Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 2009–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Rolland Eugene Knopfgreen1 sentence2014See id. (recognizing the Board failed to prove an attorney’s conduct violated this rule when it would be speculative to conclude the attorney’s actions were solely for his convenience or for an unreasonable purpose). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Casey
green
2 sentences2019Id. at 60 . 2019Id. at 60 . | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. Thomas E. Lustgraaf
green
2 sentences2015We found the lawyer’s conduct violated rule 32:8.4(b) prohibiting the “commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer.” Id. at 299 . 2015We found the lawyer’s conduct violated rule 32:8.4(b) prohibiting the “commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer.” Id. at 299 . | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Ramey
green
2 sentences2009This conduct violated rule 32:1.15(d) (failing to promptly deliver to the client any property that the client is entitled to receive), DR 1-102(A)(5) (engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice), DR 1-102(A)(6) (engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on the fitness to practice law), and DR 7-101(A)(1). 3 Ramey, 746 N.W.2d at 55-56 , Earley, 729 N.W.2d at 442 . 2009This conduct violated rule 32:1.15(d) (failing to promptly deliver to the client any property that the client is entitled to receive), DR 1–102(A)(5) (engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice), DR 1–102(A)(6) (engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on the fitness to practice law), and DR 7–101(A)(1). 3 Ramey, 746 N.W.2d at 55–56; Earley, 729 N.W.2d at 442 . | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Earley
green
2 sentences2009Ramey, 746 N.W.2d at 54-56 ; Earley, 729 N.W.2d at 442-43 . 2009This conduct violated rule 32:1.15(d) (failing to promptly deliver to the client any property that the client is entitled to receive), DR 1–102(A)(5) (engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice), DR 1–102(A)(6) (engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on the fitness to practice law), and DR 7–101(A)(1). 3 Ramey, 746 N.W.2d at 55–56; Earley, 729 N.W.2d at 442 . | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Furlong
green
1 sentence2024Id. at 713 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Kathryn S. Barnhill
green
1 sentence2019Id. at 423 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
IOWA SUP. CT. ATTY. DISC. BD. v. Gottschalk
green
1 sentence2009Gottschalk, 729 N.W.2d at 820 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.