Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Majeed v. Randallgreen2 sentences2018See, e. g., Majeed v. Randall , 279 Ga. App. 679 , 680-681 (2), 632 S.E.2d 413 (2006) (an appellant must show error from the record, and this burden is not satisfied by mere assertions in the appellate brief). 2018See, e. g., Majeed v. Randall , 279 Ga. App. 679 , 680-681 (2), 632 S.E.2d 413 (2006) (an appellant must show error from the record, and this burden is not satisfied by mere assertions in the appellate brief). | 3 | 3 |
CHRYSLER GROUP LLC v. WALDENgreen2 sentences2025In order to demonstrate plain error based upon the admission of evidence, an appellant must show an error or defect that has not been “affirmatively waived” by the appellant, that is “clear or obvious,” and that “affected the appellant’s substantial rights” by “affect[ing] the outcome of the trial court proceedings”; if these three requirements are satisfied, we have the discretion to remedy the error but should do so only if the error “seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” (Citation omitted.) Chrysler Group, 303 Ga. at 370 (II) (B). 2021Our analysis does not end here, however, because the plain error provision of the Evidence Code “establishes that nothing in [OCGA § 24- 1-103] shall preclude a court from taking notice of plain errors affecting substantial rights although such errors were not brought to the attention of the court.” Chrysler Group v. Walden, 303 Ga. 358, 369 (II) (B) ( 812 SE2d 244 ) (2018).4 (c) In order to demonstrate plain error based upon the admission of evidence, an appellant must show an error or defect that has not been “affirmatively waived” by the appellant, that is “clear or obvious,” and that “affe | 2 | 2 |
Gates v. Stategreen2 sentences2020To establish plain error, an appellant must show an error or defect that he has not “affirmatively waived,” that is “clear or obvious,” and that “affected [his] substantial rights” by “affect[ing] the outcome of the trial court proceedings”; if these three requirements are satisfied, we have the discretion to remedy the error but should do so only if the error “seriously affects the fairness, integrity or public reputation of the judicial proceedings.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Gates v. State, 298 Ga. 324, 327 (3) ( 781 SE2d 772 ) (2016). 2020To establish plain error, an appellant must show an error or defect that he has not “affirmatively waived,” that is “clear or obvious,” and that “affected [his] substantial rights” by “affect[ing] the outcome of the trial court proceedings”; if these three requirements are satisfied, we have the discretion to remedy the error but should do so only if the error “seriously affects the fairness, integrity or public reputation of the judicial proceedings.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Gates v. State, 298 Ga. 324, 327 (3) ( 781 SE2d 772 ) (2016). | 1 | 2 |
Shamsai v. Coordinated Properties, Inc.green2 sentences2006See West v. Austin, 274 Ga. App. 729, 729-730 ( 618 SE2d 662 ) (2005). 6 See Folds v. Barber, 279 Ga. App. 671 ( 632 SE2d 403 ) (2006). 7 See Court of Appeals Rule 7 (appeal may be dismissed for failure to comply with Court rules); Majeed v. Randall, 279 Ga. App. 679, 680-681 (2) ( 632 SE2d 413 ) (2006) (an appellant must show error from the record, and this burden is not satisfied by mere assertions in the appellate brief). 8 See Shamsai v. Coordinated Properties, 259 Ga. App. 438, 440 (3) ( 576 SE2d 901 ) (2003). 9 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Id. 10 See id. 11 See Court of Appeals Ru 2006See West v. Austin, 274 Ga. App. 729, 729-730 ( 618 SE2d 662 ) (2005). 6 See Folds v. Barber, 279 Ga. App. 671 ( 632 SE2d 403 ) (2006). 7 See Court of Appeals Rule 7 (appeal may be dismissed for failure to comply with Court rules); Majeed v. Randall, 279 Ga. App. 679, 680-681 (2) ( 632 SE2d 413 ) (2006) (an appellant must show error from the record, and this burden is not satisfied by mere assertions in the appellate brief). 8 See Shamsai v. Coordinated Properties, 259 Ga. App. 438, 440 (3) ( 576 SE2d 901 ) (2003). 9 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Id. 10 See id. 11 See Court of Appeals Ru | 1 | 1 |
Folds v. Barbergreen2 sentences2006See West v. Austin, 274 Ga. App. 729, 729-730 ( 618 SE2d 662 ) (2005). 6 See Folds v. Barber, 279 Ga. App. 671 ( 632 SE2d 403 ) (2006). 7 See Court of Appeals Rule 7 (appeal may be dismissed for failure to comply with Court rules); Majeed v. Randall, 279 Ga. App. 679, 680-681 (2) ( 632 SE2d 413 ) (2006) (an appellant must show error from the record, and this burden is not satisfied by mere assertions in the appellate brief). 8 See Shamsai v. Coordinated Properties, 259 Ga. App. 438, 440 (3) ( 576 SE2d 901 ) (2003). 9 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Id. 10 See id. 11 See Court of Appeals Ru 2006See West v. Austin, 274 Ga. App. 729, 729-730 ( 618 SE2d 662 ) (2005). 6 See Folds v. Barber, 279 Ga. App. 671 ( 632 SE2d 403 ) (2006). 7 See Court of Appeals Rule 7 (appeal may be dismissed for failure to comply with Court rules); Majeed v. Randall, 279 Ga. App. 679, 680-681 (2) ( 632 SE2d 413 ) (2006) (an appellant must show error from the record, and this burden is not satisfied by mere assertions in the appellate brief). 8 See Shamsai v. Coordinated Properties, 259 Ga. App. 438, 440 (3) ( 576 SE2d 901 ) (2003). 9 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Id. 10 See id. 11 See Court of Appeals Ru | 1 | 1 |
Kim v. Tex Financial Corp.green2 sentences2006See West v. Austin, 274 Ga. App. 729, 729-730 ( 618 SE2d 662 ) (2005). 6 See Folds v. Barber, 279 Ga. App. 671 ( 632 SE2d 403 ) (2006). 7 See Court of Appeals Rule 7 (appeal may be dismissed for failure to comply with Court rules); Majeed v. Randall, 279 Ga. App. 679, 680-681 (2) ( 632 SE2d 413 ) (2006) (an appellant must show error from the record, and this burden is not satisfied by mere assertions in the appellate brief). 8 See Shamsai v. Coordinated Properties, 259 Ga. App. 438, 440 (3) ( 576 SE2d 901 ) (2003). 9 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Id. 10 See id. 11 See Court of Appeals Ru 2006See West v. Austin, 274 Ga. App. 729, 729-730 ( 618 SE2d 662 ) (2005). 6 See Folds v. Barber, 279 Ga. App. 671 ( 632 SE2d 403 ) (2006). 7 See Court of Appeals Rule 7 (appeal may be dismissed for failure to comply with Court rules); Majeed v. Randall, 279 Ga. App. 679, 680-681 (2) ( 632 SE2d 413 ) (2006) (an appellant must show error from the record, and this burden is not satisfied by mere assertions in the appellate brief). 8 See Shamsai v. Coordinated Properties, 259 Ga. App. 438, 440 (3) ( 576 SE2d 901 ) (2003). 9 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Id. 10 See id. 11 See Court of Appeals Ru | 1 | 1 |
West v. Austingreen2 sentences2006See West v. Austin, 274 Ga. App. 729, 729-730 ( 618 SE2d 662 ) (2005). 6 See Folds v. Barber, 279 Ga. App. 671 ( 632 SE2d 403 ) (2006). 7 See Court of Appeals Rule 7 (appeal may be dismissed for failure to comply with Court rules); Majeed v. Randall, 279 Ga. App. 679, 680-681 (2) ( 632 SE2d 413 ) (2006) (an appellant must show error from the record, and this burden is not satisfied by mere assertions in the appellate brief). 8 See Shamsai v. Coordinated Properties, 259 Ga. App. 438, 440 (3) ( 576 SE2d 901 ) (2003). 9 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Id. 10 See id. 11 See Court of Appeals Ru 2006See West v. Austin, 274 Ga. App. 729, 729-730 ( 618 SE2d 662 ) (2005). 6 See Folds v. Barber, 279 Ga. App. 671 ( 632 SE2d 403 ) (2006). 7 See Court of Appeals Rule 7 (appeal may be dismissed for failure to comply with Court rules); Majeed v. Randall, 279 Ga. App. 679, 680-681 (2) ( 632 SE2d 413 ) (2006) (an appellant must show error from the record, and this burden is not satisfied by mere assertions in the appellate brief). 8 See Shamsai v. Coordinated Properties, 259 Ga. App. 438, 440 (3) ( 576 SE2d 901 ) (2003). 9 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Id. 10 See id. 11 See Court of Appeals Ru | 1 | 1 |
Mariner Healthcare, Inc. v. Fostergreen2 sentences2006See West v. Austin, 274 Ga. App. 729, 729-730 ( 618 SE2d 662 ) (2005). 6 See Folds v. Barber, 279 Ga. App. 671 ( 632 SE2d 403 ) (2006). 7 See Court of Appeals Rule 7 (appeal may be dismissed for failure to comply with Court rules); Majeed v. Randall, 279 Ga. App. 679, 680-681 (2) ( 632 SE2d 413 ) (2006) (an appellant must show error from the record, and this burden is not satisfied by mere assertions in the appellate brief). 8 See Shamsai v. Coordinated Properties, 259 Ga. App. 438, 440 (3) ( 576 SE2d 901 ) (2003). 9 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Id. 10 See id. 11 See Court of Appeals Ru 2006See West v. Austin, 274 Ga. App. 729, 729-730 ( 618 SE2d 662 ) (2005). 6 See Folds v. Barber, 279 Ga. App. 671 ( 632 SE2d 403 ) (2006). 7 See Court of Appeals Rule 7 (appeal may be dismissed for failure to comply with Court rules); Majeed v. Randall, 279 Ga. App. 679, 680-681 (2) ( 632 SE2d 413 ) (2006) (an appellant must show error from the record, and this burden is not satisfied by mere assertions in the appellate brief). 8 See Shamsai v. Coordinated Properties, 259 Ga. App. 438, 440 (3) ( 576 SE2d 901 ) (2003). 9 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Id. 10 See id. 11 See Court of Appeals Ru | 1 | 1 |
Serchion v. Stategreen2 sentences2004Serchion v. State of Ga., 230 Ga. App. 336, 337 (1) ( 496 SE2d 333 ) (1998). 2004Serchion v. State of Ga., 230 Ga. App. 336, 337 (1) ( 496 SE2d 333 ) (1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Chrysler Grp. LLC v. Walden
green
1 sentence2021Our analysis does not end here, however, because the plain error provision of the Evidence Code “establishes that nothing in [OCGA § 24- 1-103] shall preclude a court from taking notice of plain errors affecting substantial rights although such errors were not brought to the attention of the court.” Chrysler Group v. Walden, 303 Ga. 358, 369 (II) (B) ( 812 SE2d 244 ) (2018).4 (c) In order to demonstrate plain error based upon the admission of evidence, an appellant must show an error or defect that has not been “affirmatively waived” by the appellant, that is “clear or obvious,” and that “affe | 1 | 2021–2021 |
United States v. Olano
green
2 sentences2018Federal courts sometimes explain that plain error review is derived from Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52 (b), which codified the federal common law in 1944, and provides that “[a] plain error that affects substantial rights may be considered even though it was not brought to the court’s attention.” See United States v. Olano, 507 U. S. 725 ( 113 SCt 1770 , 123 LE2d 508) (1993). 2018Federal courts sometimes explain that plain error review is derived from Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52 (b), which codified the federal common law in 1944, and provides that “[a] plain error that affects substantial rights may be considered even though it was not brought to the court’s attention.” See United States v. Olano, 507 U. S. 725 ( 113 SCt 1770 , 123 LE2d 508) (1993). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.