Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2024 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bradbury v. IDAHO JUDICIAL COUNCILgreen2 sentences2023“Whether it is necessary for a judicial officer to disqualify himself in a given case is left to the sound discretion of the judicial officer himself.” Zylstra v. State, 157 Idaho 457, 460 , 337 P.3d 616, 619 (2017) (quoting Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial Council, 149 Idaho 107, 113 , 233 P.3d 38, 44 (2009)). 2023“Whether it is necessary for a judicial officer to disqualify himself in a given case is left to the sound discretion of the judicial officer himself.” Zylstra v. State, 157 Idaho 457, 460 , 337 P.3d 616, 619 (2017) (quoting Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial Council, 149 Idaho 107, 113 , 233 P.3d 38, 44 (2009)). | 3 | 3 |
Zylstra v. Stategreen2 sentences2023“Whether it is necessary for a judicial officer to disqualify himself in a given case is left to the sound discretion of the judicial officer himself.” Zylstra v. State, 157 Idaho 457, 460 , 337 P.3d 616, 619 (2017) (quoting Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial Council, 149 Idaho 107, 113 , 233 P.3d 38, 44 (2009)). 2023“Whether it is necessary for a judicial officer to disqualify himself in a given case is left to the sound discretion of the judicial officer himself.” Zylstra v. State, 157 Idaho 457, 460 , 337 P.3d 616, 619 (2017) (quoting Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial Council, 149 Idaho 107, 113 , 233 P.3d 38, 44 (2009)). | 3 | 3 |
Liteky v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2023“Thus, judicial remarks during the course of a trial that are critical or disapproving of, or even hostile to, counsel, the parties, or their cases, ordinarily do not support a bias or partiality challenge[.]” Id. 2023“Thus, judicial remarks during the course of a trial that are critical or disapproving of, or even hostile to, counsel, the parties, or their cases, ordinarily do not support a bias or partiality challenge[.]” Id. | 1 | 8 |
State v. Timothy Alan Dunlapgreen2 sentences2016Thus, judicial remarks during the course of a trial that are critical or disapproving of, or even hostile to, counsel, the parties, or their cases, ordinarily do not support a bias or partiality challenge.... 5 Id. at 391, 313 P.3d at 47 (quoting Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540 , 555–56 (1994)). 2016Thus, judicial remarks during the course of a trial that are critical or disapproving of, or even hostile to, counsel, the parties, or their cases, ordinarily do not support a bias or partiality challenge.... 5 Id. at 391, 313 P.3d at 47 (quoting Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540 , 555–56 (1994)). | 1 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hall v. State
green
2 sentences2024“Thus, judicial remarks during the course of a trial that are critical or disapproving of, or even hostile to, counsel, the parties, or their cases, ordinarily do not support a bias or partiality challenge[.]” Hall v. State, 172 Idaho 334 , 367, 533 P.3d 243 , 276 (2023) (alteration in original). 2024“Thus, judicial remarks during the course of a trial that are critical or disapproving of, or even hostile to, counsel, the parties, or their cases, ordinarily do not support a bias or partiality challenge[.]” Hall v. State, 172 Idaho 334 , 367, 533 P.3d 243 , 276 (2023) (alteration in original). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.