Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
J. D. B. v. North Carolinagreen1 sentence2014See J.D.B., 131 S.Ct. at 2407 ("[O)fficers and judges need no imaginative powers, knowledge of developmental psychology, training in cognitive science, or expertise in social and cultural anthropology to account for a child's age. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Mathenygreen1 sentence2014The court further found that defendant was not in custody while in the waiting room at the police department, noting that "[plolice interrogation at a stationhouse does not necessarily render the interrogation custodial for purposes of the Mirando warning." People v. Matheny, 46 P.3d 453, 466 (Colo.2002). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Raffaelligreen1 sentence2013Raffaelli, 647 P.2d at 235 ("The fact that Miranda warnings precede a challenged confession does not insulate that confession from an inquiry into whether it was voluntarily given."). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Davisgreen1 sentence2012See United States v. Davis, 530 F.3d 1069, 1082 (9th Cir.2008) (holding that questions consistent with a Terry stop during execution of search warrant, including those intended to obtain the identity of the suspect and confirm or dispel officer's suspicions that suspect was involved in marijuana grow operation on the property, did not require Mirando warnings). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Gennings
green
2 sentences2011In spite of the techniques used by the polygraph examiner, including informing the defendant that he had been deceptive on the exam, and conveying a supportive attitude toward his predicament and telling him that he would feel better if he talked to her about the problem, we could not say this conduct played so significant a role in overbearing the defendant's will as to have caused the defendant's statement to be constitutionally involuntary. 808 P.2d at 846-47 . 2010Id. | 3 | 2001–2011 |
People v. Quezada
green
1 sentence2009Id. at 734-36 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Oregon v. Mathiason
green
2 sentences2002Mirando warnings are required only where there has been such a restriction on a person's freedom as to render him "in custody." It was that sort of coercive environment to which Miranda by its terms was made applicable, and to which it is limited. 429 U.S. at 495 , 97 S.Ct. 711 . 2002Mirando warnings are required only where there has been such a restriction on a person's freedom as to render him "in custody." It was that sort of coercive environment to which Miranda by its terms was made applicable, and to which it is limited. 429 U.S. at 495 , 97 S.Ct. 711 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.