9 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1947–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rainforest Cafe, Inc. v. Department of Revenue Servicesgreen2 sentences2010See, e.g., Rainforest Cafe, Inc. v. Dept. of Revenue Services, 293 Conn. 363, 371 , 977 A.2d 650 (2009). 2010See, e.g., Rainforest Cafe, Inc. v. Dept. of Revenue Services, 293 Conn. 363, 371 , 977 A.2d 650 (2009). | 1 | 1 |
Tadros v. Tripodigreen2 sentences2006See Tadros v. Tripodi, 87 Conn. App. 321, 329-30 , 866 A.2d 610 (2005) (expert opinion regarded as evidence in its own right, and evidence sufficient where defense counsel does not object to expert accountant’s testimony regarding conclusions as to amount of money stolen by defendants, which testimony was based in part on report court admitted for limited purpose of showing bases of opinion). 2006See Tadros v. Tripodi, 87 Conn. App. 321, 329-30 , 866 A.2d 610 (2005) (expert opinion regarded as evidence in its own right, and evidence sufficient where defense counsel does not object to expert accountant’s testimony regarding conclusions as to amount of money stolen by defendants, which testimony was based in part on report court admitted for limited purpose of showing bases of opinion). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gold v. McDermott
green
1 sentence2011Section 12-55 neither refers to the making or inspection of assessment records nor expressly limits public inspection to grand lists only." Id., at 590, 347 A.2d 643 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
National Publishing Co. v. Hartford Fire Insurance
neutral
2 sentences2008Co., 94 Conn.App. 234, 237 , 892 A.2d 261 (2006). [9] For purposes of the certified question, there is no dispute that, if this court concludes that the trial court improperly failed to charge the jury on Hartford's defense of late notice, then we also must decide whether that impropriety was harmful. [10] I do agree with the majority that the trial court should have given the requested charge because the timeliness of the notice was a question for the jury to decide. 2008Co., 94 Conn.App. 234, 237 , 892 A.2d 261 (2006). [9] For purposes of the certified question, there is no dispute that, if this court concludes that the trial court improperly failed to charge the jury on Hartford's defense of late notice, then we also must decide whether that impropriety was harmful. [10] I do agree with the majority that the trial court should have given the requested charge because the timeliness of the notice was a question for the jury to decide. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
green
1 sentence2007Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., supra, 255 Conn. 295 , the MacArthur claims were caused by multiple occurrences, namely, the exposure of each claimant to asbestos, and these multiple occurrences could not have constituted a “common cause or causes” under the treaty. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Wellington Systems, Inc. v. Redding Group, Inc.
green
1 sentence2000"It is well-settled that the tort of interference with contractual relations only lies when a third party adversely affects the contractual relations of two other parties." (Emphasis in original.) Wellington Systems, Inc. v. Redding Group, Inc. , 49 Conn. App. 152 , 168 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Johndrow v. State
green
1 sentence1995For this proposition the defendants cite the case of Johndrow v. State of Connecticut, 24 Conn. App. 719 (1991), and quote the following from its text: The trial court was also correct in not considering Hartford's motion to substitute Nutmeg as intervenor. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.
green
2 sentences1992“When reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion for summary judgment, we must decide whether the trial court erred in determining that there was no ‘genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.’ Practice Book § 384; Mingachos v. CBS, Inc., 196 Conn. 91, 111 , 491 A.2d 368 (1985); D.H.R. 1992“When reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion for summary judgment, we must decide whether the trial court erred in determining that there was no ‘genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.’ Practice Book § 384; Mingachos v. CBS, Inc., 196 Conn. 91, 111 , 491 A.2d 368 (1985); D.H.R. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Muolo
green
1 sentence1947Beardsley v. Hartford, 50 Conn. 529, 541 ; State v. Muolo, supra. As stated by Aaron Nassau of the Hartford bar in his article, “Some Feudal Relics in the Connecticut Land Law,” 19 Conn. Bar J., 216, 233, referring to the doctrine of worthier title, among other rules,. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Beardsley v. City of Hartford
green
1 sentence1947Beardsley v. Hartford, 50 Conn. 529, 541 ; State v. Muolo, supra. As stated by Aaron Nassau of the Hartford bar in his article, “Some Feudal Relics in the Connecticut Land Law,” 19 Conn. Bar J., 216, 233, referring to the doctrine of worthier title, among other rules,. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.