Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1975–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
BHP Petroleum Co., Inc. v. Millardgreen2 sentences2010See BHP Petroleum Co., Inc. v. Millard , 800 S.W.2d 838, 841 (Tex. 1990) (UDJA not available to settle issues already pending before the court); see also Charlie Thomas Ford, Inc. v. A.C. 2010See BHP Petroleum Co., Inc. v. Millard, 800 S.W.2d 838, 841 (Tex. 1990) (UDJA not available to settle issues already pending before the court); see also Charlie Thomas Ford, Inc. v. A.C. | 2 | 2 |
K-Six Television, Inc. v. Santiagogreen2 sentences2002See K-Six Television, Inc. v. Santiago, 75 S.W.3d 91, 96 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2002, no pet., mandamus denied) (holding permission to file a late response may be reflected in trial court’s recital). 2002See K-Six Television, Inc. v. Santiago , 75 S.W.3d 91, 96 (Tex. App. C San Antonio 2002, no pet., mandamus denied) (holding permission to file a late response may be reflected in trial court’s recital). | 2 | 2 |
Benchmark Bank v. Crowdergreen2 sentences2002See Benchmark Bank v. Crowder, 919 S.W.2d 657, 663 (Tex.1996). 2002See Benchmark Bank v. Crowder , 919 S.W.2d 657, 663 (Tex. 1996). | 2 | 2 |
New York Underwriters Insurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.green2 sentences2024Dist., 131 S.W.3d 663, 670 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2004, no pet.) (“Having failed to receive into evidence the relevant facts regarding the circumstances surrounding the filing of the lawsuit, the trial court had no evidence before it to determine the motives and credibility of the person filing the allegedly groundless pleading or the relevant culpability of appellant or his attorneys.”); see also New York Underwriters, 856 S.W.2d at 205 (holding, “summary judgment is inappropriate for deciding the motives and credibility of the person signing the alleged groundless petition” and concluding 2002New York Underwriters , 856 S.W.2d at 205-06 . | 1 | 2 |
Alejandro v. Robstown Independent School Districtgreen1 sentence2024Dist., 131 S.W.3d 663, 670 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2004, no pet.) (“Having failed to receive into evidence the relevant facts regarding the circumstances surrounding the filing of the lawsuit, the trial court had no evidence before it to determine the motives and credibility of the person filing the allegedly groundless pleading or the relevant culpability of appellant or his attorneys.”); see also New York Underwriters, 856 S.W.2d at 205 (holding, “summary judgment is inappropriate for deciding the motives and credibility of the person signing the alleged groundless petition” and concluding | 1 | 1 |
Stroop v. Northern County Mutual Insurance Co.green1 sentence2021See id. | 1 | 1 |
Azbill v. DALLAS CTY. CHILD PROT. SERV.green1 sentence1998See Azbill v. Dallas County Child Protective Services, 860 S.W.2d 133 , 137 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1993, no writ) (interlocutory judgments and orders are merged into the final judgment whether the interlocutory judgments or orders are specifically named within the final judgment); McGrew v. Heard, 779 S.W.2d 455, 457-58 (Tex.App. —Houston [1st Dist.] 1989, no writ) (nonsuit order disposing of remaining claims made the judgment final). | 1 | 1 |
McGrew v. Heardgreen1 sentence1998See Azbill v. Dallas County Child Protective Services, 860 S.W.2d 133 , 137 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1993, no writ) (interlocutory judgments and orders are merged into the final judgment whether the interlocutory judgments or orders are specifically named within the final judgment); McGrew v. Heard, 779 S.W.2d 455, 457-58 (Tex.App. —Houston [1st Dist.] 1989, no writ) (nonsuit order disposing of remaining claims made the judgment final). | 1 | 1 |
Swilley v. Hughesgreen1 sentence1991Swilley v. Hughes, 488 S.W.2d 64, 67 (Tex.1972). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
TX Far West, Ltd. v. Texas Investments Management, Inc.
green
2 sentences2010TX Far W., Ltd. , 127 S.W.3d at 301 . (ii) Waiver of Medical Dispute Resolution We begin by addressing Crain’s assertion that summary judgment was improper because the evidence raised questions of fact regarding Hartford’s claim that Crain, by failing to file an MDR request within forty-five days of Hartford’s denial of reconsideration, had waived his right to administrative review of Hartford’s preauthorization denial. 2010TX Far W., Ltd., 127 S.W.3d at 301 . (ii) Waiver of Medical Dispute Resolution We begin by addressing Crain’s assertion that summary judgment was improper because the evidence raised questions of fact regarding Hartford’s claim that Crain, by failing to file an MDR request within forty-five days of Hartford’s denial of reconsideration, had waived his right to administrative review of Hartford’s preauthorization denial. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Estate of Padilla v. Charter Oaks Fire Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence1993Hartford relies on Capitol Aggregates, Inc., 408 S.W.2d 922 , and Estate of Padilla v. Charter Oaks Fire Insurance Co., 843 S.W.2d 196 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1992, writ denied), to support this claim. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Capitol Aggregates, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence1993Hartford relies on Capitol Aggregates, Inc., 408 S.W.2d 922 , and Estate of Padilla v. Charter Oaks Fire Insurance Co., 843 S.W.2d 196 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1992, writ denied), to support this claim. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Walker v. State
green
1 sentence1987The State contends the Legislature’s omission to provide specifically and expressly for a waiver of immunity, as to prejudgment interest, leaves unimpaired the State’s sovereign immunity as to Hartford’s claim for such interest, as exemplified in State v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Company, 289 S.W.2d 309 (Tex.Civ.App.1956, writ ref’d n.r.e.), and Walker v. State, 103 S.W.2d 404 (Tex.Civ.App.1937, no writ). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co.
green
1 sentence1987The State contends the Legislature’s omission to provide specifically and expressly for a waiver of immunity, as to prejudgment interest, leaves unimpaired the State’s sovereign immunity as to Hartford’s claim for such interest, as exemplified in State v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Company, 289 S.W.2d 309 (Tex.Civ.App.1956, writ ref’d n.r.e.), and Walker v. State, 103 S.W.2d 404 (Tex.Civ.App.1937, no writ). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking, Inc.
red
1 sentence1987We hold that it shall be calculated according to the statutory procedure directed in Cavnar, supra. 2 We order that the judgment be reformed accordingly and remand the cause to the trial court for that purpose. 1 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Douglass v. Panama, Inc.
green
1 sentence1975Dallas County v. Miller, 166 S.W.2d 922 (Tex.Comm.App.1942, adopted); Douglass v. Panama, 504 S.W.2d 776 (Tex.Sup.1974). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Dallas County v. Miller
green
1 sentence1975Dallas County v. Miller, 166 S.W.2d 922 (Tex.Comm.App.1942, adopted); Douglass v. Panama, 504 S.W.2d 776 (Tex.Sup.1974). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.