Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Colorado opinions name it 1 courts 1997–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Kleingreen2 sentences2008In People v. Klein, 756 P.2d 1013, 1016 (Colo.1988), the Colorado Supreme Court declared that the rehabilitation assessment "must include the consideration of numerous factors bearing on the [attorney's] state of mind and ability." 4 These factors include but are not limited to: e Character; e Conduct since the imposition of discipline; ® Professional competence; ® Candor and sincerity; e Recommendations of other witnesses; ® Present business pursuits; ® Personal and community service; and e Recognition of the seriousness of previous misconduct. 2008In People v. Klein, 756 P.2d 1013, 1016 (Colo.1988), the Colorado Supreme Court declared that the rehabilitation assessment "must include the consideration of numerous factors bearing on the [attorney's] state of mind and ability." 5 These factors include but are not limited to: e Character; @ Conduct since the imposition of discipline; ® Professional competence; ® Candor and sincerity; ® Recommendations of other witnesses; e Present business pursuits; ® Personal and community service; and & Recognition of the seriousness of previous misconduct. | 8 | 8 |
Goff v. Peoplegreen2 sentences2006People v. Klein, 756 P.2d 1013, 1016 (Colo.1988); see also Goff v. People, 35 P.3d 487 (Colo.O.P.D.J.2000); and Lockley v. People, 96 P.3d 236 (Colo.O.P.D.J.2004). 14 The Hearing Board finds by clear and convincing evidence that Petitioner is now rehabilitated, has complied with all the applicable rules in the reinstatement, and therefore should be reinstated subject to the conditions set forth at the conclusion of this opinion and order. 2006People v. Klein, 756 P.2d 1013, 1016 (Colo.1988); see also Goff v. People, 35 P.3d 487 (Colo.O.P.D.J.2000); and Lockley v. People, 96 P.3d 236 (Colo.O.P.D.J.2004). 13 Petitioner engaged in serious misconduct when he lied to a district court judge. | 4 | 4 |
Conley v. Greenwood Trust Co.green2 sentences1997Conley, 923 P.2d at 309 . 1997Conley, 923 P.2d at 309 (alteration in original). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lockley v. People
neutral
2 sentences2006People v. Klein, 756 P.2d 1013, 1016 (Colo.1988); see also Goff v. People, 35 P.3d 487 (Colo.O.P.D.J.2000); and Lockley v. People, 96 P.3d 236 (Colo.O.P.D.J.2004). 14 The Hearing Board finds by clear and convincing evidence that Petitioner is now rehabilitated, has complied with all the applicable rules in the reinstatement, and therefore should be reinstated subject to the conditions set forth at the conclusion of this opinion and order. 2006People v. Klein, 756 P.2d 1013, 1016 (Colo.1988); see also Goff v. People, 35 P.3d 487 (Colo.O.P.D.J.2000); and Lockley v. People, 96 P.3d 236 (Colo.O.P.D.J.2004). 13 Petitioner engaged in serious misconduct when he lied to a district court judge. | 4 | 2006–2006 |
Keohane v. Stewart
green
1 sentence1997Cf. Keohane, 882 P.2d at 1297 . *1149 Finally, the court of appeals held that section 5-5-108 requires a consideration of numerous factors to determine whether a creditor's actions have been unconscionable. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.