Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nusser v. Stategreen2 sentences2009“As a general rule, any delay approaching a year raises a threshold presumption of prejudice.” Nusser v. State, 275 Ga. App. 896, 897 ( 622 SE2d 105 ) (2005). 2009“As a general rule, any delay approaching a year raises a threshold presumption of prejudice.” Nusser v. State, 275 Ga. App. 896, 897 ( 622 SE2d 105 ) (2005). | 2 | 4 |
Disharoon v. Stategreen2 sentences2010And “any delay approaching a year raises a threshold presumption of prejudice.” (Citation omitted.) Id. at 3 (1) (a). 2009“Generally, any delay approaching a year raises a threshold presumption of prejudice.” Id. at 3 (1) (a), citing Doggett v. United States, 505 U. S. 647, 652 (II), n. 1 (112 SC 2686, 120 LE2d 520) (1992). | 2 | 3 |
Doggett v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2009“Generally, any delay approaching a year raises a threshold presumption of prejudice.” Id. at 3 (1) (a), citing Doggett v. United States, 505 U. S. 647, 652 (II), n. 1 (112 SC 2686, 120 LE2d 520) (1992). 2005Doggett v. United States, 505 U. S. 647, 652 (II), n. 1 (112 SC 2686, 120 LE2d 520) (1992); State v. Bazemore, 249 Ga. App. 584, 585 (1) (a) ( 549 SE2d 426 ) (2001). | 2 | 2 |
Lynch v. Stategreen2 sentences2010And any delay approaching a year raises a threshold presumption of prejudice.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Lynch v. State, 300 Ga. App. 723, 724 ( 686 SE2d 268 ) (2009). b. 2010And any delay approaching a year raises a threshold presumption of prejudice.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Lynch v. State, 300 Ga. App. 723, 724 ( 686 SE2d 268 ) (2009). b. | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Stategreen2 sentences2007Compare Henry, supra at 527, 530 (1) (c) (statutory speedy trial demand remained in effect following remittitur from Supreme Court, which affirmed trial court’s denial of motion for discharge and acquittal; although appeal involved defendant’s statutory speedy trial demand, the issue was whether defendant had been denied equal protection, not whether defendant had waived his demand). 6 See Mann v. State, 259 Ga. App. 553, 554 (2) ( 578 SE2d 238 ) (2003) ("Relitigation of issues previously decided on appeal is barred by res judicata.”). 7 Nusser v. State, 275 Ga. App. 896, 897 ( 622 SE2d 105 ) 2007Compare Henry, supra at 527, 530 (1) (c) (statutory speedy trial demand remained in effect following remittitur from Supreme Court, which affirmed trial court’s denial of motion for discharge and acquittal; although appeal involved defendant’s statutory speedy trial demand, the issue was whether defendant had been denied equal protection, not whether defendant had waived his demand). 6 See Mann v. State, 259 Ga. App. 553, 554 (2) ( 578 SE2d 238 ) (2003) ("Relitigation of issues previously decided on appeal is barred by res judicata.”). 7 Nusser v. State, 275 Ga. App. 896, 897 ( 622 SE2d 105 ) | 1 | 1 |
Mann v. Stategreen2 sentences2007Compare Henry, supra at 527, 530 (1) (c) (statutory speedy trial demand remained in effect following remittitur from Supreme Court, which affirmed trial court’s denial of motion for discharge and acquittal; although appeal involved defendant’s statutory speedy trial demand, the issue was whether defendant had been denied equal protection, not whether defendant had waived his demand). 6 See Mann v. State, 259 Ga. App. 553, 554 (2) ( 578 SE2d 238 ) (2003) ("Relitigation of issues previously decided on appeal is barred by res judicata.”). 7 Nusser v. State, 275 Ga. App. 896, 897 ( 622 SE2d 105 ) 2007Compare Henry, supra at 527, 530 (1) (c) (statutory speedy trial demand remained in effect following remittitur from Supreme Court, which affirmed trial court’s denial of motion for discharge and acquittal; although appeal involved defendant’s statutory speedy trial demand, the issue was whether defendant had been denied equal protection, not whether defendant had waived his demand). 6 See Mann v. State, 259 Ga. App. 553, 554 (2) ( 578 SE2d 238 ) (2003) ("Relitigation of issues previously decided on appeal is barred by res judicata.”). 7 Nusser v. State, 275 Ga. App. 896, 897 ( 622 SE2d 105 ) | 1 | 1 |
Hardeman v. Stategreen2 sentences2007Compare Henry, supra at 527, 530 (1) (c) (statutory speedy trial demand remained in effect following remittitur from Supreme Court, which affirmed trial court’s denial of motion for discharge and acquittal; although appeal involved defendant’s statutory speedy trial demand, the issue was whether defendant had been denied equal protection, not whether defendant had waived his demand). 6 See Mann v. State, 259 Ga. App. 553, 554 (2) ( 578 SE2d 238 ) (2003) ("Relitigation of issues previously decided on appeal is barred by res judicata.”). 7 Nusser v. State, 275 Ga. App. 896, 897 ( 622 SE2d 105 ) 2007Compare Henry, supra at 527, 530 (1) (c) (statutory speedy trial demand remained in effect following remittitur from Supreme Court, which affirmed trial court’s denial of motion for discharge and acquittal; although appeal involved defendant’s statutory speedy trial demand, the issue was whether defendant had been denied equal protection, not whether defendant had waived his demand). 6 See Mann v. State, 259 Ga. App. 553, 554 (2) ( 578 SE2d 238 ) (2003) ("Relitigation of issues previously decided on appeal is barred by res judicata.”). 7 Nusser v. State, 275 Ga. App. 896, 897 ( 622 SE2d 105 ) | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Stategreen2 sentences2007Compare Henry, supra at 527, 530 (1) (c) (statutory speedy trial demand remained in effect following remittitur from Supreme Court, which affirmed trial court’s denial of motion for discharge and acquittal; although appeal involved defendant’s statutory speedy trial demand, the issue was whether defendant had been denied equal protection, not whether defendant had waived his demand). 6 See Mann v. State, 259 Ga. App. 553, 554 (2) ( 578 SE2d 238 ) (2003) ("Relitigation of issues previously decided on appeal is barred by res judicata.”). 7 Nusser v. State, 275 Ga. App. 896, 897 ( 622 SE2d 105 ) 2007Compare Henry, supra at 527, 530 (1) (c) (statutory speedy trial demand remained in effect following remittitur from Supreme Court, which affirmed trial court’s denial of motion for discharge and acquittal; although appeal involved defendant’s statutory speedy trial demand, the issue was whether defendant had been denied equal protection, not whether defendant had waived his demand). 6 See Mann v. State, 259 Ga. App. 553, 554 (2) ( 578 SE2d 238 ) (2003) ("Relitigation of issues previously decided on appeal is barred by res judicata.”). 7 Nusser v. State, 275 Ga. App. 896, 897 ( 622 SE2d 105 ) | 1 | 1 |
Nelloms v. Stategreen2 sentences2007Compare Henry, supra at 527, 530 (1) (c) (statutory speedy trial demand remained in effect following remittitur from Supreme Court, which affirmed trial court’s denial of motion for discharge and acquittal; although appeal involved defendant’s statutory speedy trial demand, the issue was whether defendant had been denied equal protection, not whether defendant had waived his demand). 6 See Mann v. State, 259 Ga. App. 553, 554 (2) ( 578 SE2d 238 ) (2003) ("Relitigation of issues previously decided on appeal is barred by res judicata.”). 7 Nusser v. State, 275 Ga. App. 896, 897 ( 622 SE2d 105 ) 2007Compare Henry, supra at 527, 530 (1) (c) (statutory speedy trial demand remained in effect following remittitur from Supreme Court, which affirmed trial court’s denial of motion for discharge and acquittal; although appeal involved defendant’s statutory speedy trial demand, the issue was whether defendant had been denied equal protection, not whether defendant had waived his demand). 6 See Mann v. State, 259 Ga. App. 553, 554 (2) ( 578 SE2d 238 ) (2003) ("Relitigation of issues previously decided on appeal is barred by res judicata.”). 7 Nusser v. State, 275 Ga. App. 896, 897 ( 622 SE2d 105 ) | 1 | 1 |
Henry v. Jamesgreen1 sentence2007Compare Henry, supra at 527, 530 (1) (c) (statutory speedy trial demand remained in effect following remittitur from Supreme Court, which affirmed trial court’s denial of motion for discharge and acquittal; although appeal involved defendant’s statutory speedy trial demand, the issue was whether defendant had been denied equal protection, not whether defendant had waived his demand). 6 See Mann v. State, 259 Ga. App. 553, 554 (2) ( 578 SE2d 238 ) (2003) ("Relitigation of issues previously decided on appeal is barred by res judicata.”). 7 Nusser v. State, 275 Ga. App. 896, 897 ( 622 SE2d 105 ) | 1 | 1 |
Brannen v. Stategreen2 sentences2007Compare Henry, supra at 527, 530 (1) (c) (statutory speedy trial demand remained in effect following remittitur from Supreme Court, which affirmed trial court’s denial of motion for discharge and acquittal; although appeal involved defendant’s statutory speedy trial demand, the issue was whether defendant had been denied equal protection, not whether defendant had waived his demand). 6 See Mann v. State, 259 Ga. App. 553, 554 (2) ( 578 SE2d 238 ) (2003) ("Relitigation of issues previously decided on appeal is barred by res judicata.”). 7 Nusser v. State, 275 Ga. App. 896, 897 ( 622 SE2d 105 ) 2007Compare Henry, supra at 527, 530 (1) (c) (statutory speedy trial demand remained in effect following remittitur from Supreme Court, which affirmed trial court’s denial of motion for discharge and acquittal; although appeal involved defendant’s statutory speedy trial demand, the issue was whether defendant had been denied equal protection, not whether defendant had waived his demand). 6 See Mann v. State, 259 Ga. App. 553, 554 (2) ( 578 SE2d 238 ) (2003) ("Relitigation of issues previously decided on appeal is barred by res judicata.”). 7 Nusser v. State, 275 Ga. App. 896, 897 ( 622 SE2d 105 ) | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bazemoregreen2 sentences2005Doggett v. United States, 505 U. S. 647, 652 (II), n. 1 (112 SC 2686, 120 LE2d 520) (1992); State v. Bazemore, 249 Ga. App. 584, 585 (1) (a) ( 549 SE2d 426 ) (2001). 2005Doggett v. United States, 505 U. S. 647, 652 (II), n. 1 (112 SC 2686, 120 LE2d 520) (1992); State v. Bazemore, 249 Ga. App. 584, 585 (1) (a) ( 549 SE2d 426 ) (2001). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.