d 12, 15 (5th Cir.1982)." Smith v. State, 551 So.2d 1161, 1168-69 (Ala.Crim.App.1989); Hunt v. State, 659 So.2d 933, 950 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), aff'd, 659 So.2d 960 (Ala.1995)(classification of offense as a felony, while erroneous, was mere surplusage); Pardue v. State, 571 So.2d 320, 328 (Ala.Crim.App.1989)(value of stolen pistol, though alleged in the indictment, was surplusage and did not have to be proven), rev'd on other grounds, 571 So.2d 333 (Ala.1990); Lunceford v. City of Northport, 555 So.2d 246 (Ala.Crim.App. 1988) (because the location of alleged DUI | 1 | 1 |
Hunt v. Stategreen1 sentence2001United States v. Pearson, 667 F.2d 12, 15 (5th Cir.1982)." Smith v. State, 551 So.2d 1161, 1168-69 (Ala.Crim.App.1989); Hunt v. State, 659 So.2d 933, 950 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), aff'd, 659 So.2d 960 (Ala.1995)(classification of offense as a felony, while erroneous, was mere surplusage); Pardue v. State, 571 So.2d 320, 328 (Ala.Crim.App.1989)(value of stolen pistol, though alleged in the indictment, was surplusage and did not have to be proven), rev'd on other grounds, 571 So.2d 333 (Ala.1990); Lunceford v. City of Northport, 555 So.2d 246 (Ala.Crim.App. 1988) (because the location of alleged DUI | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hall v. State
neutral
1 sentence2016United States v. Pearson, 667 F.2d 12, 15 (5th Cir.1982).’ “Smith v. State, 551 So.2d 1161, 1168-69 (Ala.Crim.App.1989),” Hall, 203 So.3d at 1281 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Pardue v. State
green
1 sentence2001United States v. Pearson, 667 F.2d 12, 15 (5th Cir.1982)." Smith v. State, 551 So.2d 1161, 1168-69 (Ala.Crim.App.1989); Hunt v. State, 659 So.2d 933, 950 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), aff'd, 659 So.2d 960 (Ala.1995)(classification of offense as a felony, while erroneous, was mere surplusage); Pardue v. State, 571 So.2d 320, 328 (Ala.Crim.App.1989)(value of stolen pistol, though alleged in the indictment, was surplusage and did not have to be proven), rev'd on other grounds, 571 So.2d 333 (Ala.1990); Lunceford v. City of Northport, 555 So.2d 246 (Ala.Crim.App. 1988) (because the location of alleged DUI | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Ex Parte Hunt
green
1 sentence2001United States v. Pearson, 667 F.2d 12, 15 (5th Cir.1982)." Smith v. State, 551 So.2d 1161, 1168-69 (Ala.Crim.App.1989); Hunt v. State, 659 So.2d 933, 950 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), aff'd, 659 So.2d 960 (Ala.1995)(classification of offense as a felony, while erroneous, was mere surplusage); Pardue v. State, 571 So.2d 320, 328 (Ala.Crim.App.1989)(value of stolen pistol, though alleged in the indictment, was surplusage and did not have to be proven), rev'd on other grounds, 571 So.2d 333 (Ala.1990); Lunceford v. City of Northport, 555 So.2d 246 (Ala.Crim.App. 1988) (because the location of alleged DUI | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Lunceford v. City of Northport
green
1 sentence2001United States v. Pearson, 667 F.2d 12, 15 (5th Cir.1982)." Smith v. State, 551 So.2d 1161, 1168-69 (Ala.Crim.App.1989); Hunt v. State, 659 So.2d 933, 950 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), aff'd, 659 So.2d 960 (Ala.1995)(classification of offense as a felony, while erroneous, was mere surplusage); Pardue v. State, 571 So.2d 320, 328 (Ala.Crim.App.1989)(value of stolen pistol, though alleged in the indictment, was surplusage and did not have to be proven), rev'd on other grounds, 571 So.2d 333 (Ala.1990); Lunceford v. City of Northport, 555 So.2d 246 (Ala.Crim.App. 1988) (because the location of alleged DUI | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.