Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2022 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ceasergreen2 sentences2021Generally, “[w]e apply the same analysis in considering the state equal protection claim as we do in considering the federal equal protection claim.” In re Morrow, 616 N.W.2d 544, 547 (Iowa 2000) (en banc) (quoting 7 State v. Ceaser, 585 N.W.2d 192, 196 (Iowa 1998), overruled on other grounds by State v. Bruegger, 773 N.W.2d 862 (Iowa 2009)). 2021Generally, “[w]e apply the same analysis in considering the state equal protection claim as we do in considering the federal equal protection claim.” In re Morrow, 616 N.W.2d 544, 547 (Iowa 2000) (en banc) (quoting 7 State v. Ceaser, 585 N.W.2d 192, 196 (Iowa 1998), overruled on other grounds by State v. Bruegger, 773 N.W.2d 862 (Iowa 2009)). | 3 | 3 |
Varnum v. Briengreen2 sentences2014Defender, 791 N.W.2d 69 , 76 n.3 (Iowa 2010) (“Even in cases where no substantive distinction has been advanced by the parties [between Iowa and federal 54 constitutional law], we reserve the right to apply the principles differently.”); State v. Bruegger, 773 N.W.2d 862, 883 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]e do not necessarily apply the federal standards in the same way as the United States Supreme Court.”); Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862 , 878 n.6 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]e have jealously guarded our right to employ a different analytical framework under the state equal protection clause as well as to independent 2014Defender, 791 N.W.2d 69 , 76 n.3 (Iowa 2010) (“Even in cases where no substantive distinction has been advanced by the parties [between Iowa and federal 54 constitutional law], we reserve the right to apply the principles differently.”); State v. Bruegger, 773 N.W.2d 862, 883 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]e do not necessarily apply the federal standards in the same way as the United States Supreme Court.”); Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862 , 878 n.6 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]e have jealously guarded our right to employ a different analytical framework under the state equal protection clause as well as to independent | 2 | 6 |
State v. Brueggergreen2 sentences2021Generally, “[w]e apply the same analysis in considering the state equal protection claim as we do in considering the federal equal protection claim.” In re Morrow, 616 N.W.2d 544, 547 (Iowa 2000) (en banc) (quoting 7 State v. Ceaser, 585 N.W.2d 192, 196 (Iowa 1998), overruled on other grounds by State v. Bruegger, 773 N.W.2d 862 (Iowa 2009)). 2021Generally, “[w]e apply the same analysis in considering the state equal protection claim as we do in considering the federal equal protection claim.” In re Morrow, 616 N.W.2d 544, 547 (Iowa 2000) (en banc) (quoting 7 State v. Ceaser, 585 N.W.2d 192, 196 (Iowa 1998), overruled on other grounds by State v. Bruegger, 773 N.W.2d 862 (Iowa 2009)). | 2 | 4 |
In Re Morrowgreen2 sentences2021Generally, “[w]e apply the same analysis in considering the state equal protection claim as we do in considering the federal equal protection claim.” In re Morrow, 616 N.W.2d 544, 547 (Iowa 2000) (en banc) (quoting 7 State v. Ceaser, 585 N.W.2d 192, 196 (Iowa 1998), overruled on other grounds by State v. Bruegger, 773 N.W.2d 862 (Iowa 2009)). 2021Generally, “[w]e apply the same analysis in considering the state equal protection claim as we do in considering the federal equal protection claim.” In re Morrow, 616 N.W.2d 544, 547 (Iowa 2000) (en banc) (quoting 7 State v. Ceaser, 585 N.W.2d 192, 196 (Iowa 1998), overruled on other grounds by State v. Bruegger, 773 N.W.2d 862 (Iowa 2009)). | 2 | 2 |
In Re SAJBgreen2 sentences2014Defender, 791 N.W.2d 69 , 76 n.3 (Iowa 2010) (“Even in cases where no substantive distinction has been advanced by the parties [between Iowa and federal 54 constitutional law], we reserve the right to apply the principles differently.”); State v. Bruegger, 773 N.W.2d 862, 883 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]e do not necessarily apply the federal standards in the same way as the United States Supreme Court.”); Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862 , 878 n.6 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]e have jealously guarded our right to employ a different analytical framework under the state equal protection clause as well as to independent 2014Defender, 791 N.W.2d 69 , 76 n.3 (Iowa 2010) (“Even in cases where no substantive distinction has been advanced by the parties [between Iowa and federal 54 constitutional law], we reserve the right to apply the principles differently.”); State v. Bruegger, 773 N.W.2d 862, 883 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]e do not necessarily apply the federal standards in the same way as the United States Supreme Court.”); Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862 , 878 n.6 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]e have jealously guarded our right to employ a different analytical framework under the state equal protection clause as well as to independent | 2 | 2 |
Kent A. Simmons Vs. State Public Defendergreen2 sentences2014Defender, 791 N.W.2d 69 , 76 n.3 (Iowa 2010) (“Even in cases where no substantive distinction has been advanced by the parties [between Iowa and federal 54 constitutional law], we reserve the right to apply the principles differently.”); State v. Bruegger, 773 N.W.2d 862, 883 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]e do not necessarily apply the federal standards in the same way as the United States Supreme Court.”); Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862 , 878 n.6 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]e have jealously guarded our right to employ a different analytical framework under the state equal protection clause as well as to independent 2014Defender, 791 N.W.2d 69 , 76 n.3 (Iowa 2010) (“Even in cases where no substantive distinction has been advanced by the parties [between Iowa and federal 54 constitutional law], we reserve the right to apply the principles differently.”); State v. Bruegger, 773 N.W.2d 862, 883 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]e do not necessarily apply the federal standards in the same way as the United States Supreme Court.”); Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862 , 878 n.6 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]e have jealously guarded our right to employ a different analytical framework under the state equal protection clause as well as to independent | 2 | 2 |
State of Iowa v. Randall Lee Palsgreen2 sentences2014In those cases, this court instructed: 8 “We may construe the Iowa Constitution differently than its federal counterpart, despite the provisions containing nearly identical language and being structured generally with the same scope, import, and purpose.” State v. Kooima, 833 N.W.2d 202, 206 (Iowa 2013); see State v. Pals, 805 N.W.2d 767, 771-72, 781-83 (Iowa 2011) (noting Iowa’s more stringent application of state constitutional provisions than federal caselaw applying nearly identical federal counterparts); Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862 , 879 n.6 (Iowa 2009) (observing “we have jealously g 2013See State v. Pals, 805 N.W.2d 767, 771-72, 781-83 (Iowa 2011) (noting our more stringent application of state constitutional provisions than federal caselaw applying nearly identical federal counterparts); Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862 , 879 n. 6 (Iowa 2009) (observing “we have jealously guarded our right to ‘employ a different analytical framework’ under the state equal protection clause as well as to independently apply federally formulated principles” (citations omitted)). | 2 | 2 |
Racing Ass'n of Central Iowa v. Fitzgeraldgreen2 sentences2014Iowa v. Fitzgerald, 675 N.W.2d 1 , 6–7 (Iowa 2004) (“[T]his court’s independent application of the rational basis test might result in a dissimilar outcome from that reached by the Supreme Court in considering the federal constitutional claim.”). 2014Iowa v. Fitzgerald, 675 N.W.2d 1 , 6–7 (Iowa 2004) (“[T]his court’s independent application of the rational basis test might result in a dissimilar outcome from that reached by the Supreme Court in considering the federal constitutional claim.”). | 2 | 2 |
Bierkamp v. Rogersgreen1 sentence2022See Bierkamp v. Rogers, 293 N.W.2d 577, 581 (Iowa 1980) (discussing article I, section 6 of the Iowa Constitution). | 1 | 1 |
State of Iowa v. Leon Kooimagreen1 sentence2014In those cases, this court instructed: 8 “We may construe the Iowa Constitution differently than its federal counterpart, despite the provisions containing nearly identical language and being structured generally with the same scope, import, and purpose.” State v. Kooima, 833 N.W.2d 202, 206 (Iowa 2013); see State v. Pals, 805 N.W.2d 767, 771-72, 781-83 (Iowa 2011) (noting Iowa’s more stringent application of state constitutional provisions than federal caselaw applying nearly identical federal counterparts); Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862 , 879 n.6 (Iowa 2009) (observing “we have jealously g | 1 | 1 |
State of Iowa v. Isaac Andrew Baldon IIIgreen1 sentence2014In those cases, this court instructed: 8 “We may construe the Iowa Constitution differently than its federal counterpart, despite the provisions containing nearly identical language and being structured generally with the same scope, import, and purpose.” State v. Kooima, 833 N.W.2d 202, 206 (Iowa 2013); see State v. Pals, 805 N.W.2d 767, 771-72, 781-83 (Iowa 2011) (noting Iowa’s more stringent application of state constitutional provisions than federal caselaw applying nearly identical federal counterparts); Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862 , 879 n.6 (Iowa 2009) (observing “we have jealously g | 1 | 1 |
City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.green2 sentences2000See City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., 473 U.S. 432, 439 , 105 S.Ct. 3249, 3254 , 87 L.Ed.2d 313, 320 (1985); Ceaser, 585 N.W.2d at 196 . 2000See City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., 473 U.S. 432, 439 , 105 S.Ct. 3249, 3254 , 87 L.Ed.2d 313, 320 (1985); Ceaser, 585 N.W.2d at 196 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bellgreen2 sentences1998See State v. Bell, 572 N.W.2d 910, 911 (Iowa 1997). 1. 1998See State v. Bell, 572 N.W.2d 910, 911 (Iowa 1997). 1. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.