Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Penagreen2 sentences2003The court concluded that assuming that the armed robbery instruction was deficient for omitting the accountability language, “the instructions as a whole ameliorated any defect stemming from the omission of the accountability phrase.” Pena , 317 Ill. 2003The court concluded that assuming that the armed robbery instruction was deficient for omitting the accountability language, “the instructions as a whole ameliorated any defect stemming from the omission of the accountability phrase.” Pena, 317 Ill. | 1 | 2 |
People v. Toygreen1 sentence2011People v. Toy, 407 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Quiroz
green
2 sentences2008The court noted that the location of the two shootings was within "two blocks" of the location of the armed robbery and that defense counsel conceded that " 'there is no question there is proximity of time and location in this case.' " Quiroz, 257 Ill. 2008The court noted that the location of the two shootings was within “two blocks” of the location of the armed robbery and that defense counsel conceded that “ ‘there is no question there is proximity of time and location in this case.’ ” Quiroz, 257 Ill. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
People v. Ayala
green
1 sentence1990People v. Ayala (1986), 142 Ill. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
People v. Reddick
green
2 sentences1990(People v. Reddick (1988), 123 Ill. 2d 184 , 526 N.E.2d 141 .) On the merits, defendant’s argument has previously been considered and rejected by this court on numerous occasions and we see no reason to depart from our previous holdings on this issue. 1990(People v. Reddick (1988), 123 Ill. 2d 184 , 526 N.E.2d 141 .) On the merits, defendant’s argument has previously been considered and rejected by this court on numerous occasions and we see no reason to depart from our previous holdings on this issue. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
People v. Hendricks
neutral
1 sentence1980App. 3d 178 , 353 N.E.2d 177 ), and defendant does not dispute the propriety of giving the armed robbery instruction itself. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Bruton v. United States
green
2 sentences1977According to Hall, this testimony served to implicate him in commission of the armed robbery in violation of the teachings of Bruton v. United States (1968), 391 U.S. 123 , 20 L. 1977According to Hall, this testimony served to implicate him in commission of the armed robbery in violation of the teachings of Bruton v. United States (1968), 391 U.S. 123 , 20 L. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.