Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ryan v. Arnesongreen2 sentences2015Id.; see also Ryan v. Arneson, 422 N.W.2d 491, 495 (Iowa 1988) (clarifying the first prong of the Cullen test by interpreting Iowa Rule of Evidence (5).606(b) to allow statements regarding extraneous prejudicial information or outside influence that was brought to bear on the jury, but excluding evidence of internal deliberations of the jury). 2015Id.; see also Ryan v. Arneson, 422 N.W.2d 491, 495 (Iowa 1988) (clarifying the first prong of the Cullen test by interpreting Iowa Rule of Evidence (5).606(b) to allow statements regarding extraneous prejudicial information or outside influence that was brought to bear on the jury, but excluding evidence of internal deliberations of the jury). | 5 | 5 |
State v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2015See Johnson, 445 N.W.2d at 340–42; Cuevas, 288 N.W.2d at 534–35. 2015See Johnson, 445 N.W.2d at 340–42; Cuevas, 288 N.W.2d at 534–35. | 3 | 3 |
State of Iowa v. Tyler James Webstergreen2 sentences2018See, e.g. , Webster , 865 N.W.2d at 235-36 (applying Cullen standard to juror's conversation with a third-party); State v. Anderson , 448 N.W.2d 32 , 34-35 (Iowa 1989) (citing Carey for the proposition that "conduct by an outsider, improperly influencing a juror, can be grounds for a new trial" but applying the Cullen prejudice test). 2018See, e.g., Webster, 865 N.W.2d at 235-36 (applying Cullen standard to juror’s conversation with a third-party); State v. Anderson, 448 N.W.2d 32, 34-35 (Iowa 1989) (citing Carey for the proposition that “conduct by an outsider, improperly influencing a juror, can be grounds for a new trial” but applying the Cullen prejudice test). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Saulsgreen2 sentences2022See Sauls, 391 N.W.2d at 242 (noting that affidavits can be used to satisfy the first element of the Cullen test). 2022See Sauls, 391 N.W.2d at 242 (noting that affidavits can be used to satisfy the first element of the Cullen test). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Andersongreen2 sentences2018See, e.g. , Webster , 865 N.W.2d at 235-36 (applying Cullen standard to juror's conversation with a third-party); State v. Anderson , 448 N.W.2d 32 , 34-35 (Iowa 1989) (citing Carey for the proposition that "conduct by an outsider, improperly influencing a juror, can be grounds for a new trial" but applying the Cullen prejudice test). 2018See, e.g., Webster, 865 N.W.2d at 235-36 (applying Cullen standard to juror’s conversation with a third-party); State v. Anderson, 448 N.W.2d 32, 34-35 (Iowa 1989) (citing Carey for the proposition that “conduct by an outsider, improperly influencing a juror, can be grounds for a new trial” but applying the Cullen prejudice test). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Cullengreen2 sentences2015State v. Webster, ___ N.W.2d. ___, ___, 2015 WL 3814823 , at *8 (Iowa 2015) (quoting State v. Cullen, 357 N.W.2d 24, 27 (Iowa 1984)); see also Ryan v. Arneson, 422 N.W.2d 491 (Iowa 1988) (clarifying the first prong of the Cullen test by interpreting Iowa Rule of Evidence [5].606(b) to allow statements regarding extraneous prejucicial information or outside influence that was brought to bear 6 on the jury, but excluding evidence of internal deliberations of the jury). 2015State v. Webster, ___ N.W.2d. ___, ___, 2015 WL 3814823 , at *8 (Iowa 2015) (quoting State v. Cullen, 357 N.W.2d 24, 27 (Iowa 1984)); see also Ryan v. Arneson, 422 N.W.2d 491 (Iowa 1988) (clarifying the first prong of the Cullen test by interpreting Iowa Rule of Evidence [5].606(b) to allow statements regarding extraneous prejucicial information or outside influence that was brought to bear 6 on the jury, but excluding evidence of internal deliberations of the jury). | 1 | 1 |
Long v. Gilchristgreen2 sentences1986In Long v. Gilchrist, 251 Iowa 1294, 1299 , 105 N.W.2d 82, 85 (1960), an action involving an automobile collision, the court ordered the jury to be taken to view the scene of the accident. 1986In Long v. Gilchrist, 251 Iowa 1294, 1299 , 105 N.W.2d 82, 85 (1960), an action involving an automobile collision, the court ordered the jury to be taken to view the scene of the accident. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Cuevas
green
2 sentences2015See Johnson, 445 N.W.2d at 340–42; Cuevas, 288 N.W.2d at 534–35. 2015See Johnson, 445 N.W.2d at 340–42; Cuevas, 288 N.W.2d at 534–35. | 3 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.