Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 2012–2024 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Roberts v. Robertsgreen2 sentences2024However, in Roberts v. Roberts, 138 Idaho 401, 405 , 64 P.3d 327, 331 (2003), the Idaho Supreme Court held in a case where a mother wanted to move with the children, that “the moving parent has the burden of proving relocation would be in the best interests of the child before moving in violation of a previous custody arrangement.” Id. 2024However, in Roberts v. Roberts, 138 Idaho 401, 405 , 64 P.3d 327, 331 (2003), the Idaho Supreme Court held in a case where a mother wanted to move with the children, that “the moving parent has the burden of proving relocation would be in the best interests of the child before moving in violation of a previous custody arrangement.” Id. | 3 | 9 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Allbright v. Allbright
green
2 sentences2012It was the relocation of the children_Thus, Roberts is not authority for the proposition that the court in a divorce action has the authority to determine the geographic area in which either or both parents will reside.” Allbright, 147 Idaho at 755 , 215 P.3d at 475 . 3 . 2012It was the relocation of the children_Thus, Roberts is not authority for the proposition that the court in a divorce action has the authority to determine the geographic area in which either or both parents will reside.” Allbright, 147 Idaho at 755 , 215 P.3d at 475 . 3 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.